Literature DB >> 22657400

Laser heat stimulation of tiny skin areas adds valuable information to quantitative sensory testing in postherpetic neuralgia.

Marcel Franz1, Dorothee Spohn, Alexander Ritter, Roman Rolke, Wolfgang H R Miltner, Thomas Weiss.   

Abstract

Patients suffering from postherpetic neuralgia often complain about hypo- or hypersensation in the affected dermatome. The loss of thermal sensitivity has been demonstrated by quantitative sensory testing as being associated with small-fiber (Aδ- and C-fiber) deafferentation. We aimed to compare laser stimulation (radiant heat) to thermode stimulation (contact heat) with regard to their sensitivity and specificity to detect thermal sensory deficits related to small-fiber dysfunction in postherpetic neuralgia. We contrasted detection rate of laser stimuli with 5 thermal parameters (thresholds of cold/warm detection, cold/heat pain, and sensory limen) of quantitative sensory testing. Sixteen patients diagnosed with unilateral postherpetic neuralgia and 16 age- and gender-matched healthy control subjects were tested. Quantitative sensory testing and laser stimulation of tiny skin areas were performed in the neuralgia-affected skin and in the contralateral homologue of the neuralgia-free body side. Across the 5 thermal parameters of thermode stimulation, only one parameter (warm detection threshold) revealed sensory abnormalities (thermal hypoesthesia to warm stimuli) in the neuralgia-affected skin area of patients but not in the contralateral area, as compared to the control group. In contrast, patients perceived significantly less laser stimuli both in the affected skin and in the contralateral skin compared to controls. Overall, laser stimulation proved more sensitive and specific in detecting thermal sensory abnormalities in the neuralgia-affected skin, as well as in the control skin, than any single thermal parameter of thermode stimulation. Thus, laser stimulation of tiny skin areas might be a useful diagnostic tool for small-fiber dysfunction.
Copyright © 2012 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22657400     DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.04.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  6 in total

1.  [Diagnostic comparison of thermal parameters of quantitative sensory testing and laser stimulation in postherpetic neuralgia].

Authors:  M Franz; A Ritter; C Puta; W H R Miltner; T Weiss
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 2.  Can quantitative sensory testing move us closer to mechanism-based pain management?

Authors:  Yenisel Cruz-Almeida; Roger B Fillingim
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 3.750

3.  Impaired Autonomic Responses to Emotional Stimuli in Autoimmune Limbic Encephalitis.

Authors:  Olga Schröder; Elisabeth Schriewer; Kristin S Golombeck; Julia Kürten; Hubertus Lohmann; Wolfram Schwindt; Heinz Wiendl; Maximilian Bruchmann; Nico Melzer; Thomas Straube
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 4.003

4.  How stable are quantitative sensory testing measurements over time? Report on 10-week reliability and agreement of results in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Helen Nothnagel; Christian Puta; Thomas Lehmann; Philipp Baumbach; Martha B Menard; Brunhild Gabriel; Holger H W Gabriel; Thomas Weiss; Frauke Musial
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 3.133

5.  Multimodal sensory evaluation of neuropathic spinal cord injury pain: an experimental study.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Opsommer; Natalya Korogod; Lenka Stockinger; Gunther Landmann
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 2.772

6.  Somatosensory abnormalities for painful and innocuous stimuli at the back and at a site distinct from the region of pain in chronic back pain patients.

Authors:  Christian Puta; Birgit Schulz; Saskia Schoeler; Walter Magerl; Brunhild Gabriel; Holger H W Gabriel; Wolfgang H R Miltner; Thomas Weiss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.