Literature DB >> 22661047

Comparison of four reconstructive methods for diaphyseal defects of the humerus after tumor resection.

Vasileios I Sakellariou1, Andreas F Mavrogenis, George C Babis, Panayiotis N Soucacos, Evangelos A Magnissalis, Panayiotis J Papagelopoulos.   

Abstract

The objective of the current study was to compare quantitative data on the biomechanical analysis of different techniques for fixation of intercalary bone defects of the humerus, by means of consistently applied methodology on composite models. A total of 25 humeral specimens of composite models were used. An intercalary defect was created and reconstructed using plates, intramedullary nails, external fixators and segmental prosthetic implants. The specimens were loaded under axial compression, four-point bending and torsion within the linear elastic region. Modular segmental implants and intramedullary nails were able to compensate significantly greater amounts of compressive loads compared to locking plates and external fixators. However, in flexion and torsion, the modular segmental implants and the external fixators were significantly better load-bearing devices compared to the intramedullary nails and plates. Early mobilization of the upper limb in patients with diaphyseal bone defects of the humerus could probably be more safe and tolerable when reconstructed with modular segmental implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22661047     DOI: 10.1123/jab.28.5.568

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Biomech        ISSN: 1065-8483            Impact factor:   1.833


  7 in total

1.  Outcomes of a Modular Intercalary Endoprosthesis as Treatment for Segmental Defects of the Femur, Tibia, and Humerus.

Authors:  Joseph Benevenia; Rainer Kirchner; Francis Patterson; Kathleen Beebe; Dieter C Wirtz; Steven Rivero; Mark Palma; Max J Friedrich
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Outcomes of Intercalary Prosthetic Reconstruction for Pathological Diaphyseal Femoral Fractures Secondary to Metastatic Tumors.

Authors:  Hong-Chao Huang; Yong-Cheng Hu; Deng-Xing Lun; Jun Miao; Feng Wang; Xiong-Gang Yang; Xin-Long Ma
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 2.071

3.  [Intercalary reconstruction for diaphyseal bone defects with a modular replacement system: Clinical results].

Authors:  M J Friedrich; J Schmolders; G Lob; T M Randau; S Gravius; D C Wirtz; P H Pennekamp
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 1.154

4.  Outcomes of Intercalary Endoprostheses as a Treatment for Metastases in the Femoral and Humeral Diaphysis.

Authors:  Michal Mahdal; Lukáš Pazourek; Vasileios Apostolopoulos; Dagmar Adámková Krákorová; Iva Staniczková Zambo; Tomáš Tomáš
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 3.109

5.  En bloc resection and intercalary prosthesis implantation for the treatment of humeral diaphyseal bone metastases.

Authors:  Feifei Pu; Zhicai Zhang; Baichuan Wang; Jianxiang Liu; Zengwu Shao
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Preliminary results of a new intercalary modular endoprosthesis for the management of diaphyseal bone metastases.

Authors:  Kadir Büyükdoğan; Barlas Göker; Mazhar Tokgözoğlu; Ulukan İnan; Korhan Özkan; Tahsin Sami Çolak; Lercan Aslan; Mehmet Ali Deveci; Mehmet Ayvaz
Journal:  Jt Dis Relat Surg       Date:  2021-11-19

7.  Short-term outcomes of reconstruction subsequent to intercalary resection of femoral diaphyseal metastatic tumor with pathological fracture: Comparison between segmental allograft and intercalary prosthesis.

Authors:  Deng-Xing Lun; Yong-Cheng Hu; Xiong-Gang Yang; Feng Wang; Zhao-Wan Xu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 2.967

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.