Literature DB >> 22654895

Whole-exome sequencing and an iPSC-derived cardiomyocyte model provides a powerful platform for gene discovery in left ventricular hypertrophy.

D Zhi1, M R Irvin, C C Gu, A J Stoddard, R Lorier, A Matter, D C Rao, V Srinivasasainagendra, H K Tiwari, A Turner, U Broeckel, D K Arnett.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is a heritable predictor of cardiovascular disease, particularly in blacks.
OBJECTIVE: Determine the feasibility of combining evidence from two distinct but complementary experimental approaches to identify novel genetic predictors of increased LV mass.
METHODS: Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was conducted in seven African-American sibling trios ascertained on high average familial LV mass indexed to height (LVMHT) using Illumina HiSeq technology. Identified missense or nonsense (MS/NS) mutations were examined for association with LVMHT using linear mixed models adjusted for age, sex, body weight, and familial relationship. To functionally assess WES findings, human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (induced pluripotent stem cell-CM) were stimulated to induce hypertrophy; mRNA sequencing (RNA-seq) was used to determine gene expression differences associated with hypertrophy onset. Statistically significant findings under both experimental approaches identified LVH candidate genes. Candidate genes were further prioritized by seven supportive criteria that included additional association tests (two criteria), regional linkage evidence in the larger HyperGEN cohort (one criterion), and publically available gene and variant based annotations (four criteria).
RESULTS: WES reads covered 91% of the target capture region (of size 37.2 MB) with an average coverage of 65×. WES identified 31,426 MS/NS mutations among the 21 individuals. A total of 295 MS/NS variants in 265 genes were associated with LVMHT with q-value <0.25. Of the 265 WES genes, 44 were differentially expressed (P < 0.05) in hypertrophied cells. Among the 44 candidate genes identified, 5, including HLA-B, HTT, MTSS1, SLC5A12, and THBS1, met 3 of 7 supporting criteria. THBS1 encodes an adhesive glycoprotein that promotes matrix preservation in pressure-overload LVH. THBS1 gene expression was 34% higher in hypertrophied cells (P = 0.0003) and a predicted conserved and damaging NS variant in exon 13 (A2099G) was significantly associated with LVHMT (P = 4 × 10(-6)).
CONCLUSION: Combining evidence from cutting-edge genetic and cellular experiments can enable identification of novel LVH risk loci.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiomyocyte; exome; genomics; hypertrophy; left ventricular mass

Year:  2012        PMID: 22654895      PMCID: PMC3361011          DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2012.00092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Genet        ISSN: 1664-8021            Impact factor:   4.599


Introduction

Echocardiographic measurement of increased left ventricular (LV) mass predicts cardiovascular morbidity and mortality across demographic groups (Benjamin and Levy, 1999). Beyond the established risk factors for LV hypertrophy (LVH; race, age, hypertension, obesity), research convincingly suggests there is a genetic basis of disease (Harshfield et al., 1990). African-American populations may be enriched for risk variants as LVH burden is about twofold greater in African Americans compared to Caucasians and LV mass is strongly correlated in hypertensive African-American siblings (Arnett et al., 2001). Previous linkage (Arnett et al., 2009a; Tang et al., 2009), candidate gene (Rasmussen-Torvik et al., 2005), and genome-wide association studies (GWAS; Arnett et al., 2009b, 2011; Wineinger et al., 2011) in carefully ascertained and well characterized African-American cohorts have uncovered significant LVH risk loci; however, these loci explain only a fraction of the phenotypic variation attributable to familial inheritance. Advances in targeted capture and high throughput sequencing have recently made whole-exome sequencing (WES) affordable for clinical studies and offer advantages over array-based genotyping for the identification of novel disease-associated loci. The approach has proved powerful for the study of Mendelian disease where the identification of rare, mostly coding mutations clustering in patients is achieved through strict, discrete bioinformatics filters (Robinson et al., 2011). Indeed, this approach has been applied to identify genes underlying familial dilated cardiomyopathy (Norton et al., 2011) and others (Ng et al., 2010a,b; Majewski et al., 2011). Recently, this approach has been extended to non-Mendelian disease (O’Roak et al., 2011; Ramagopalan et al., 2011; Kim et al., 2012). It has been suggested that rare variation within pedigrees can contribute substantially to the heritability of common traits, offering advantages to family based designs (Manolio et al., 2009; Shi and Rao, 2011) such as the non-random ascertainment of extreme phenotype families (Shi and Rao, 2011). The application of WES to uncover genes associated with cardiovascular disease-related quantitative traits such as those that measure LVH has not yet been reported. A major challenge of genomic studies is the functional assessment of a statistically significant finding in the relevant tissue, which, in the case of LVH, is cardiomyocytes. Until the recent development of stem cell technology, human adult cardiomyocytes were generally not available for functional analyses. Although human adult ventricular myocytes can be cultured, they are not optimal for biochemical and molecular biologic investigations (Berry et al., 2007). Recently, the use of human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived cardiomyocytes allows direct interrogation of the molecular mechanisms occurring in these cells under differing experimental conditions. Further, this model system aims to provide the ability to identify disease pathways and therapeutic targets, which could ultimately lead to more specific, tailored LVH treatment. Therefore, an approach using WES in combination with functional studies in iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes can provide a powerful platform for disease gene discovery. In the current study we conducted WES to isolate novel loci for LVH in seven hypertensive African-American sibling trios from the Hypertension Genetic Epidemiology Network (HyperGEN) that were enriched for increased LV mass. Concurrently, we implemented an experimental protocol using a novel LVH model system based on human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes. These cardiomyocytes were subjected to conditions to produce hypertrophy, and mRNA expression was measured in comparison to control cardiomyocytes generated from the same iPSC line. We show combining results from WES and differential gene expression in the LVH model system, may identify novel candidate genes supported by statistical and annotation-based criteria.

