Literature DB >> 22663351

Cognitive sophistication does not attenuate the bias blind spot.

Richard F West1, Russell J Meserve, Keith E Stanovich.   

Abstract

The so-called bias blind spot arises when people report that thinking biases are more prevalent in others than in themselves. Bias turns out to be relatively easy to recognize in the behaviors of others, but often difficult to detect in one's own judgments. Most previous research on the bias blind spot has focused on bias in the social domain. In 2 studies, we found replicable bias blind spots with respect to many of the classic cognitive biases studied in the heuristics and biases literature (e.g., Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). Further, we found that none of these bias blind spots were attenuated by measures of cognitive sophistication such as cognitive ability or thinking dispositions related to bias. If anything, a larger bias blind spot was associated with higher cognitive ability. Additional analyses indicated that being free of the bias blind spot does not help a person avoid the actual classic cognitive biases. We discuss these findings in terms of a generic dual-process theory of cognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22663351     DOI: 10.1037/a0028857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  12 in total

1.  Common sense or cognitive bias and groupthink: does it belong in our clinical reasoning?

Authors:  Venthan Mailoo
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  I am not biased. It is everyone else's problem.

Authors:  Tim R Watkins; Lisa A Harvey
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  More Is Not Always Better: Intuitions About Effective Public Policy Can Lead to Unintended Consequences.

Authors:  Ellen Peters; William Klein; Annette Kaufman; Louise Meilleur; Anna Dixon
Journal:  Soc Issues Policy Rev       Date:  2013-01-01

4.  Revisiting the Relationship between Individual Differences in Analytic Thinking and Religious Belief: Evidence That Measurement Order Moderates Their Inverse Correlation.

Authors:  Anna J Finley; David Tang; Brandon J Schmeichel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Motivation alters impression formation and related neural systems.

Authors:  Brent L Hughes; Jamil Zaki; Nalini Ambady
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Does mathematics training lead to better logical thinking and reasoning? A cross-sectional assessment from students to professors.

Authors:  Clio Cresswell; Craig P Speelman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Reconciling the opposing effects of neurobiological evidence on criminal sentencing judgments.

Authors:  Corey H Allen; Karina Vold; Gidon Felsen; Jennifer S Blumenthal-Barby; Eyal Aharoni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Measuring Individual Differences in Decision Biases: Methodological Considerations.

Authors:  Balazs Aczel; Bence Bago; Aba Szollosi; Andrei Foldes; Bence Lukacs
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-11-19

9.  Cognitive Style and Frame Susceptibility in Decision-Making.

Authors:  David R Mandel; Irina V Kapler
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-08-10

10.  Testing an active intervention to deter researchers' use of questionable research practices.

Authors:  S V Bruton; M Brown; D F Sacco; R Didlake
Journal:  Res Integr Peer Rev       Date:  2019-11-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.