Literature DB >> 22660972

Timing of arthroplasty, what is the influence of nocturnal pain and pain at rest on the outcome?

Daniël Haverkamp1, Roy B G Brokelman, Corne J M van Loon, Albert van Kampen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether nocturnal pain and pain at rest preoperatively influence the satisfaction in patients after joint arthroplasty. The second research question is whether subjective outcome (VAS/WOMAC) after hip (THA) or knee arthroplasty (TKA) differs in patients with or without nocturnal pain and pain at rest preoperatively compared to those who do not.
METHODS: A consecutive group of 189 TKAs and 189 THAs was evaluated. The influence of pain at rest and nocturnal pain preoperatively on the outcome was evaluated by means of a one-way ANOVA. Outcome measurements used were WOMAC, VAS pain and VAS Satisfaction.
RESULTS: The results show that satisfaction at follow up was not influenced by the presence of nocturnal pain or pain at rest preoperatively. The presence of nocturnal pain and pain at rest preoperatively did result in a poorer WOMAC pain score WOMAC physical impairment score and a higher VAS pain at rest and activity after surgery for both THA and TKA.
CONCLUSION: The results show that the presence of pain at night and pain at rest in symptomatic osteoarthritic patients results in worse VAS and WOMAC scores, but with similar amounts of satisfaction at follow up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22660972     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-2071-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  17 in total

1.  Preoperative quadriceps strength as a predictor for short-term functional outcome after total hip replacement.

Authors:  Marije S Holstege; Robert Lindeboom; Cees Lucas
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  Indications for total hip replacement: comparison of assessments of orthopaedic surgeons and referring physicians.

Authors:  K E Dreinhöfer; P Dieppe; T Stürmer; D Gröber-Grätz; M Flören; K-P Günther; W Puhl; H Brenner
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2006-01-26       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  A comparison of Likert and visual analogue scales for measuring change in function.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; M Townsend; L B Berman; J L Keller
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

4.  Effect of baseline functional status and pain on outcomes of total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jeremy Holtzman; Khal Saleh; Robert Kane
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Indications for total hip and total knee arthroplasties. Results of orthopaedic surveys.

Authors:  C A Mancuso; C S Ranawat; J M Esdaile; N A Johanson; M E Charlson
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 6.  Patient characteristics affecting the prognosis of total hip and knee joint arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Pasqualina L Santaguida; Gillian A Hawker; Pamela L Hudak; Richard Glazier; Nizar N Mahomed; Hans J Kreder; Peter C Coyte; James G Wright
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Functional capacity and actual daily activity do not contribute to patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Maaike M Vissers; Ingrid B de Groot; Max Reijman; Johannes B Bussmann; Henk J Stam; Jan An Verhaar
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Waiting for total hip arthroplasty: avoidable loss in quality time and preventable deterioration.

Authors:  Marieke Ostendorf; Erik Buskens; Henk van Stel; Augustus Schrijvers; Louis Marting; Wouter Dhert; Abraham Verbout
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  "Not everyone who needs one is going to get one'': the influence of medical brokering on patient candidacy for total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Pamela L Hudak; Pamela Grassau; Richard H Glazier; Gillian Hawker; Hans Kreder; Peter Coyte; Nizar Mahomed; James G Wright
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  Variation in orthopedic surgeons' perceptions of the indications for and outcomes of knee replacement.

Authors:  J G Wright; P Coyte; G Hawker; C Bombardier; D Cooke; D Heck; R Dittus; D Freund
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-03-01       Impact factor: 8.262

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Preoperative predictors for outcomes after total hip replacement in patients with osteoarthritis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stefanie N Hofstede; Maaike G J Gademan; Thea P M Vliet Vlieland; Rob G H H Nelissen; Perla J Marang-van de Mheen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  Patella bone density is lower in knee osteoarthritis patients experiencing moderate-to-severe pain at rest.

Authors:  W Burnett; S Kontulainen; C McLennan; D Hazel; C Talmo; D Hunter; D Wilson; J Johnston
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.041

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.