Materials and Methods

Study population

The HyperGEN study has been previously described (Williams et al., 2000). Briefly, HyperGEN is part of the Family Blood Pressure Program funded by the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute and was designed to study the genetics of hypertension and related conditions. Families were drawn from population-based cohorts or the community-at-large if sibships had ≥2 siblings who had been diagnosed with hypertension before age 60. The study was later extended to include siblings and offspring of the original sibpairs. Hypertension was defined as current antihypertensive medication use or having an average systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg measured at two clinic visits. Two of four centers (AL, NC) recruited 1,264 African Americans making up 470 families. This study was approved by all local institutional review boards (University of Minnesota’s Human Research Protection Program Institutional Review Board, University of Alabama at Birmingham’s Institutional Review Board for Human Use, University of Utah’s Institutional Review Board, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill’s Office of Human Research Ethics Biomedical Institutional Review Board, Boston University’s Medical Campus Institutional Review Board, Medical College of Wisconsin’s Institutional Review Board); all subjects gave informed consent. In the current study, seven African-American sibling trios with history of hypertension and average age <55 years ascertained on the highest average familial LVMHT were selected for exome sequencing.

Blood pressure measurement and antihypertensive medications

Systolic and diastolic blood pressure is reported as the average of the second and third measures of a series of six sitting blood pressure measurements. Antihypertensive medication treatment was defined as use of drug(s) belonging to one of the following six classes at the time of the study including diuretics, ace inhibitors, beta blockers, alpha blockers, calcium channel blockers, and angiotensin 2 receptor antagonists.

Echocardiography

Doppler, two-dimensional (2D), and M-mode (2D-guided) echocardiograms were performed following a standardized protocol previously described (Devereux and Roman, 1995). Certified sonographers from each center were trained at the echocardiography reading center (New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center). Measurements were made at the echocardiography reading center using a computerized review station equipped with a digitizing tablet and monitor overlay used for calibration and quantification (Digisonics, Inc., Houston, TX, USA). LVM was calculated using end-diastolic dimensions by an anatomically validated formula and indexed to height (m2.7; Devereux et al., 1984).

