Elsa Erixon1, Susanne Köbler, Helge Rask-Andersen. 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Uppsala University Hospital and Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of ORL Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. elsa.erixon@surgsci.uu.se
Abstract
CONCLUSION: Prevalent hearing conservation may be achieved after round window (RW) cochlear implantation using soft and flexible electrode arrays if variations of RW anatomy, topography, and facial nerve position are considered. The most favorable electrode insertion depth remains to be established. OBJECTIVES: We assessed the incidence of cochlear function after cochlear implant (CI) electrode insertion through the RW in our first 21 consecutively operated patients aimed at hearing conservation. METHODS: Eleven patients had a preoperative low frequency hearing suitable for electro-acoustic stimulation. Hearing was preserved in an additional nine patients at their request with the intention to use full frequency CI stimulation. Anatomic variations of the RW were carefully considered using our temporal bone collection of micro-dissected ears. Electrode extension was assessed on X-ray by measuring the insertion angle of the first electrode and intra-cochlear length and correlated with audiometric data. RESULTS: There was no incidence of total loss of residual hearing in any of the patients. A slight deterioration of low frequency thresholds occurred in some patients. Mean hearing loss at 125-500 Hz was 14.4 dB at 1 month following surgery and 15.6 dB after 1 year. Insertion angle (300-540°) and depth (17.5-28.5 mm) were not statistically correlated to hearing loss.
CONCLUSION: Prevalent hearing conservation may be achieved after round window (RW) cochlear implantation using soft and flexible electrode arrays if variations of RW anatomy, topography, and facial nerve position are considered. The most favorable electrode insertion depth remains to be established. OBJECTIVES: We assessed the incidence of cochlear function after cochlear implant (CI) electrode insertion through the RW in our first 21 consecutively operated patients aimed at hearing conservation. METHODS: Eleven patients had a preoperative low frequency hearing suitable for electro-acoustic stimulation. Hearing was preserved in an additional nine patients at their request with the intention to use full frequency CI stimulation. Anatomic variations of the RW were carefully considered using our temporal bone collection of micro-dissected ears. Electrode extension was assessed on X-ray by measuring the insertion angle of the first electrode and intra-cochlear length and correlated with audiometric data. RESULTS: There was no incidence of total loss of residual hearing in any of the patients. A slight deterioration of low frequency thresholds occurred in some patients. Mean hearing loss at 125-500 Hz was 14.4 dB at 1 month following surgery and 15.6 dB after 1 year. Insertion angle (300-540°) and depth (17.5-28.5 mm) were not statistically correlated to hearing loss.
Authors: George B Wanna; Jack H Noble; Rene H Gifford; Mary S Dietrich; Alex D Sweeney; Dongqing Zhang; Benoit M Dawant; Alejandro Rivas; Robert F Labadie Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 2.311
Authors: René H Gifford; D Wesley Grantham; Sterling W Sheffield; Timothy J Davis; Robert Dwyer; Michael F Dorman Journal: Hear Res Date: 2014-03-07 Impact factor: 3.208
Authors: Chenkai Dai; Mohamed Lehar; Daniel Q Sun; Lani Swarthout Rvt; John P Carey; Tim MacLachlan; Doug Brough; Hinrich Staecker; Alexandra M Della Santina; Timothy E Hullar; Charles C Della Santina Journal: J Assoc Res Otolaryngol Date: 2017-06-23