Literature DB >> 22655021

Geometrical effects in microfluidic-based microarrays for rapid, efficient single-cell capture of mammalian stem cells and plant cells.

Anthony Lawrenz, Francesca Nason, Justin J Cooper-White.   

Abstract

In this paper, a detailed numerical and experimental investigation into the optimisation of hydrodynamic micro-trapping arrays for high-throughput capture of single polystyrene (PS) microparticles and three different types of live cells at trapping times of 30 min or less is described. Four different trap geometries (triangular, square, conical, and elliptical) were investigated within three different device generations, in which device architecture, channel geometry, inter-trap spacing, trap size, and trap density were varied. Numerical simulation confirmed that (1) the calculated device dimensions permitted partitioned flow between the main channel and the trap channel, and further, preferential flow through the trap channel in the absence of any obstruction; (2) different trap shapes, all having the same dimensional parameters in terms of depth, trapping channel lengths and widths, main channel lengths and widths, produce contrasting streamline plots and that the interaction of the fluid with the different geometries can produce areas of stagnated flow or distorted field lines; and (3) that once trapped, any motion of the trapped particle or cell or a shift in its configuration within the trap can result in significant increases in pressures on the cell surface and variations in the shear stress distribution across the cell's surface. Numerical outcomes were then validated experimentally in terms of the impact of these variations in device design elements on the percent occupancy of the trapping array (with one or more particles or cells) within these targeted short timeframes. Limitations on obtaining high trap occupancies in the devices were shown to be primarily a result of particle aggregation, channel clogging and the trap aperture size. These limitations could be overcome somewhat by optimisation of these device design elements and other operational variables, such as the average carrier fluid velocity. For example, for the 20 μm polystyrene microparticles, the number of filled traps increased from 32% to 42% during 5-10 min experiments in devices with smaller apertures. Similarly, a 40%-60% reduction in trapping channel size resulted in an increase in the amount of filled traps, from 0% to almost 90% in 10 min, for the human bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells, and 15%-85% in 15 min for the human embryonic stem cells. Last, a reduction of the average carrier fluid velocity by 50% resulted in an increase from 80% to 92% occupancy of single algae cells in traps. Interestingly, changes in the physical properties of the species being trapped also had a substantial impact, as regardless of the trap shape, higher percent occupancies were observed with cells compared to single PS microparticles in the same device, even though they are of approximately the same size. This investigation showed that in microfluidic single cell capture arrays, the trap shape that maximizes cell viability is not necessarily the most efficient for high-speed single cell capture. However, high-speed trapping configurations for delicate mammalian cells are possible but must be optimised for each cell type and designed principally in accordance with the trap size to cell size ratio.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22655021      PMCID: PMC3360725          DOI: 10.1063/1.4704521

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomicrofluidics        ISSN: 1932-1058            Impact factor:   2.800


  21 in total

1.  Optimization of microfluidic single cell trapping for long-term on-chip culture.

Authors:  Stefan Kobel; Ana Valero; Jonas Latt; Philippe Renaud; Matthias Lutolf
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 6.799

2.  Hydrodynamic trap for single particles and cells.

Authors:  Melikhan Tanyeri; Eric M Johnson-Chavarria; Charles M Schroeder
Journal:  Appl Phys Lett       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Hydrodynamic tweezers: 1. Noncontact trapping of single cells using steady streaming microeddies.

Authors:  Barry R Lutz; Jian Chen; Daniel T Schwartz
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Mechanical stress analysis of microfluidic environments designed for isolated biological cell investigations.

Authors:  Sean S Kohles; Nathalie Nève; Jeremiah D Zimmerman; Derek C Tretheway
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Stepwise increasing and decreasing fluid shear stresses differentially regulate the functions of osteoblasts.

Authors:  Jun Pan; Tingxiu Zhang; Li Mi; Bingbing Zhang; Bin Wang; Li Yang; Linhong Deng; Liyun Wang
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.321

6.  Shear stress inhibits apoptosis of human endothelial cells.

Authors:  S Dimmeler; J Haendeler; V Rippmann; M Nehls; A M Zeiher
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1996-12-09       Impact factor: 4.124

7.  Effects of shear stress on the microalgae Chaetoceros muelleri.

Authors:  Michiel H A Michels; Atze J van der Goot; Niels-Henrik Norsker; René H Wijffels
Journal:  Bioprocess Biosyst Eng       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 3.210

8.  Microfluidic single-cell array cytometry for the analysis of tumor apoptosis.

Authors:  Donald Wlodkowic; Shannon Faley; Michele Zagnoni; John P Wikswo; Jonathan M Cooper
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 9.  Designing materials to direct stem-cell fate.

Authors:  Matthias P Lutolf; Penney M Gilbert; Helen M Blau
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  A new method for simulating the motion of individual ellipsoidal bacteria in microfluidic devices.

Authors:  Min-Cheol Kim; Catherine Klapperich
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 6.799

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Concise review: microfluidic technology platforms: poised to accelerate development and translation of stem cell-derived therapies.

Authors:  Drew M Titmarsh; Huaying Chen; Nick R Glass; Justin J Cooper-White
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 6.940

2.  A microfluidic device enabling high-efficiency single cell trapping.

Authors:  D Jin; B Deng; J X Li; W Cai; L Tu; J Chen; Q Wu; W H Wang
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 3.  Microfluidic systems for hydrodynamic trapping of cells and clusters.

Authors:  Qiyue Luan; Celine Macaraniag; Jian Zhou; Ian Papautsky
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 4.  The impact of microfluidics in high-throughput drug-screening applications.

Authors:  Paola De Stefano; Elena Bianchi; Gabriele Dubini
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 3.258

5.  Time Sequential Single-Cell Patterning with High Efficiency and High Density.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Dahai Ren; Xixin Ling; Weibin Liang; Jing Li; Zheng You; Yaxiaer Yalikun; Yo Tanaka
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.576

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.