Literature DB >> 22658450

A prospective randomised study comparing the jubilee dressing method to a standard adhesive dressing for total hip and knee replacements.

Neil G Burke1, Connor Green, Gavin McHugh, Niall McGolderick, Carol Kilcoyne, Patrick Kenny.   

Abstract

AIM OF THE STUDY: It is important to reduce potential wound complications in total hip and total knee arthroplasty procedures. The purpose of this study was to compare the jubilee dressing method to a standard adhesive dressing.
METHOD: 124 patients (62 total hip replacements and 62 total knee replacements) were randomly selected to have either a standard adhesive dressing or jubilee method dressing. The number of dressing changes, incidence of blistering, leakage, appearance of inflammation, infection rate and the average stay in hospital was recorded for each patient.
RESULTS: The jubilee dressing significantly reduced the rate of blistering, leakage and number of dressing changes when compare to a traditional adhesive dressing (p < 0.05). The rate of inflammation and average length of stay in hospital was not significantly different between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: The authors recommend the use of this dressing for total hip and total knee arthroplasty procedures due to the associated lower complication rate.
Copyright © 2012 Tissue Viability Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22658450     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtv.2012.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Tissue Viability        ISSN: 0965-206X            Impact factor:   2.932


  6 in total

Review 1.  In search of the optimal wound dressing material following total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gaurav Sharma; Sang Wook Lee; Oliver Atanacio; Javad Parvizi; Tae Kyun Kim
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Evaluation of Absorbent Versus Conventional Wound Dressing.

Authors:  Jan Bredow; Katharina Hoffmann; Johannes Oppermann; Martin Hellmich; Peer Eysel; Kourosh Zarghooni
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 3.  Dressings for the prevention of surgical site infection.

Authors:  Jo C Dumville; Trish A Gray; Catherine J Walter; Catherine A Sharp; Tamara Page; Rhiannon Macefield; Natalie Blencowe; Thomas Kg Milne; Barnaby C Reeves; Jane Blazeby
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-12-20

4.  Clinical trial to evaluate the performance of a flexible self-adherent absorbent dressing coated with a soft silicone layer compared to a standard wound dressing after orthopedic or spinal surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jan Bredow; Johannes Oppermann; Katharina Hoffmann; Martin Hellmich; Birte Wenk; Marvin Simons; Peer Eysel; Kourosh Zarghooni
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Developing outcome measures assessing wound management and patient experience: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Daisy Elliott
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-11-26       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  AQUACEL® Ag Surgical Dressing Reduces Surgical Site Infection and Improves Patient Satisfaction in Minimally Invasive Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study.

Authors:  Feng-Chih Kuo; Bradley Chen; Mel S Lee; Shih-Hsiang Yen; Jun-Wen Wang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.