Whole-exome sequencing

Exome capture

Using Agilent SureSelect All Exome Capture 21, index-tagged, paired-end libraries were prepared. As recommended, 3 μg of genomic DNA diluted in 1× Low TE was sheared using a Covaris instrument with a subsequent end repair step. Prior to end repair, 1 μL of DNA was analyzed on an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer DNA 1000 chip. All samples recovered at least 2 μg of DNA post-shearing and had an electropherogram distribution peak between 150 and 200 nucleotides on the DNA 1000 chip. After end repair, the samples were purified using Agencourt AMPure XP beads, and the purified DNA then had “A” Bases added to the 3′ end of the DNA fragments. After “A” base addition, the DNA was again purified with AMPure XP beads. Ligation of the indexing-specific, paired-end adapter was done, and the product was AMPure XP bead purified, then PCR amplified using the Illumina InPE1.0 (forward) PCR primer and the SureSelect Indexing Pre-Capture PCR primer. For PCR, five cycles of amplification were used. After PCR amplification, amplified product was AMPure XP bead purified and 1 μL was analyzed on an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer DNA 1000 chip. All samples showed an electropherogram distribution peak between 250 and 275 nucleotides on the DNA 1000 chip and had a concentration of at least 147 ng/μL. For hybridization, all samples needed to be at a concentration of 147 ng/μL. To achieve this, an Eppendorf Vacufuge Plus concentrator was used to completely lyophilize the samples. Using the concentrations calculated from results obtained with the DNA 1000 chip, an appropriate amount of nuclease-free water was added to each sample post-complete lyophilization to bring the concentration to 147 ng/μL. Hybridization using the Agilent Hybridization protocol and the Agilent SureSelect All Exome Capture Library was performed. Hybridization was stopped at 24 h. All samples contained at least 20 μL, indicating an optimal capture, and samples were then bead selected using the SureSelect selection protocol utilizing Dynal MyOne Streptavidin T1 (Invitrogen) magnetic beads. Once selected, the captured libraries were then AMPure XP bead purified and Index barcode tags were added. As recommended for pooling two samples of our capture size, Agilent Index’s #6 (GCCAAT) and #12 (CTTGTA) were used. Each sample received one tag, with half of the samples receiving #6 and the other half #12, one bar-coded with #6 and one with #12, and pooled together on one sequencing flow cell lane. During addition of the index tag, the libraries were amplified with SureSelect Indexing Post-Capture PCR (Forward) Primer and Index PCR (Reverse) Primer, with the Index PCR Primer being the sample-specific index barcode tag. For PCR, 16 cycles of amplification were used. The prepared libraries were AMPure XP bead purified and 1 μL of library was run out on an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer DNA High Sensitivity chip. All samples had an electropherogram distribution peak between 300 and 325 nucleotides on the DNA High Sensitivity chip. To more accurately quantify the libraries for pooling, samples were quantified using the Agilent QPCR NGS Library Quantification Kit. After quantification samples were pooled to a volume of 20 μL with an equimolar amount of 10 nM, following Agilent’s multiplexing pooling protocol. Each pool was spiked with 1% phiX control to improve base calling while sequencing, as was recommended by Illumina for pooling of two libraries.

Illumina sequencing

Following Illumina HiSeq sequencing and cBot protocols, each of the pooled, multiplexed, index-tagged, paired-end libraries was denatured, underwent cluster generation onto a HiSeq v1.5 flow cell and was sequenced. Each of the 10 nM libraries was denatured using the 4–8 pM procedure to generate a final concentration of 5 or 7 pM to load per lane for cluster generation. Once cluster generation onto flow cells was complete, samples were sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq Sequencing Kit (200 cycles) and multiplexing sequencing chemistry.

Exome read mapping and variant calling method

Basecalling, demultiplexing, read mapping, and initial SNP calling were done using Illumina’s CASAVA v1.7 software. Read mapping was to the whole autosomal sequence from UCSC hg19 (also known as GRCh37), using the default parameters to the ELAND2 program. Autosomal SNPs were called using the CASAVA v1.7 variant caller with default parameters, except that the chromosomal coverage variation filter was turned off to account for exome capture. SNPs were called where the CASAVA v1.7 score was greater than the default threshold of 10. Genotypes calling at the SNP sites (variant calling) were done by the SAMTools program v0.1.7-6 (r530; Li et al., 2009; Li, 2011). Multi-sampling joint variant calling for all SNP sites discovered by CASAVA was carried out by the mpileup command line with the default parameters. Genotype calls in the target capture region with PHRED-like genotype quality score GQ ≥ 30, totaling 102,089 variants sites, were annotated by the ANNOVAR program (version 2010-12-02; Wang et al., 2010) against the UCSC hg19 refGene annotation.

