Literature DB >> 22665382

Custodiol versus blood cardioplegia in complex cardiac operations: an Australian experience.

Fabiano F Viana1, William Y Shi, Philip A Hayward, Marco E Larobina, Frank Liskaser, George Matalanis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: A single or dual-dose strategy for myocardial protection is attractive in long operations, in avoiding the need to interrupt the procedure to re-administer cardioplegia. We hypothesized that a single administration of Bretschneider histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) crystalloid solution (Custodiol) offers myocardial protection comparable with repeated tepid blood cardioplegia.
METHODS: We reviewed a prospectively compiled single-centre database containing all adult cardiac procedures performed from January 2005 to January 2011. Preoperative demographic and investigative data, operative variables and postoperative (30-day) mortality and morbidity were compared between the Custodiol and blood cardioplegia groups. The study primary endpoints were 30-day mortality, return to the operating theatre, myocardial infarction, stroke, postoperative requirement for an intra-aortic balloon pump, new renal failure, prolonged ventilation and re-admission to hospital within 30 days. Propensity score matching was performed to correct for any bias that may have been associated with the usage of Custodiol.
RESULTS: A total of 1900 cardiac surgical procedures were identified of which 126 (7%) utilized Custodiol and 1774 (93%) used blood cardioplegia as the primary cardioplegic agent. After propensity-score matching, we were able to match 71 Custodiol cases one-to-one to those receiving blood cardioplegia. There were no statistically significant differences noted for any of the endpoints studied after propensity-score matching. In particular, the proportion of mortality (blood cardioplegia: 1 vs Custodiol 4%, P = 0.63) any mortality/morbidity (blood cardioplegia: 35 vs Custodiol: 39% P = 0.46) was similar between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of Custodiol is convenient, simple and at least as safe as tepid blood cardioplegia for myocardial protection in complex cardiac operations. A randomized prospective comparison of myocardial protection strategies is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22665382     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  15 in total

Review 1.  Custodiol for myocardial protection and preservation: a systematic review.

Authors:  J James B Edelman; Michael Seco; Ben Dunne; Shannon J Matzelle; Michelle Murphy; Pragnesh Joshi; Tristan D Yan; Michael K Wilson; Paul G Bannon; Michael P Vallely; Jurgen Passage
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-11

Review 2.  Robotically assisted minimally invasive mitral valve surgery.

Authors:  Kaushik Mandal; Hazaim Alwair; Wiley L Nifong; W Randolph Chitwood
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Predictors of immediate and long-term outcomes of coronary bypass surgery in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.

Authors:  Giuseppe Gatti; Luca Maschietto; Luca Dell'Angela; Bernardo Benussi; Gabriella Forti; Lorella Dreas; Petar Soso; Marco Russo; Gianfranco Sinagra; Aniello Pappalardo
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Cold Agglutinin Autoantibodies in a Patient without a Visible Coronary Sinus Ostium: Strategies for Myocardial Protection without Using Retrograde Cardioplegia.

Authors:  Michele Heath; Suraj Yalamuri; Julie Walker; Cory Maxwell; Adam Williams; Sharon McCartney; Mani Daneshmand
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2016-06

5.  Clinical comparative analysis of histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution and St. Thomas crystalloid cardioplegia: A 12-year study from a single institution.

Authors:  Ying-Zhong Lin; Jing-Bin Huang; Xiang-Wei Li; Xian-Ming Tang; Wei-Jun Lu; Zhao-Ke Wen; Jian Liang; Dian-Yuan Li; Hao Wang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  Comparison of the different cardioplegic strategies in cardiac valves surgery: who wins the "arm-wrestling"?

Authors:  Giuseppe Comentale; Raffaele Giordano; Gaetano Palma
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  Theoretical and Practical Aspects in the Use of Bretschneider Cardioplegia.

Authors:  Claudiu Ghiragosian; Marius Harpa; Alexandra Stoica; Flămînd Oltean Sânziana; Radu Bălău; Hussam Al Hussein; Ghiragosian-Rusu Simina Elena; Radu Mircea Neagoe; Horațiu Suciu
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2022-06-02

8.  Development of cardioplegic solution without potassium: experimental study in rat.

Authors:  Karla Reichert; Helison Rafael Pereira do Carmo; Fany Lima; Anali Galluce Torina; Karlos Alexandre de Souza Vilarinho; Pedro Paulo Martins de Oliveira; Lindemberg Mota Silveira Filho; Elaine Soraya Barbosa de Oliveira Severino; Orlando Petrucci
Journal:  Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec

9.  Is cold blood cardioplegia absolutely superior to cold crystalloid cardioplegia in aortic valve surgery?

Authors:  Daniel A Lerman; Matilde Otero-Losada; Kiddy Ume; Pablo A Salgado; Sai Prasad; Kelvin Lim; Bruno Péault; Nasri Alotti
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 1.888

10.  Myocardial injury following aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis: risk factor of postoperative myocardial injury and its impact on long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Chee-Hoon Lee; Min Ho Ju; Joon Bum Kim; Cheol Hyun Chung; Sung Ho Jung; Suk Jung Choo; Jae Won Lee
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-06-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.