BACKGROUND: As we have previously reported, the preoperative profile defined by INTERMACS is a good predictor for the prognosis after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, but is largely dependent on the physician's decision. Several other risk stratification systems including objective parameters (eg, Leitz-Miller, Columbia, Seattle Heart Failure Model, APACHE II) have been proposed to estimate patient's mortality after LVAD implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: According to the preoperative data from 59 patients who received LVAD (10 implantable, 49 extracorporeal) since 2002 through 2010, we performed a logistic analysis and constructed a new scoring system (ie, the TODAI VAD score (TVAD score), assigning 8 points to serum albumin <3.2mg/dl (odds ratio [OR] 8.475), 7 points to serum total bilirubin >4.8mg/dl (OR 7.300), 6 points to left ventricular end-diastolic diameter <55mm (OR 5.917), 5 points to central venous pressure >11mmHg (OR 5.128)). The receiver-operating characteristic analysis showed that the area under the curve of our new scoring system (0.864) was significantly larger than any of the abovementioned 5 scoring methods (all P<0.05). With the TVAD score, low (0-8 points), intermediate (9-17 points), and high (18-26 points) risk strata had significantly different 1-year survival rates of 95%, 54%, and 14%, respectively (all P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The TVAD score can predict the prognosis after LVAD implantation much better than the previously known methods.
BACKGROUND: As we have previously reported, the preoperative profile defined by INTERMACS is a good predictor for the prognosis after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, but is largely dependent on the physician's decision. Several other risk stratification systems including objective parameters (eg, Leitz-Miller, Columbia, Seattle Heart Failure Model, APACHE II) have been proposed to estimate patient's mortality after LVAD implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: According to the preoperative data from 59 patients who received LVAD (10 implantable, 49 extracorporeal) since 2002 through 2010, we performed a logistic analysis and constructed a new scoring system (ie, the TODAI VAD score (TVAD score), assigning 8 points to serum albumin <3.2mg/dl (odds ratio [OR] 8.475), 7 points to serum total bilirubin >4.8mg/dl (OR 7.300), 6 points to left ventricular end-diastolic diameter <55mm (OR 5.917), 5 points to central venous pressure >11mmHg (OR 5.128)). The receiver-operating characteristic analysis showed that the area under the curve of our new scoring system (0.864) was significantly larger than any of the abovementioned 5 scoring methods (all P<0.05). With the TVAD score, low (0-8 points), intermediate (9-17 points), and high (18-26 points) risk strata had significantly different 1-year survival rates of 95%, 54%, and 14%, respectively (all P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The TVAD score can predict the prognosis after LVAD implantation much better than the previously known methods.
Authors: Manreet K Kanwar; Lisa C Lohmueller; Robert L Kormos; Natasha A Loghmanpour; Raymond L Benza; Robert J Mentz; Stephen H Bailey; Srinivas Murali; James F Antaki Journal: ASAIO J Date: 2017 May/Jun Impact factor: 2.872
Authors: Pavan Atluri; Andrew B Goldstone; Dale M Kobrin; Jeffrey E Cohen; John W MacArthur; Jessica L Howard; Mariell L Jessup; J Eduardo Rame; Michael A Acker; Y Joseph Woo Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2013-05-31 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Jennifer Sherwin; Elizabeth Thompson; Kevin D Hill; Kevin Watt; Andrew J Lodge; Daniel Gonzalez; Christoph P Hornik Journal: Cardiol Young Date: 2018-07-11 Impact factor: 1.093