Statistical and bioinformatics methods for whole-exome sequencing

In order to identify missense or nonsense (MS/NS) single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) associated with LVMHT we conducted a mixed model regression with LVMHT as the dependent variable controlling for kinship structures as well as age, sex, and weight as covariates using the kinship R package program LMEKIN (Lourenco et al., 2011). We used a false discovery rate (FDR) criterion of q-value <0.25 (P-value <0.00258) for significance; this is more flexible than the usual Bonferroni criterion given our small sample size (N = 21).

Induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocyte experiments

Cell culture

For the cardiomyocyte studies, we utilized human iCell™ Cardiomyocytes derived from iPSCs (Cellular Dynamics International, Madison, WI, USA). iCells were recovered from frozen culture as recommended by the manufacturer and allowed to recover at least 12 days in iCell Maintenance Medium (iCMM) before experimentation. For experiments, cells were plated at 1.5 × 105 cells/well in iCMM, as recommended by the manufacturer for cell-based assays, and grown in pre-coated (0.1% gelatin solution), 12-well dishes at 37°C in a 95% air: 7% CO2 humidified atmosphere. After 14 days of recovery, iCells were washed twice with warmed PBS and starved in iCell serum-free Maintenance Medium (iCSM) for 48 h, then stimulated in iCMM, as described below.

Cellular model of LVH

Human iCell Cardiomyocytes were plated to confluence, allowed to recover before starving for 48 h, and stimulated with an established stimulant for the beta-adrenergic system, isopreterenol (ISO), for up to 72 h. As a correlate of developing LV hypertrophy, cell culture changes in cell surface area were measured. At least 200 randomly selected stimulated cells were measured as well as unstimulated controls. As shown in Figure 1, our data demonstrate that iCell Cardiomyocytes respond to hypertrophic stimuli by a clear and significant increase in relative cell size (ISO treatment versus control P = 0.0043). We also observed an up-regulation of hypertrophy markers such as intermediate-early genes C-FOS and C-JUN measured by immunochemistry (Lijnen and Petrov, 1999). Together, these data demonstrate successful establishment of a myocyte hypertrophy model in iPS cell-derived cardiomyocytes representative of the hypertrophy phenotype.
Figure 1

(A) Relative cell size of iCell cardiomyocytes under isoproterenol (ISO) hypertrophic stimulation versus control cells. (B) Photographs of iCell cardiomyocytes after hypertrophic stimulation versus controls.

(A) Relative cell size of iCell cardiomyocytes under isoproterenol (ISO) hypertrophic stimulation versus control cells. (B) Photographs of iCell cardiomyocytes after hypertrophic stimulation versus controls.

Stimulation, cell harvest, and RNA extraction

iCells were stimulated for 72 h with ISO (10−5 M; Sigma Aldrich), replenishing every 24 h. After stimulation, cells were harvested with Trizol reagent and the Purlink™ RNA Mini Kit (Invitrogen). Total RNA was extracted per manufacturer’s recommendations, resuspended in nuclease-free water, and quantified/checked for integrity by UV spectrophotometry (NanoDrop™ 2000, Thermo Scientific).

RNA sequencing

Six paired-end cDNA libraries (three biological replicates of control iPSC cardiomyocytes, three biological replicates of isoproterenol stimulated cardiomyocytes) were prepared and sequenced using Illumina TruSeq RNA Sample Preparation Kit. Total RNA was extracted and quantified. Following the TruSeq RNA sample preparation low-throughput protocol, 500 ng of total RNA was used to generate index-tagged paired-end cDNA libraries. During library preparation samples were each tagged with Agilent Index #2 (CGATGT), #4 (TGACCA), #5 (ACAGTG), or #6 (GCCAAT). After cDNA libraries were generated using the sample preparation kit, quality of the libraries was checked using 1 μL of sample run on an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer DNA 1000 chip. All samples showed an electropherogram peak at ∼260 base pair. Samples were then quantified using the Agilent QPCR NGS Library Quantification Kit. After quantification, samples were pooled for multiplexing to a volume of 20 μL with an equimolar amount of 10 nM, following Agilent’s multiplexing pooling protocol. Each pool was spiked with 1% phiX control to improve base calling while sequencing, as was recommended by Illumina for pooling of two libraries. Following Illumina HiSeq sequencing and cBot protocols, each of the pooled, multiplexed, index-tagged, paired-end libraries was denatured, underwent cluster generation onto a HiSeq v1.5 flow cell and was sequenced. Each of the 10 nM libraries was denatured using the 4–8 pM procedure to generate a final concentration of 6 pM to load per lane for cluster generation. Once cluster generation onto flow cells was complete, samples were sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq Sequencing Kit (200 cycles) and multiplexing sequencing chemistry.

