Literature DB >> 22658671

Quality of life improves among post-menopausal women who received bone augmentation during dental implant therapy.

S Reisine1, M Freilich, D Ortiz, D Pendrys, D Shafer, P Taxel.   

Abstract

Quality of life outcomes among patients receiving implants have been well studied, but little is known about the effects of bone augmentation in this therapy. The purpose of this paper was to assess quality of life changes among postmenopausal women receiving dental implants with bone augmentation during implant therapy. This was a prospective cohort study. 48 patients were recruited at the University of Connecticut Health Center and received one of three surgical augmentation methods: dehiscence repair; expansion alone; or expansion with dehiscence repair. The predictor variable was type of augmentation procedure. Quality of life measured by the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) was the outcome measure and was assessed prior to treatment, 1 week, 8 weeks and 9 months after surgery. Changes in OHIP-14 were evaluated by repeated measures analysis of variance. The mean initial OHIP-14 scores on total items checked were 4.6 (SD=3.0) and declined significantly to 2.0 (SD=2.0) at 9 months. The mean baseline severity score was 15.4 (SD=8.9) improving significantly to 7.5 (SD=7.6) at 9 months. Type of augmentation procedure did not affect quality of life. The participants' quality of life improved continuously from the pretreatment to the 9-month assessment, including improvements 1 week after implant placement.
Copyright © 2012 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22658671      PMCID: PMC3547602          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2012.04.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  17 in total

1.  Measuring the effect of intra-oral implant rehabilitation on health-related quality of life in a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  M A Awad; D Locker; N Korner-Bitensky; J S Feine
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  How do age and tooth loss affect oral health impacts and quality of life? A study comparing two national samples.

Authors:  James G Steele; Anne E Sanders; Gary D Slade; Patrick Finbarr Allen; Satu Lahti; Nigel Nuttall; A John Spencer
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.383

3.  A 5-year prospective study of implant-supported single-tooth replacements.

Authors:  Leslie Laing Gibbard; George Zarb
Journal:  J Can Dent Assoc       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.316

4.  A case-control study assessing oral-health-related quality of life after immediately loaded single implants in healed alveolar ridges or extraction sockets.

Authors:  Filiep Raes; Lyndon F Cooper; Luís Giner Tarrida; Heleen Vandromme; Hugo De Bruyn
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 5.977

5.  Derivation and validation of a short-form oral health impact profile.

Authors:  G D Slade
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.383

6.  Critical evaluation of patient responses to dental implant therapy.

Authors:  R M Cibirka; M Razzoog; B R Lang
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.426

Review 7.  Influence of prosthetic and implant therapy on satisfaction and quality of life: a systematic literature review. Part 1--Characteristics of the studies.

Authors:  Christoph Strassburger; Guido Heydecke; Thomas Kerschbaum
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.681

8.  Two-center clinical trial of implant-retained mandibular overdentures versus complete dentures-chewing ability.

Authors:  M E Geertman; E M Boerrigter; M A Van't Hof; M A Van Waas; R P van Oort; G Boering; W Kalk
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.383

Review 9.  Patient-based assessment of the outcomes of implant therapy: a review of the literature.

Authors:  D Locker
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.681

10.  Satisfaction and psychosocial aspects of patients with an extremely resorbed mandible treated with implant-retained overdentures. A prospective, comparative study.

Authors:  Kees Stellingsma; Jelte Bouma; Boudewijn Stegenga; Henny J A Meijer; Gerry M Raghoebar
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.977

View more
  5 in total

1.  Trigeminal neurosensory deficit and patient reported outcome measures: the effect on quality of life.

Authors:  Yiu Yan Leung; Colman McGrath; Lim Kwong Cheung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Impact of maxillary sinus augmentation on oral health-related quality of life.

Authors:  E Schiegnitz; P W Kämmerer; K Sagheb; A J Wendt; A Pabst; B Al-Nawas; M O Klein
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2017-03-28

3.  Patient experience following iliac crest-derived alveolar bone grafting and implant placement.

Authors:  Cecilie G Gjerde; Siddharth Shanbhag; Evelyn Neppelberg; Kamal Mustafa; Harald Gjengedal
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2020-02-05

4.  Retrospective Evaluation of Implants Placed in Iliac Crest Autografts and Pristine Bone.

Authors:  Florian Beck; Georg Watzak; Stefan Lettner; André Gahleitner; Reinhard Gruber; Gabriella Dvorak; Christian Ulm
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Short-term improvement of masticatory function after implant restoration.

Authors:  Si-Mook Kang; Sang-Soo Lee; Ho-Keun Kwon; Baek-Il Kim
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 2.614

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.