Literature DB >> 22658408

Geographic variation in pharmacotherapy decisions for U.S. Medicare enrollees with diabetes.

Michael R Sargen1, Ole J Hoffstad, Douglas J Wiebe, David J Margolis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Prescription rates for diabetic drugs vary considerably across the United States for Medicare beneficiaries. The goal of this study was to determine if non-clinical factors (patient race, ethnicity, gender, income) are associated with regional variation in pharmacotherapy decisions for diabetic patients enrolled in Medicare.
METHODS: We performed a spatially-weighted, linear regression analysis of the entire diabetic population enrolled in Medicare Parts A, B, and D for the years 2006 through 2009. Our outcomes of interest were the percentage of diabetic patients being treated with metformin, a sulfonylurea, a thiazolidinedione, or insulin within a hospital referral region (HRR).
RESULTS: Prescription rates for metformin, sulfonylureas, thiazolidinediones, and insulin varied more than two-fold between hospital referral region. Metformin prescription rates were increased in western states while prescription rates for sulfonylureas and insulins were highest in the South and Midwest. In contrast with these other diabetic drug classes, members of the thiazolidinedione drug class were prescribed more frequently in the Central United States (Great Plains, Colorado Rockies, Northern Texas, Oklahoma). Prescription rates for each drug class were increased in hospital referral regions with a lower household income. Referral regions with larger African American populations were associated with higher prescription rates for insulin (p<0.001) and lower prescription rates for metformin (p<0.001). Gender and Hispanic ethnicity were not associated with regional variation in prescription rates for the four major diabetic drug classes.
CONCLUSIONS: Geographic differences exist in the management of type 2 diabetes for Medicare enrollees. Prescription patterns were associated with household income and African American race. Further studies are necessary to identify local, unidentified factors that might be influencing provider management styles.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22658408      PMCID: PMC3398217          DOI: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2012.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Complications        ISSN: 1056-8727            Impact factor:   2.852


  27 in total

1.  Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study.

Authors:  I M Stratton; A I Adler; H A Neil; D R Matthews; S E Manley; C A Cull; D Hadden; R C Turner; R R Holman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-08-12

Review 2.  Clinical practice. Initial management of glycemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  David M Nathan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-10-24       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes: pathophysiology, frequency, and effects of different treatment modalities.

Authors:  Nicola N Zammitt; Brian M Frier
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Racial and ethnic differences in glycemic control of adults with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  M I Harris; R C Eastman; C C Cowie; K M Flegal; M S Eberhardt
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Association of hypoglycemia and cardiac ischemia: a study based on continuous monitoring.

Authors:  Cyrus Desouza; Holger Salazar; Benjamin Cheong; Joseph Murgo; Vivian Fonseca
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Preventable hospitalization among elderly Medicare beneficiaries with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Marlene R Niefeld; Joel B Braunstein; Albert W Wu; Christopher D Saudek; Wendy E Weller; Gerard F Anderson
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Prevalence of and risk factors for peripheral arterial disease in the United States: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2000.

Authors:  Elizabeth Selvin; Thomas P Erlinger
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-07-19       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Recent antihyperglycemic prescribing trends for US privately insured patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Fredric J Cohen; Cheryl A Neslusan; Jonathan E Conklin; Xue Song
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-09-12       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Efficacy of metformin in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The Multicenter Metformin Study Group.

Authors:  R A DeFronzo; A M Goodman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-08-31       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  10 in total

1.  GCKR and PPP1R3B identified as genome-wide significant loci for plasma lactate: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study.

Authors:  A Tin; P Balakrishnan; T H Beaty; E Boerwinkle; R C Hoogeveen; J H Young; W H L Kao
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 4.359

2.  Environmental and individual predictors of medication adherence among elderly patients with hypertension and chronic kidney disease: A geospatial approach.

Authors:  Yun Han; Rajiv Saran; Steven R Erickson; Richard A Hirth; Kevin He; Rajesh Balkrishnan
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2019-06-22

3.  Regional variation in use of a new class of antidiabetic medication among medicare beneficiaries: the case of incretin mimetics.

Authors:  Zachary A Marcum; Julia Driessen; Carolyn T Thorpe; Julie M Donohue; Walid F Gellad
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 3.154

4.  Geographic variation in Medicare spending and mortality for diabetic patients with foot ulcers and amputations.

Authors:  Michael R Sargen; Ole Hoffstad; David J Margolis
Journal:  J Diabetes Complications       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 2.852

5.  Cardiovascular Risk Factor Targets and Cardiovascular Disease Event Risk in Diabetes: A Pooling Project of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study, Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, and Jackson Heart Study.

Authors:  Nathan D Wong; Yanglu Zhao; Rohini Patel; Christopher Patao; Shaista Malik; Alain G Bertoni; Adolfo Correa; Aaron R Folsom; Sumesh Kachroo; Jayanti Mukherjee; Herman Taylor; Elizabeth Selvin
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Assessing factors related to the pharmacologic management of laryngeal diseases and disorders.

Authors:  Seth M Cohen; Jaewhan Kim; Nelson Roy; Mark Courey
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Mapping English GP prescribing data: a tool for monitoring health-service inequalities.

Authors:  Barry Rowlingson; Euan Lawson; Benjamin Taylor; Peter J Diggle
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  A strategy to combine pathway-targeted low toxicity drugs in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Joe R Delaney; Chandni Patel; Katelyn E McCabe; Dan Lu; Mitzie-Ann Davis; Isabelle Tancioni; Tami von Schalscha; Alena Bartakova; Carley Haft; David D Schlaepfer; Dwayne G Stupack
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-10-13

9.  Association between Metformin Use and Cancer Stage at Diagnosis among Elderly Medicare Beneficiaries with Preexisting Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Incident Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Amit D Raval; Malcolm D Mattes; Suresh Madhavan; Xiaoyun Pan; Wenhui Wei; Usha Sambamoorthi
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2016-07-31       Impact factor: 4.011

Review 10.  Changing the approach to type 2 diabetes treatment: A comparison of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sulphonylureas across the continuum of care.

Authors:  Marco Orsini Federici; Raffaella Gentilella; Antonella Corcos; Enrico Torre; Stefano Genovese
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2021-02-07       Impact factor: 4.876

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.