RNA-seq assembly

Six paired-end cDNA libraries were sequenced (three biological replicates of control iPSC cardiomyocytes, three biological replicates of isoproterenol stimulated cardiomyocytes). Basecalling and demultiplexing were performed using CASAVA v1.8 from Ilumina. Paired-end fastq sequence reads from each sample were assembled against hg19 using the splicing aligner Tophat v1.3.1 (Trapnell et al., 2009) with the Illumina-supplied hg19 gene-model annotation file (gtf annotation).

RNA-seq differential expression

Splice-aligned reads were assigned to gene models using the software package HTSeq v0.5.3p3 (http://www-huber.embl.de/users/anders/HTSeq) and the hg19 gtf annotation. Fold-change and differential expression significance values were calculated from gene-level read counts using the DESeq Bioconductor R package v1.2.1 (Anders and Huber, 2010).

Bioinformatic and statistical methods for prioritization of candidate genes

Variants with an association with LVMHT of q-value <0.25 are designated as candidate variants. For each candidate variant, its minor allele frequency (MAF) among African Americans in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (ESP) was obtained from the ESP exome variant server v.0.0.6 http://snp.gs.washington.edu/EVS/ (released September 9, 2011); its GERP score and PolyPhen score were obtained from the SeattleSeqAnnotation131.

Candidate gene prioritization strategy

Information from different statistical analyses and bioinformatic functional annotations were used to generate a composite measure similar to that described by Gu et al. (2007) about the relevance of candidate genes for their potential roles in LVH. We prioritized candidate genes (identified through the intersection of WES findings and differential RNA expression in the cellular model of LVH) by the following seven criteria.

Variant association after exclusion of outlying case (P20)

Many candidate variants significantly associated with LVMHT after correction for multiple testing described above are influenced by an extreme case with LVMHT of 114 g/m2.7 whom we considered may harbor important LVH variants. However, this individual will also harbor false positive findings so we additionally considered the association of candidate variants after exclusion of the extreme case using the regression models described above (N = 20). Add 1 to the composite prioritization score if any candidate variant P < 0.05, otherwise 0. Rationale: More weight is given to variants that are associated with LVMHT both with and without the most extreme case considered.

Gene-based association (GB)

We calculated gene-based P-values for the association of a genetic score with LVMHT for 21 individuals. Gene-based genetic score was calculated as the weighted sum of variants, similar to Madsen and Browning (2009). Genetic score for gene j was defined as where K is the number MS/NS variants in the gene, I is the minor allele counts at variant i, n is the number of individuals among 21 having a high quality genotype calling, and p is the MAF of African Americans in ESP. For alleles with frequency 0 in ESP, we used an allele frequency of 0.0002, corresponding to the lowest allele frequency in the ESP exome collection, 1 heterozygous among ∼2,500 individuals. If only one missense or non-synonymous variant was present in a gene, the gene-based P-value was set to 1. Association of the gene-based score with LVMHT was tested using mixed linear regression similarly to the single-variant analysis described. Add 1 to the composite prioritization score if P < 0.05, otherwise 0. Rationale: Allelic heterogeneity may be a probable scenario for common disease where multiple rare variation considered together may explain a larger portion of the genetic basis of disease (Madsen and Browning, 2009).

Conservation (GERP)

We considered the highest Genomic Evolutionary Rate Profiling (GERP) score (Davydov et al., 2010) among all candidate variants. We added 1 to the composite prioritization score if GERP score ≥5, otherwise 0. Rationale: GERP can be used to characterize genomic regions that have been subjected to purifying selection and are enriched for functional elements that may be predisposing to human disease (Cooper et al., 2005).

Functional annotation (PH)

We used the Polymorphism Phenotyping (PolyPhen) annotation of candidate variants. We added 1 to the composite prioritization score if any of candidate gene variant was annotated as “probably damaging,” otherwise 0. Rationale: PolyPhen is predictive of the possible impact of an amino acid substitution on the structure and function of a human protein using physical and comparative considerations (Ramensky et al., 2002).

