OBJECTIVE: Contamination is an important risk factor for peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related peritonitis. The present study outlines the clinical characteristics and outcomes of PD patients experiencing touch contamination. METHODS: We reviewed the case records of PD patients from 1995 to 2010. Patients who experienced contamination of their PD system were identified and stratified into "dry" and "wet" contamination groups. Risk factors, microbiology, and clinical outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Of 548 episodes of touch contamination, 246 involved dry contamination, and 302, wet contamination. After contamination, 17 episodes of peritonitis (3.1%) developed; all episodes occurred in the wet contamination group (p < 0.001). The incidence of peritonitis after wet contamination was 5.63%. Prophylactic antibiotics significantly reduced the risk of peritonitis (1 of 182 episodes, p < 0.001). Half the patients experiencing peritonitis had either culture-negative or staphylococcal episodes, and most of those episodes responded to intraperitoneal antibiotics. In 2 patients, peritonitis was attributable to Pseudomonas, and in 3, to Acinetobacter. In these latter patients, outcomes were less favorable, with catheter removal being required in 4 of the 5 episodes. CONCLUSIONS: The overall rate of peritonitis was low after contamination. Wet contamination was associated with a much higher risk of peritonitis. Prophylactic antibiotics after wet contamination were effective in preventing peritonitis.
OBJECTIVE: Contamination is an important risk factor for peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related peritonitis. The present study outlines the clinical characteristics and outcomes of PDpatients experiencing touch contamination. METHODS: We reviewed the case records of PDpatients from 1995 to 2010. Patients who experienced contamination of their PD system were identified and stratified into "dry" and "wet" contamination groups. Risk factors, microbiology, and clinical outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Of 548 episodes of touch contamination, 246 involved dry contamination, and 302, wet contamination. After contamination, 17 episodes of peritonitis (3.1%) developed; all episodes occurred in the wet contamination group (p < 0.001). The incidence of peritonitis after wet contamination was 5.63%. Prophylactic antibiotics significantly reduced the risk of peritonitis (1 of 182 episodes, p < 0.001). Half the patients experiencing peritonitis had either culture-negative or staphylococcal episodes, and most of those episodes responded to intraperitoneal antibiotics. In 2 patients, peritonitis was attributable to Pseudomonas, and in 3, to Acinetobacter. In these latter patients, outcomes were less favorable, with catheter removal being required in 4 of the 5 episodes. CONCLUSIONS: The overall rate of peritonitis was low after contamination. Wet contamination was associated with a much higher risk of peritonitis. Prophylactic antibiotics after wet contamination were effective in preventing peritonitis.
Authors: Philip Kam-Tao Li; Cheuk Chun Szeto; Beth Piraino; Judith Bernardini; Ana E Figueiredo; Amit Gupta; David W Johnson; Ed J Kuijper; Wai-Choong Lye; William Salzer; Franz Schaefer; Dirk G Struijk Journal: Perit Dial Int Date: 2010 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.756
Authors: Miguel Pérez Fontan; Ana Rodríguez-Carmona; Rafael García-Naveiro; Miguel Rosales; Pedro Villaverde; Francisco Valdés Journal: Perit Dial Int Date: 2005 May-Jun Impact factor: 1.756
Authors: Terence Yip; Kai Chung Tse; Man Fai Lam; Suk Wai Cheng; Sing Leung Lui; Sydney Tang; Matthew Ng; Tak Mao Chan; Kar Neng Lai; Wai Kei Lo Journal: Perit Dial Int Date: 2007 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 1.756
Authors: Bourne Lewis Auguste; Michael Girsberger; Claire Kennedy; Thatsaphan Srithongkul; Margaret McGrath-Chong; Joanne Bargman; Christopher T Chan Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-01-20 Impact factor: 2.692