Literature DB >> 22658782

Monosomy 3 by FISH in uveal melanoma: variability in techniques and results.

Mary Aronow1, Yang Sun, Yogen Saunthararajah, Charles Biscotti, Raymond Tubbs, Pierre Triozzi, Arun D Singh.   

Abstract

Tumor monosomy 3 confers a poor prognosis in patients with uveal melanoma. We critically review the techniques used for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) detection of monosomy 3 in order to assess variability in practice patterns and to explain differences in results. Significant variability that has likely affected reported results was found in tissue sampling methods, selection of FISH probes, number of cells counted, and the cut-off point used to determine monosomy 3 status. Clinical parameters and specific techniques employed to report FISH results should be specified so as to allow meta-analysis of published studies. FISH-based detection of monosomy 3 in uveal melanoma has not been performed in a standardized manner, which limits conclusions regarding its clinical utility. FISH is a widely available, versatile technology, and when performed optimally has the potential to be a valuable tool for determining the prognosis of uveal melanoma.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22658782     DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2011.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0039-6257            Impact factor:   6.048


  8 in total

1.  Prognostic parameters in uveal melanoma and their association with BAP1 expression.

Authors:  T Huibertus van Essen; Sake I van Pelt; Mieke Versluis; Inge H G Bronkhorst; Sjoerd G van Duinen; Marina Marinkovic; Wilma G M Kroes; Claudia A L Ruivenkamp; Shruti Shukla; Annelies de Klein; Emine Kiliç; J William Harbour; Gregorius P M Luyten; Pieter A van der Velden; Rob M Verdijk; Martine J Jager
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Small Choroidal Melanoma: Correlation between Clinical Characteristics and Metastatic Potential.

Authors:  Shiming Luo; Vishal Raval; Emily C Zabor; Arun D Singh
Journal:  Ocul Oncol Pathol       Date:  2021-09-16

3.  Uveal Melanoma Regression after Brachytherapy: Relationship with Chromosome 3 Monosomy Status.

Authors:  Sachin M Salvi; Hassan A Aziz; Suhail Dar; Nakul Singh; Brandy Hayden-Loreck; Arun D Singh
Journal:  Ocul Oncol Pathol       Date:  2016-10-29

Review 4.  Molecular pathology of uveal melanoma.

Authors:  S E Coupland; S L Lake; M Zeschnigk; B E Damato
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Cluster analysis of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification data in choroidal melanoma.

Authors:  Rhydian Caines; Antonio Eleuteri; Helen Kalirai; Anthony C Fisher; Heinrich Heimann; Bertil E Damato; Sarah E Coupland; Azzam F G Taktak
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 2.367

6.  Monosomy 3 by chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) in Iranian patients with uveal melanoma.

Authors:  Masood Naseripour; Mitra Mehrazma; Rama Pourmatin; Mohsen Bahmani Kashkouli; Ahad Sedaghat; Elmira Gheytanchi
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-11-04

7.  Heterogeneity of monosomy 3 in fine needle aspiration biopsy of choroidal melanoma.

Authors:  Melinda Y Chang; Nagesh P Rao; Barry L Burgess; Lariza Johnson; Tara A McCannel
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 2.367

8.  Metabolic activity of primary uveal melanoma on PET/CT scan and its relationship with monosomy 3 and other prognostic factors.

Authors:  Vasilios P Papastefanou; Shahriar Islam; Teresa Szyszko; Marianne Grantham; Mandeep S Sagoo; Victoria M L Cohen
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 4.638

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.