Minor allele frequency

We considered the minimal MAF of all candidate variants among African Americans from the NHLBI exome sequencing project (ESP). Add 1 to the composite prioritization score if MAF <0.01, otherwise 0. Rationale: Rare frequency of an SNV in a general reference population suggests enrichment of the SNV in an extreme phenotype population may be related to disease (Madsen and Browning, 2009).

Gene expression in cardiomyocyte (GNF)

GNF GeneAtlas2 (Su et al., 2004) gene expression was obtained from the UCSC genome browser database. Add 1 to the composite prioritization score if expression score >1, otherwise 0. Rationale: This confirms expression in the relevant disease tissue.

Information from existing linkage studies (Linkage)

Existing linkage analysis results for LV mass of the HyperGEN cohort was obtained from the results of a previous work in HyperGEN (Arnett et al., 2009a). Linkage peaks of LOD >1.75 were considered a hit (Rao and Province, 2000). We added 1 to the composite prioritization score if gene was within 50 kb region centered at a linkage hit, otherwise 0. Rationale: Linkage constitutes an independent statistical genetic approach for identifying rare and functional variants within multiply affected families.

Results

Table 1 presents demographic and phenotypic data measured for each of the seven sibling trios. Hypertension was well controlled in this population by medication. The average number of antihypertensive medications reported at the time of blood pressure measurement was 1.7 ± 1. In comparison to the entire HyperGEN African-American stratum (N = 1264, average LVMHT 42 ± 12 g/m2.7 and 25% LVH) this subset is enriched for LVH (LVMHT 59 ± 16 g/m2.7 and 66% LVH; Arnett et al., 2011). Additionally, intra-family LVH case counts ranging from 1 to 3 provided phenotypic variability necessary for gene-to-trait association analyses.
Table 1

Phenotypic values for seven hypertensive African-American sibling trios.

Family
1234567
Age, years46.6 (6)46.6 (3)43.6 (2)43.3 (4)45.3 (4)42.6 (7)52.6 (4)
Sex, number of females2332131
Weight, kg91.3 (12)75.6 (3)118.9 (18)61.8 (14)121.8 (21)93.6 (6)97.0 (9)
Height, m1.7 (0.2)1.6 (0.02)1.7 (0.04)1.6 (0.08)1.7 (0.1)1.6 (0.04)1.7 (0.1)
Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg87 (7)142 (37)140 (32)137 (20)152 (7)113 (18)142 (21)
Diastolic blood pressure, mm Hg53 (8)82 (20)83 (22)85 (9)89 (9)70 (2)80 (9)
LV mass (indexed to height), g/m2.748.5 (7)72.0 (36)61.3 (16)49.7 (6)63.9 (9)52.9 (7)64.4 (10)
LV hypertrophy*1221323

Data are mean (SD) or counts.

*LV mass (indexed to height), g/m.

Phenotypic values for seven hypertensive African-American sibling trios. Data are mean (SD) or counts. *LV mass (indexed to height), g/m. Whole-exome sequencing reads covered 91% of the 37.2 MB target capture region with an average coverage of 65× (Table 2). After applying variant calling and quality control filters described we identified 102,089 SNVs among the 21 individuals (Table 3). Of those variants, 31,426 are MS/NS mutations (Table 4) which were examined for association with LVMHT. For tallies of variant type and total per individual, see Table 3.
Table 2

Basic statistics of exome sequencing per sample.

SamplePercent of captured region with read depthAverage coverage of captured region, ×
≥8×≥10×≥20×
A2055939284 90
A2057888569 39
A2058929081 73
A2140939183 85
A2153888569 38
A2154898672 43
A2614898772 43
A2639898671 42
A2640908774 48
A2803918876 51
A2804888570 41
A2855918977 54
A3167888571 43
A3168939183 81
A3169929279 60
A3170949285 94
A3174928979 57
A3177939184 88
A3234939285109
A3235939184 98
A3254929183 90
Average918978 65
Table 3

Number of variants within individual by category.

