OBJECTIVES:Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is etiologically heterogeneous, and a substantial proportion of MCI subjects will develop different dementia disorders. One subtype of this syndrome, amnestic MCI, occurs preferentially but not exclusively in prodromal AD and is characterized by defined deficits of episodic memory. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: For a 2-year, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study MCI patients, presenting with an amnestic syndrome but not necessarily based on presumed prodromal AD were randomized. INTERVENTION: Patients received (a) a combination of 16 mg galantamine plus 20 mg memantine, or (b) 16 mg galantamine alone or (c) placebo. MEASUREMENTS: The primary objective was to explore the differential impact of these interventions on the progression to dementia and on cognitive changes as measured by the ADAScog. RESULTS: After recruitment of 232 subjects, the trial was halted before reaching the planned sample size, because safety concerns arose in other studies with galantamine in MCI. This resulted in a variable treatment duration of 2-52 weeks. The statistical analysis plan was amended for studying cognitive effects of discontinuing the study medication, which was done separately for galantamine and memantine, and under double-blind conditions. There was one death, no unexpected severe adverse events, and no differences of severe adverse events between the treatment arms. The cognitive changes on the ADAScog were not different among the groups. Only for the subgroup of amnestic MCI with presumed AD etiology, a significant improvement of ADAScog score over placebo before the discontinuation of medication was observed, while amnestic MCI presumably due to other etiologies showed no cognitive changes with broad variation. Cognitive improvement was numerically larger in the combination treatment group than under galantamine alone. Patients who received placebo declined as expected. Discontinuation of galantamine, either as part of the combination regimen or as mono treatment, resulted in a transient decline of the ADAScog score in amnestic MCI of presumed AD etiology, while discontinuation of Memantine did not change the cognitive status. CONCLUSION: In an interrupted trial with amnestic MCI subjects the combination of galantamine plus memantine were generally well tolerated. In the subgroup of MCI subjects with presumed AD etiology, a cognitive benefit of a short-term combination treatment of galantamine plus memantine was observed, and cognitive decline occurred after discontinuation of galantamine.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is etiologically heterogeneous, and a substantial proportion of MCI subjects will develop different dementia disorders. One subtype of this syndrome, amnestic MCI, occurs preferentially but not exclusively in prodromal AD and is characterized by defined deficits of episodic memory. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: For a 2-year, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study MCI patients, presenting with an amnestic syndrome but not necessarily based on presumed prodromal AD were randomized. INTERVENTION: Patients received (a) a combination of 16 mg galantamine plus 20 mg memantine, or (b) 16 mg galantamine alone or (c) placebo. MEASUREMENTS: The primary objective was to explore the differential impact of these interventions on the progression to dementia and on cognitive changes as measured by the ADAScog. RESULTS: After recruitment of 232 subjects, the trial was halted before reaching the planned sample size, because safety concerns arose in other studies with galantamine in MCI. This resulted in a variable treatment duration of 2-52 weeks. The statistical analysis plan was amended for studying cognitive effects of discontinuing the study medication, which was done separately for galantamine and memantine, and under double-blind conditions. There was one death, no unexpected severe adverse events, and no differences of severe adverse events between the treatment arms. The cognitive changes on the ADAScog were not different among the groups. Only for the subgroup of amnestic MCI with presumed AD etiology, a significant improvement of ADAScog score over placebo before the discontinuation of medication was observed, while amnestic MCI presumably due to other etiologies showed no cognitive changes with broad variation. Cognitive improvement was numerically larger in the combination treatment group than under galantamine alone. Patients who received placebo declined as expected. Discontinuation of galantamine, either as part of the combination regimen or as mono treatment, resulted in a transient decline of the ADAScog score in amnestic MCI of presumed AD etiology, while discontinuation of Memantine did not change the cognitive status. CONCLUSION: In an interrupted trial with amnestic MCI subjects the combination of galantamine plus memantine were generally well tolerated. In the subgroup of MCI subjects with presumed AD etiology, a cognitive benefit of a short-term combination treatment of galantamine plus memantine was observed, and cognitive decline occurred after discontinuation of galantamine.
Authors: Serge Gauthier; Barry Reisberg; Michael Zaudig; Ronald C Petersen; Karen Ritchie; Karl Broich; Sylvie Belleville; Henry Brodaty; David Bennett; Howard Chertkow; Jeffrey L Cummings; Mony de Leon; Howard Feldman; Mary Ganguli; Harald Hampel; Philip Scheltens; Mary C Tierney; Peter Whitehouse; Bengt Winblad Journal: Lancet Date: 2006-04-15 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Ronald C Petersen; Joseph E Parisi; Dennis W Dickson; Kris A Johnson; David S Knopman; Bradley F Boeve; Gregory A Jicha; Robert J Ivnik; Glenn E Smith; Eric G Tangalos; Heiko Braak; Emre Kokmen Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2006-05
Authors: Matthias H Tabert; Jennifer J Manly; Xinhua Liu; Gregory H Pelton; Sara Rosenblum; Marni Jacobs; Diana Zamora; Madeleine Goodkind; Karen Bell; Yaakov Stern; D P Devanand Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2006-08
Authors: Pierre N Tariot; Martin R Farlow; George T Grossberg; Stephen M Graham; Scott McDonald; Ivan Gergel Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-01-21 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Johannes Kornhuber; Klaus Schmidtke; Lutz Frolich; Robert Perneczky; Stefanie Wolf; Harald Hampel; Frank Jessen; Isabella Heuser; Oliver Peters; Markus Weih; Holger Jahn; Christian Luckhaus; Michael Hüll; Hermann-Josef Gertz; Johannes Schröder; Johannes Pantel; Otto Rienhoff; Susanne A Seuchter; Eckart Rüther; Fritz Henn; Wolfgang Maier; Jens Wiltfang Journal: Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord Date: 2009-04-01 Impact factor: 2.959
Authors: Howard H Feldman; Steven Ferris; Bengt Winblad; Nikolaos Sfikas; Linda Mancione; Yunsheng He; Sibel Tekin; Alistair Burns; Jeffrey Cummings; Teodoro del Ser; Domenico Inzitari; Jean-Marc Orgogozo; Heinrich Sauer; Philip Scheltens; Elio Scarpini; Nathan Herrmann; Martin Farlow; Steven Potkin; H Cecil Charles; Nick C Fox; Roger Lane Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Robert M Chapman; Anton P Porsteinsson; Margaret N Gardner; Mark Mapstone; John W McCrary; Tiffany C Sandoval; Maria D Guillily; Lindsey A Reilly; Elizabeth DeGrush Journal: Curr Alzheimer Res Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 3.498
Authors: Andrea C Tricco; Charlene Soobiah; Shirra Berliner; Joanne M Ho; Carmen H Ng; Huda M Ashoor; Maggie H Chen; Brenda Hemmelgarn; Sharon E Straus Journal: CMAJ Date: 2013-09-16 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Jee-Young Han; Lilah M Besser; Chengjie Xiong; Walter A Kukull; John C Morris Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2019 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Michael Y Bai; David B Lovejoy; Gilles J Guillemin; Rouba Kozak; Trevor W Stone; Maju Mathew Koola Journal: Complex Psychiatry Date: 2021-02-08
Authors: Maju Mathew Koola; Robert W Buchanan; Anilkumar Pillai; Katherine J Aitchison; Daniel R Weinberger; Scott T Aaronson; Faith B Dickerson Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2014-05-28 Impact factor: 4.939