BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to analyze the effectiveness of lipid-lowering therapy and therapeutic decisions made by physicians for patients not achieving LDL targets. METHODS: 11,768 patients undergoing therapy with statins for secondary prevention of atherosclerosis participated in a two-visit survey. In subjects not achieving the LDL-target (< 100 mg/dl), further therapeutic decisions made by physicians were recorded. RESULTS: Initially the LDL-target was achieved by 7.8% of patients on simvastatin and by 18.0% on atorvastatin, of which 20.8% were treated with at least a 40 mg dose. The most common changes in therapy to improve effectiveness was substituting simvastatin for another statin (75.2%, usually atorvastatin), or increasing atorvastatin dosage (59.8%). Intensification of a low fat diet and weight reduction were more frequently recommended in treatment with atorvastatin than with simvastatin (59.8% vs. 55.9%, p < 0.001). After enhanced therapy, the LDL-target was achieved by 27.8% on simvastatin and by 35.0% on atorvastatin (p < 0.001). In those with LDL levels remaining above the target, substitution of simvastatin with atorvastatin (49.9%), or the increase of atorvastatin dose (41.4%) was recommended. As previously, life-style counseling was more frequent in patients on atorvastatin (66.1% vs. 45.7% p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: 1. The use of low dose statins and noncompliance with behavioral modification guidelines are responsible for the low levels of effectiveness found with lipid-lowering therapies. 2. Physicians prefer substitution of less effective statins over the increase of dose in patients not achieving LDL targets. 3. Life-style changes are under-prescribed by physicians and under-implemented by their patients.
BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to analyze the effectiveness of lipid-lowering therapy and therapeutic decisions made by physicians for patients not achieving LDL targets. METHODS: 11,768 patients undergoing therapy with statins for secondary prevention of atherosclerosis participated in a two-visit survey. In subjects not achieving the LDL-target (< 100 mg/dl), further therapeutic decisions made by physicians were recorded. RESULTS: Initially the LDL-target was achieved by 7.8% of patients on simvastatin and by 18.0% on atorvastatin, of which 20.8% were treated with at least a 40 mg dose. The most common changes in therapy to improve effectiveness was substituting simvastatin for another statin (75.2%, usually atorvastatin), or increasing atorvastatin dosage (59.8%). Intensification of a low fat diet and weight reduction were more frequently recommended in treatment with atorvastatin than with simvastatin (59.8% vs. 55.9%, p < 0.001). After enhanced therapy, the LDL-target was achieved by 27.8% on simvastatin and by 35.0% on atorvastatin (p < 0.001). In those with LDL levels remaining above the target, substitution of simvastatin with atorvastatin (49.9%), or the increase of atorvastatin dose (41.4%) was recommended. As previously, life-style counseling was more frequent in patients on atorvastatin (66.1% vs. 45.7% p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: 1. The use of low dose statins and noncompliance with behavioral modification guidelines are responsible for the low levels of effectiveness found with lipid-lowering therapies. 2. Physicians prefer substitution of less effective statins over the increase of dose in patients not achieving LDL targets. 3. Life-style changes are under-prescribed by physicians and under-implemented by their patients.