PURPOSE: Accurate evaluation of side branch (SB) ostium could be critical to the treatment of bifurcation lesions. We compared measured and calculated values of side branch ostial length (SBOL) in coronary bifurcation lesions with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pre-intervention and post-intervention IVUS was performed in 113 patients who underwent stent implantation of bifurcation lesions. For the IVUS longitudinal reconstruction of the bifurcation lesions, SBOL, SB diameter, and the angle between the distal portion of the main vessel (MV) and SB were directly measured. In addition, SBOL was calculated as: SB diameter/ sin (angle between distal MV and SB). The relationship between measured and calculated SBOL was then evaluated. RESULTS: The angled between the distal MV and SB were 57.3±12.4° at pre-intervention and 59.4±12.6° at post-intervention. The mean measured and calculated SBOL values were 2.91±0.86 mm and 3.06±0.77 mm at pre-intervention and 2.79±0.82 mm and 2.92±0.69 mm at post-intervention, respectively. Differences between measured and calculated SBOL were 0.15±0.44 mm at pre-intervention and 0.13±0.41 mm at post-intervention. We found that calculated SBOL was correlated with measured SBOL (pre-intervention r=0.863, p<0.001; post-intervention r=0.868, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: There was a good correlation between measured and calculated SBOLs of the bifurcation lesions in IVUS longitudinal reconstruction. SBOL in the bifurcation lesions can therefore be estimated using the SB diameter and the angle between distal MV and SB.
PURPOSE: Accurate evaluation of side branch (SB) ostium could be critical to the treatment of bifurcation lesions. We compared measured and calculated values of side branch ostial length (SBOL) in coronary bifurcation lesions with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pre-intervention and post-intervention IVUS was performed in 113 patients who underwent stent implantation of bifurcation lesions. For the IVUS longitudinal reconstruction of the bifurcation lesions, SBOL, SB diameter, and the angle between the distal portion of the main vessel (MV) and SB were directly measured. In addition, SBOL was calculated as: SB diameter/ sin (angle between distal MV and SB). The relationship between measured and calculated SBOL was then evaluated. RESULTS: The angled between the distal MV and SB were 57.3±12.4° at pre-intervention and 59.4±12.6° at post-intervention. The mean measured and calculated SBOL values were 2.91±0.86 mm and 3.06±0.77 mm at pre-intervention and 2.79±0.82 mm and 2.92±0.69 mm at post-intervention, respectively. Differences between measured and calculated SBOL were 0.15±0.44 mm at pre-intervention and 0.13±0.41 mm at post-intervention. We found that calculated SBOL was correlated with measured SBOL (pre-intervention r=0.863, p<0.001; post-intervention r=0.868, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: There was a good correlation between measured and calculated SBOLs of the bifurcation lesions in IVUS longitudinal reconstruction. SBOL in the bifurcation lesions can therefore be estimated using the SB diameter and the angle between distal MV and SB.
Authors: G S Mintz; S E Nissen; W D Anderson; S R Bailey; R Erbel; P J Fitzgerald; F J Pinto; K Rosenfield; R J Siegel; E M Tuzcu; P G Yock Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Issam Moussa; Ricardo A Costa; Martin B Leon; Alexandra J Lansky; Zoran Lasic; Ecaterina Cristea; Nenad Trubelja; Stephane G Carlier; Roxana Mehran; George D Dangas; Giora Weisz; Edward M Kreps; Michael Collins; Gregg W Stone; Jeffrey W Moses Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2006-03-20 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Ricardo A Costa; Gary S Mintz; Stephane G Carlier; Alexandra J Lansky; Issam Moussa; Kenichi Fujii; Hideo Takebayashi; Takenori Yasuda; Jose R Costa; Yoshihiro Tsuchiya; Lisette O Jensen; Ecaterina Cristea; Roxana Mehran; George D Dangas; Sriram Iyer; Michael Collins; Edward M Kreps; Antonio Colombo; Gregg W Stone; Martin B Leon; Jeffrey W Moses Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2005-08-16 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Angela Hoye; Ioannis Iakovou; Lei Ge; Carlos A G van Mieghem; Andrew T L Ong; John Cosgrave; Giuseppe M Sangiorgi; Flavio Airoldi; Matteo Montorfano; Iassen Michev; Alaide Chieffo; Mauro Carlino; Nicola Corvaja; Jiro Aoki; Gaston A Rodriguez Granillo; Marco Valgimigli; Georgios Sianos; Willem J van der Giessen; Pim J de Feyter; Ron T van Domburg; Patrick W Serruys; Antonio Colombo Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2006-04-24 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: M Pan; A Medina; J Suárez de Lezo; M Romero; F Melián; D Pavlovic; E Hernández; J Segura; J Marrero; F Torres Journal: Am Heart J Date: 1995-03 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: D Aliabadi; F V Tilli; T R Bowers; K H Benzuly; R D Safian; J A Goldstein; C L Grines; W W O'Neill Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 1997-10-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: D L Fischman; M P Savage; M B Leon; R A Schatz; S Ellis; M W Cleman; J W Hirshfeld; P Teirstein; S Bailey; C M Walker Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1993-11-15 Impact factor: 24.094