FamilySample #IntronicIntergenicUtrNcrnaUp_down_streamExonicSynonymousNon-synonymousSplicingStopAll
4698A20558,7247431,00786112419,76010,6958,9763108631,497
4698A20577,98870092878810618,4499,8648,4902819229,235
4698A20588,49374897684111018,84910,1268,6472697430,289
4136A21408,65277899589611519,40010,3248,9822989031,112
4136A21537,99966789481210218,62510,0028,5362528429,374
4136A21548,18571392881111918,87110,0468,7352878829,900
4284A26148,18468794483310919,12410,3178,7123029230,156
4284A26398,13971997381610718,92910,2338,6032958929,956
4284A26408,31172097183811519,12310,2858,7442829130,352
4864A28038,27468995183510919,18510,3058,7912938630,315
4864A28047,99268792979111718,5359,9858,4612778729,327
4864A28558,32068297585010619,40810,4528,85331610030,621
5062A31678,127660901815 9818,4919,8948,5002819429,374
5062A31688,66276596290412719,44910,4508,9063109031,153
5062A31748,60673598180312519,47210,4578,9273038531,000
5067A31698,3766611,02385413319,14010,4358,6263047630,466
5067A31708,6367441,01890413319,47310,5408,8553197431,191
5067A31778,6047231,01988613219,36710,4088,8672978831,008
  85A32348,7717431,00891711119,42310,4028,9363118431,243
  85A32358,7097221,01790411219,35310,3578,9072918731,085
  85A32548,65771299088711819,07510,2248,7693037930,708
Total27,8492,3093,3072,99938964,86833,43331,0571,070369102,089
Table 4

Genetic variants found by WES and annotated by ANNOVAR.

Variant typeNo. variantsGenes represented
Intronic27,8499,374
Intergenic2,309NA
UTR3,2722,751
ncRNA2,9991,001
Up_down_stream389308
Splicing:intronic151150
Unknown252NA
Exonic64,86813,796
  Synonymous33,43311,722
  Non-synonymous31,05710,268
  Stop369339
  Unknown95
All102,08918,127

UTR, untranslated region; ncRNA, non-coding RNA. See Table .

Basic statistics of exome sequencing per sample. Number of variants within individual by category. Genetic variants found by WES and annotated by ANNOVAR. UTR, untranslated region; ncRNA, non-coding RNA. See Table . Regression analyses yielded 295 MS/NS candidate variants in 265 genes (“WES genes”) that passed significance criteria for multiple testing (see Supplementary Material). DEseq RNA differential expression results revealed a total of 44 of the 265 WES genes were also differentially expressed with P < 0.05 in the iPSC model of LVH (see Supplementary Material). Those 44 “candidate genes” were further prioritized based on 7 supportive criteria (Table 5). We focus here on five genes that satisfy at least three of the seven criteria in Table 5. Among these five genes are major histocompatibility complex, class I, B (HLA-B), huntingtin (HTT), metastasis suppressor 1 (MTSS1), solute carrier family 5 (sodium/glucose cotransporter), member 12 (SLC5A12), and thrombospondin 1 (THBS1). Adjustment of DEseq P-values (Padj) for the genome-wide list of tested genes (N = 11,746 genes expressed in at least one experimental condition) yielded 11 of 44 of candidate genes significantly differently expressed (Padj < 0.05) including THBS1 (Padj = 0.009), but not any of the remaining prioritized candidates.
Table 5

Candidate gene (.

GeneVariant countP20GBGERPPHMAFGNFLinkageTotal
HLA-B3411001003
HTT601101003
MTSS1400101103
SLC5A12201001103
THBS1300110103
ATP11B400101002
COL6A31600010102
DICER1200001012
GLTPD1100001102
MCM6100101002
MDGA2201100002
MLL31600101002
NIN610010002
PAPPA400001102
RSAD2301001002
ST8SIA5201001002
TXLNB810001002
UGGT1301000002
DCHS22710000001
DDX11700001001
EMCN100000101
IL33200000101
IPO8200001001
IQGAP3710000001
KDM4C600010001
KDM5A401000001
KRCC1200100001
METTL3100001001
POLR1A800100001
SLC24A5100100001
SLC45A2201000001
SMC2200100001
SPPL2A100010001
SYNE13200100001
TTBK2500001001
ASTN2100000000
CHD6400000000
MAP3K6600000000
MAP9400000000
NASP200000000
PCNX200000000
PER3800000000
TMEM52200000000
USP8200000000

P20, variant is associated with the phenotype with .

Candidate gene (. P20, variant is associated with the phenotype with .

