Literature DB >> 22662870

Differential surface deposition of complement proteins on logarithmic and stationary phase Leishmania chagasi promastigotes.

Amanda E Ramer-Tait1, Soi Meng Lei, Bryan H Bellaire, Jeffrey K Beetham.   

Abstract

Previous works demonstrated that various species of Leishmania promastigotes exhibit differential sensitivity to complement-mediated lysis (CML) during development. Upon exposure to normal human serum (NHS), cultures of Leishmania chagasi promastigotes recently isolated from infected hamsters (fewer than 5 in vitro passages) are CML-sensitive when in the logarithmic growth phase but become CML-resistant upon transition to the stationary culture phase. Visualization by light and electron microscopy revealed dramatic morphological differences between promastigotes from the 2 culture phases following exposure to NHS. Flow cytometric analysis demonstrated that surface deposition of the complement components C3, C5, and C9 correlated inversely with promastigote CML-resistance. The highest levels of complement protein surface accumulation were observed for logarithmic phase promastigotes, while stationary phase promastigotes adsorbed the least amount of complement proteins. Additionally, fluorescence microscopy revealed that C3 and C5 localized in a fairly uniform pattern to the plasma membrane of promastigotes from logarithmic phase cultures, while the staining of promastigotes from stationary phase cultures was indistinguishable from background. By Western blot analysis, high levels of the complement proteins C3, C5, and C9 were detected in the total lysates of NHS-exposed logarithmic phase L. chagasi promastigotes, relative to NHS-exposed stationary phase promastigotes; this finding indicates that the low levels of C3 and C5 seen on the surface of stationary phase promastigotes were not due to protein uptake/internalization. Together, these data demonstrate the differential deposition of complement proteins on the surfaces of logarithmic and stationary phase L. chagasi promastigotes. The data support a model wherein stationary phase L. chagasi promastigotes resist CML by limiting the deposition of C3 and its derivatives, which, in turn, limit surface levels of complement proteins (including C5 and C9) that form the lytic membrane attack complex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22662870      PMCID: PMC3630509          DOI: 10.1645/GE-3130.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Parasitol        ISSN: 0022-3395            Impact factor:   1.276


  32 in total

1.  Genetic complementation to identify DNA elements that influence complement resistance in Leishmania chagasi.

Authors:  R R Dahlin-Laborde; T P Yu; J K Beetham
Journal:  J Parasitol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.276

2.  Differential sensitivity of New World Leishmania spp. promastigotes to complement-mediated lysis: correlation with the expression of three parasite polypeptides.

Authors:  F S Noronha; A C Nunes; K T Souza; M N Melo; F J Ramalho-Pinto
Journal:  Acta Trop       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.112

3.  Targeted gene deletion of Leishmania major genes encoding developmental stage-specific leishmanolysin (GP63).

Authors:  P B Joshi; D L Sacks; G Modi; W R McMaster
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.501

4.  Glycoprotein 46 mRNA abundance is post-transcriptionally regulated during development of Leishmania chagasi promastigotes to an infectious form.

Authors:  J K Beetham; K S Myung; J J McCoy; M E Wilson; J E Donelson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1997-07-11       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Identification of an infective stage of Leishmania promastigotes.

Authors:  D L Sacks; P V Perkins
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-03-30       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Proteomic examination of Leishmania chagasi plasma membrane proteins: Contrast between avirulent and virulent (metacyclic) parasite forms.

Authors:  Chaoqun Yao; Yalan Li; John E Donelson; Mary E Wilson
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Population changes in Leishmania chagasi promastigote developmental stages due to serial passage.

Authors:  Soi Meng Lei; Nathan M Romine; Jeffrey K Beetham
Journal:  J Parasitol       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 1.276

8.  Growth cycle-dependent generation of complement-resistant Leishmania promastigotes.

Authors:  E D Franke; P B McGreevy; S P Katz; D L Sacks
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 5.422

9.  Characterization of DNA sequences that confer complement resistance in Leishmania chagasi.

Authors:  Rebecca R Dahlin-Laborde; Eric J Scolaro; Nathan M Romine; Amanda E Ramer-Tait; Soi Meng Lei; Jeffrey K Beetham
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Immune adherence-mediated opsonophagocytosis: the mechanism of Leishmania infection.

Authors:  M Domínguez; A Toraño
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1999-01-04       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  2 in total

1.  Asymptomatic Visceral Leishmania infantum Infection in US Soldiers Deployed to Iraq.

Authors:  Rupal M Mody; Ines Lakhal-Naouar; Jeffrey E Sherwood; Nancy L Koles; Dutchabong Shaw; Daniel P Bigley; Edgie-Mark A Co; Nathanial K Copeland; Linda L Jagodzinski; Rami M Mukbel; Rebecca A Smiley; Robert C Duncan; Shaden Kamhawi; Selma M B Jeronimo; Robert F DeFraites; Naomi E Aronson
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 2.  Innate immunity against Leishmania infections.

Authors:  Prajwal Gurung; Thirumala-Devi Kanneganti
Journal:  Cell Microbiol       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 3.715

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.