Literature DB >> 2265811

A biomechanical in vitro comparison of open versus percutaneous repair of tendon Achilles.

R T Hockenbury1, J C Johns.   

Abstract

A study was undertaken to compare the in vitro strengths of percutaneous Achilles tendon repair to open Achilles tendon repair. Ten fresh frozen cadaver below-the-knee specimens underwent Achilles tenotomy. The specimens were divided into two groups of five specimens each. Group I specimens underwent open Achilles repair using a Bunnell suture technique. Group II specimens underwent percutaneous repair. Each specimen was placed on an apparatus which produced progressive ankle dorsiflexion. Measurements of anastomotic gap were correlated with angle of dorsiflexion. Group I anastomoses were able to resist almost twice the amount of ankle dorsiflexion compared to Group II anastomoses (P less than .05). Entrapment of the sural nerve occurred in three out of five specimens in Group II. Percutaneous anastomoses were malaligned in four out of five specimens. Based on this study, percutaneous repair of Achilles tendon ruptures provides approximately 50% of the initial strength afforded by open repair. Percutaneous repair places the sural nerve at risk for injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2265811     DOI: 10.1177/107110079001100202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle        ISSN: 0198-0211


  27 in total

1.  Sural nerve injury associated with neglected tendo Achilles ruptures.

Authors:  M D Fletcher; P J Warren
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 2.  Development of an accelerated functional rehabilitation protocol following minimal invasive Achilles tendon repair.

Authors:  Mareen Braunstein; Sebastian F Baumbach; Wolfgang Boecker; Mike R Carmont; Hans Polzer
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Functional evaluation of professional athletes treated with a mini-open technique for achilles tendon rupture.

Authors:  Antonio Vadalà; Riccardo Maria Lanzetti; Alessandro Ciompi; Cristina Rossi; Domenico Lupariello; Andrea Ferretti
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2014-07-14

Review 4.  The ruptured Achilles tendon: a current overview from biology of rupture to treatment.

Authors:  G Thevendran; K M Sarraf; N K Patel; A Sadri; P Rosenfeld
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2013-04-02

Review 5.  [Achilles tendon rupture : Current diagnostic and therapeutic standards].

Authors:  G Hertel; J Götz; J Grifka; J Willers
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  A new less invasive surgical technique in the management of acute Achilles tendon rupture through limited-open procedure combined with a single-anchor and "circuit" suture technique.

Authors:  Hao Zhang; Pei-Zhao Liu; Xin Zhang; Chen Ding; Hao-Chen Cui; Wen-Bin Ding; Ren-Kai Wang; Da-Jiang Wu; Qiang Wei; Sheng Qin; Xue-Lin Wu; Da-Ke Tong; Guang-Chao Wang; Hao Tang; Fang Ji
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  [Percutaneous technique for Achilles tendon repair with the Dresden Instruments].

Authors:  M H Amlang; P Christiani; P Heinz; H Zwipp
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  Locating the sural nerve during calcaneal (Achilles) tendon repair with confidence: a cadaveric study with clinical applications.

Authors:  Joseph A Blackmon; Stavros Atsas; Mackenzie J Clarkson; Jacob N Fox; Blake T Daney; Sean C Dodson; H Wayne Lambert
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 1.286

9.  [Surgical treatment of Achilles tendon rupture].

Authors:  M H Amlang; N Maffuli; U G Longo; T Stübig; J Imrecke; T Hüfner
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  Open versus percutaneous repair in the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture: a randomized prospective study.

Authors:  A Gigante; A Moschini; A Verdenelli; M Del Torto; S Ulisse; L de Palma
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.