| Literature DB >> 22666158 |
Eun Joo Lee1, Sang Yeub Lee, Kwang Ho In, Se Hwa Yoo, Eun Jeong Choi, Yu Whan Oh, Sanghoon Park.
Abstract
Tuberculous destroyed lung (TDL) is diagnosed by a clear past history of tuberculosis with findings of parenchymal destruction verified by chest X-ray. Despite the resultant deterioration of lung function and quality of lives seen in TDL patients, the exact mechanism or characteristics of pulmonary function worsening have not been clearly studied. We investigated the feature of respiratory impairment of TDL patients, and studied whether extent of destroyed lung measured with chest CT has any correlation with routine lung function. To evaluate the degree of destruction, the Goddard classification scoring system was modified into a novel scoring system (destroyed lung score, (DLS)) with a score from 0 to 4. Twenty-five subjects were enrolled. TDL predominantly manifested as an obstructive pattern (64%, 16/25). Median value of DLS of the entire lung was 2.6 (1.7-3.9). Absolute values of FEV1 and FVC were both negatively associated with DLS (r = -0.78, P = 0.001, and r = -0.61, P = 0.021). Percentage of predicted value of FEV₁ and FVC were also negatively associated with DLS (r = -0.62, P = 0.019, and r = -0.76, P = 0.002). Our study shows that lung function of TDL patients were notably correlated with the extent of destroyed lung measured with chest CT scan.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22666158 PMCID: PMC3361332 DOI: 10.1100/2012/835031
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Figure 1Some examples for grading the extent of TDL. (a) There was no abnormality, and a score of 0 was assigned. (b) A score of 1 was given, as less than 25% of the lung parenchyma showed destroyed lesion. (c) Destroyed lung lesion involved 50–75% of the lung parenchyma, and a score of 3 was assigned. (d) Destroyed lung lesion involved more than 75% of the lung parenchyma, therefore a score of 4 was assigned.
Clinical characteristics (n = 25).
| Variables | |
|---|---|
| Age, yrs* | 62.6 ± 11.3 |
| Male/female | 17/8 |
|
| |
| PFT results | |
| FEV1, L (% predicted)* | 0.89 ± 0.37 (37.6 ± 14.1) |
| FVC, L (% predicted)* | 1.72 ± 0.87 (49.5 ± 19.9) |
| FEV1/FVC, %* | 57.0 ± 18.3 |
| TLC, L (% predicted)* | 105.3 ± 16.1 |
| DLCO, mL/min/mmHg (% predicted)* | 48.8 ± 22.7 |
| Obstructive pattern/restrictive pattern | 16 (64%)/9 (36%) |
|
| |
| ABGA results | |
| PCO2, mmHg* | 43.5 ± 12.6 |
| PO2, mmHg* | 63.0 ± 18.2 |
|
| |
| Extent of destroyed lung, score† | 2.6 (1.7–3.9) |
*Mean ± SD. †median (range).
ABGA: arterial blood gas analysis, PFT: pulmonary function tests, FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 s, FVC: forced vital capacity, TLC: total lung capacity, DLCO: diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide.
Figure 2Illustrations showing close correlation between destroyed lung scores (DLS) and pulmonary function. (a) Relationship between DLS and FEV1 (L). (b) Relationship between DLS and FEV1 (%predicted). (c) Relationship between DLS and FVC (L). (d) Relationship between DLS and FVC (% predicted).
Correlation of destroyed lung scores with pulmonary function (Spearman rank correlation).
| Variables | Correlation coefficient |
|
|---|---|---|
| FEV1 (L) | −0.78 | 0.001 |
| FEV1 (% predicted) | −0.62 | 0.018 |
| FVC (L) | −0.61 | 0.021 |
| FVC (% predicted) | −0.76 | 0.002 |
| FEV1/FVC (%) | 0.17 | 0.551 |
FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 s, FVC: forced vital capacity.