Literature DB >> 22663156

Can older adults accurately judge their learning of emotional information?

Sarah K Tauber1, John Dunlosky.   

Abstract

Prior research suggests that older adults judge their learning as well as young adults, but given age-related differences in the processing of emotional materials, older adults may show deficits in their judgment accuracy when they study emotionally charged words. In 2 experiments, we evaluated this possibility by having young and older adults study negative, positive, and neutral words. They made a judgment of learning (JOL) after studying each word and then later had a free recall test. In Experiment 1, young and older adults' JOLs were sensitive to negative words (higher JOLs for negative than neutral words). By contrast, whereas young adults' JOLs were sensitive to positive emotion (higher for positive than neutral words), older adults' JOLs were insensitive. In Experiment 2, we replicated this age-related deficit in sensitivity to positive emotion, as well as evaluated possible explanations for it. As important, in both experiments, JOLs were plotted as a function of input serial position, and the shape of these curves were not influenced by emotional valence or age group. Taken together, these results indicate that healthy aging largely leaves judgments of learning intact for negatively charged words. 2013 APA, all rights reserved

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22663156     DOI: 10.1037/a0028447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Aging        ISSN: 0882-7974


  9 in total

1.  The influences of valence and arousal on judgments of learning and on recall.

Authors:  Kathleen L Hourihan; Scott H Fraundorf; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-01

2.  Functional and Pathological Correlates of Judgments of Learning in Cognitively Unimpaired Older Adults.

Authors:  Federico d'Oleire Uquillas; Heidi I L Jacobs; Aaron P Schultz; Bernard J Hanseeuw; Rachel F Buckley; Jorge Sepulcre; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Nancy J Donovan; Keith A Johnson; Reisa A Sperling; Patrizia Vannini
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  When will bigger be (recalled) better? The influence of category size on JOLs depends on test format.

Authors:  Kathleen L Hourihan; Jonathan G Tullis
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-08

4.  Simultaneous utilization of multiple cues in judgments of learning.

Authors:  Monika Undorf; Anke Söllner; Arndt Bröder
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-05

5.  Beliefs about memory decline in aging do not impact judgments of learning (JOLs): A challenge for belief-based explanations of JOLs.

Authors:  Sarah K Tauber; Amber E Witherby; John Dunlosky
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-08

6.  The effects of emotion on younger and older adults' monitoring of learning.

Authors:  Sarah K Tauber; John Dunlosky; Heather L Urry; Philipp C Opitz
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2016-09-27

7.  Effects of age on metacognitive efficiency.

Authors:  Emma C Palmer; Anthony S David; Stephen M Fleming
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2014-07-26

8.  Stability and consistency of metamemory judgments within a session.

Authors:  Michael K Yeung
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-08-22

9.  The Effect of Word Frequency on Judgments of Learning: Contributions of Beliefs and Processing Fluency.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Jia; Ping Li; Xinyu Li; Yuchi Zhang; Wei Cao; Liren Cao; Weijian Li
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-01-06
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.