Literature DB >> 22661570

Modern metal-on-metal hip implants.

Kevin J Bozic1, James Browne, Chris J Dangles, Paul A Manner, Adolph J Yates, Kristy L Weber, Kevin M Boyer, Paul Zemaitis, Anne Woznica, Charles M Turkelson, Janet L Wies.   

Abstract

This Technology Overview was prepared using systematic review methodology and summarizes the findings of studies published as of July 15, 2011, on modern metal-on-metal hip implants. Analyses conducted on outcomes by two joint registries indicate that patients who receive metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty (THA) and hip resurfacing are at greater risk for revision than are patients who receive THA using a different bearing surface combination. Data from these registries also indicate that larger femoral head components have higher revision rates and risk of revision and that older age is associated with increased revision risks of large-head metal-on-metal THA. Several studies noted a correlation between suboptimal hip implant positioning and higher wear rates, local metal debris release, and consequent local tissue reactions to metal debris. In addition, several studies reported elevated serum metal ion concentrations in patients with metal-on-metal hip articulations, although the clinical significance of these elevated ion concentrations remains unknown.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22661570     DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-20-06-402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg        ISSN: 1067-151X            Impact factor:   3.020


  9 in total

Review 1.  Metallic debris from metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty regulates periprosthetic tissues.

Authors:  Christoph H Lohmann; Gurpal Singh; Hans-Georg Willert; Gottfried H Buchhorn
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-11-18

2.  CORR Insights®: revisions of monoblock metal-on-metal THAs have high early complication rates.

Authors:  James P McAuley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Joint replacement surgery and the innate immune system.

Authors:  Stuart B Goodman; Yrjo T Konttinen; Michiaki Takagi
Journal:  J Long Term Eff Med Implants       Date:  2014

4.  Primary ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty using a 32-mm ceramic head with a titanium-alloy sleeve.

Authors:  Seung-Jae Lim; Seung-Pil Jang; Dong-Wook Kim; Young-Wan Moon; Youn-Soo Park
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Patients report improvement in quality of life and satisfaction after hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Wael A Rahman; Nelson V Greidanus; Alexander Siegmeth; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Chromium and Nickel Concentrations in Subjects with a Stainless Steel Metal-on-Metal Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: Results from a Prospective Longitudinal Study with 7 Years Follow-Up.

Authors:  Vaneet Singh; Anastasia K Skipor; Abdulhafez A Selim; Joshua J Jacobs
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-31

7.  Environmental Factors Impacting Bone-Relevant Chemokines.

Authors:  Justin T Smith; Andrew D Schneider; Karina M Katchko; Chawon Yun; Erin L Hsu
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 5.555

8.  Metallosis following hip arthroplasty: two case reports.

Authors:  M Mastel; A Boisvert; R Moore; F Sutherland; J Powell
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2022-03-23

9.  Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty adverse local tissue reaction with intermittent unilateral vascular claudication.

Authors:  Alex Lencioni; Byron Ellis; Chase S Dean; James Lendrum; Craig A Hogan
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2019-09-26
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.