Literature DB >> 2265663

Visual and auditory modality and suffix effects in young and elderly adults.

S K Manning1, J Greenhut-Wertz.   

Abstract

Research has shown that elderly as compared with young adults show relative deficits both in processing visually as compared with auditorily presented stimuli and in tasks having attentional components. In this study, visual and auditory presentation was compared in young and elderly adults using the suffix paradigm in which the control condition involves immediate serial recall and the experimental condition, a suffix, a not-to-be-remembered final item. The standard finding in this paradigm is called the modality effect, superior auditory as compared with visual performance in the control condition which is localized at the end of the sequence. Generally, auditory suffixes following auditory sequences reduce the modality effect while visual suffixes following visual sequences do not. The results showed generally standard modality and suffix effects for both age groups. Relatively inferior performance was present in the elderly in the visual as compared with the auditory control conditions suggesting recoding deficits in this group. Auditory suffixes following auditory sequences had a relatively greater performance effect on the elderly than the young, while visual suffixes following visual sequences did not impair the performance of either group. This suggests a modality specific attentional deficit in the elderly. Rank order correlations suggest that individuals within both age groups showing large differences in performance between auditory and visual control conditions may have relative recoding difficulties for their age. Additionally, increased susceptibility to auditory interference for elderly as compared with young subjects may be a marker of aging, while relative within-group susceptibility to auditory interference may be a deficit on the part of young subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2265663     DOI: 10.1080/03610739008253868

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Aging Res        ISSN: 0361-073X            Impact factor:   1.645


  2 in total

1.  Top-down processing and the suffix effect in young and older adults.

Authors:  Maura Pilotti; Tim Beyer; Mariya Yasunami
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-01

2.  The copy number variation landscape of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract.

Authors:  Miguel Verbitsky; Rik Westland; Alejandra Perez; Krzysztof Kiryluk; Qingxue Liu; Priya Krithivasan; Adele Mitrotti; David A Fasel; Ekaterina Batourina; Matthew G Sampson; Monica Bodria; Max Werth; Charlly Kao; Jeremiah Martino; Valentina P Capone; Asaf Vivante; Shirlee Shril; Byum Hee Kil; Maddalena Marasà; Jun Y Zhang; Young-Ji Na; Tze Y Lim; Dina Ahram; Patricia L Weng; Erin L Heinzen; Alba Carrea; Giorgio Piaggio; Loreto Gesualdo; Valeria Manca; Giuseppe Masnata; Maddalena Gigante; Daniele Cusi; Claudia Izzi; Francesco Scolari; Joanna A E van Wijk; Marijan Saraga; Domenico Santoro; Giovanni Conti; Pasquale Zamboli; Hope White; Dorota Drozdz; Katarzyna Zachwieja; Monika Miklaszewska; Marcin Tkaczyk; Daria Tomczyk; Anna Krakowska; Przemyslaw Sikora; Tomasz Jarmoliński; Maria K Borszewska-Kornacka; Robert Pawluch; Maria Szczepanska; Piotr Adamczyk; Malgorzata Mizerska-Wasiak; Grazyna Krzemien; Agnieszka Szmigielska; Marcin Zaniew; Mark G Dobson; John M Darlow; Prem Puri; David E Barton; Susan L Furth; Bradley A Warady; Zoran Gucev; Vladimir J Lozanovski; Velibor Tasic; Isabella Pisani; Landino Allegri; Lida M Rodas; Josep M Campistol; Cécile Jeanpierre; Shumyle Alam; Pasquale Casale; Craig S Wong; Fangming Lin; Débora M Miranda; Eduardo A Oliveira; Ana Cristina Simões-E-Silva; Jonathan M Barasch; Brynn Levy; Nan Wu; Friedhelm Hildebrandt; Gian Marco Ghiggeri; Anna Latos-Bielenska; Anna Materna-Kiryluk; Feng Zhang; Hakon Hakonarson; Virginia E Papaioannou; Cathy L Mendelsohn; Ali G Gharavi; Simone Sanna-Cherchi
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 38.330

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.