Discussion

Whole-exome sequencing provides new genetic information by identifying rare and potentially novel protein-coding variants not available on existing genotyping microarrays. Like previous genomic studies, the functional assessment of novel gene variants associated with LVH pathology identified through WES poses significant challenges. Here we present the first WES analysis of any common, quantitative trait in an African-American sample. We identified 295 variants in 265 genes associated with LV mass indexed to height through WES in 7 hypertensive sibling trios. To functionally assess our findings, we combined evidence obtained using RNA sequencing in a molecular model of LVH using human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes. Using this approach we discovered 44 genes with evidence of a role in disease pathology and statistical association with LVMHT. We refined the list to five genes applying a prioritization strategy incorporating statistical and annotation-based bioinformatic filters. Among the five genes, THBS1 has previously been shown to promote matrix preservation and prevent chamber dilation in an animal model of LVH (Vanhoutte and Heymans, 2011; Xia et al., 2011) while the other genes are novel LVH candidates. Due to several limitations the findings presented in this manuscript are suggestive. Still we provide proof of concept that a novel cellular model of LVH is a promising platform for the functional assessment of genes highlighted via genomic discovery efforts. THBS1 is an adhesive glycoprotein that mediates cell-to-cell and cell-to-matrix interactions. It inhibits angiogenesis and activates latent transforming growth factor beta, a protein related to cellular differentiation in many tissues. In a recent report, THBS1-null mice had accentuated cardiac hypertrophy (Xia et al., 2011). In the RNA-seq experiment we observed a 1.34-fold increase in THBS1 expression (P = 0.003) after ISO stimulation (see Supplementary Material) consistent with the up-regulation of the protein in disease. These points make genetic disruption of the protein in humans an interesting topic for follow-up research. Among the remaining genes we report on, MTSS1 functions in cell proliferation. It is a suspected scaffold protein that interacts with multiple partners to regulate actin dynamics; its down-regulation has been observed in multiple cancer types (Xie et al., 2011). HLA-B is part of a family of genes making up the immune system’s HLA complex which aids in the body’s reaction to a wide range of pathogens. A SNP near HLA-B (rs2523586) was recently shown to be associated (P = 1 × 10−6) with diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in African Americans as part of the Candidate Gene Association Resource (CARe) consortium (N = 8,592) although this effect did not replicate in an independent African-American population (Fox et al., 2011). Trinucleotide repeats in HTT are known to cause Huntington’s disease, although a biological link to LVH is unlikely. Finally, SLC5A12 is a sodium-coupled monocarboxylate transporter indicated in the renal handling of lactate and urate (Thangaraju et al., 2006; Ganapathy et al., 2008). Uric acid has a strong link to CVD and hyperuricemia has been linked to ventricular remodeling in an animal model (Chen et al., 2011; Isik et al., 2012). We note several limitations to our study. Specifically, our sample size was small and not sufficiently powered to identify single genes and variants associated with LV mass solely through statistical modeling approaches. Additionally, we did not directly test the functional effect of the identified variants using the human iPSC-derived cardiomyocyte model of LVH, rather we relied on differential RNA expression of the corresponding gene to suggest variant functional association to the observed pathology. Many questions remain whether the expression pattern in a cell culture model fully resembles the molecular changes of cardiomyocytes in a complex organ such as the heart (Kong et al., 2010). However, we and others (Carvajal-Vergara et al., 2010) have observed well established changes previously described as characteristic for LVH. Plus, iPSC cardiomyocytes have been used extensively for the study of other cardiovascular disease phenotypes, for example human cardiac cellular electrophysiology (Yokoo et al., 2009; Moretti et al., 2010; Germanguz et al., 2011; Itzhaki et al., 2011). Finally, we employed several cutoff criteria throughout our procedures which, if altered, could influence our findings. This includes FDR criteria for variant association with LVMHT and an un-weighted candidate gene prioritization strategy. Therefore, some false positive and alternatively, false negative findings, may have resulted and further replication is required. Still, we present a procedure designed to limit such false findings by combining evidence from genetic and cellular experiments and further prioritizing our results based on rich evidence from existing studies and publically available databases. In conclusion, we employed an innovative, iterative approach to identify protein-coding variants associated with LVH in African-American hypertensives. The identified genes with significant variants are linked to cell proliferation, cell adhesion, solute handing, and injury repair. One candidate, THBS1, is involved in injury response in multiple tissues, has been linked to cardiac hypertrophy in an animal model, and is upregulated in our novel cellular model of disease. Results necessitate replication and questions remain about the mechanistic relevance of the specific variants in the detected genes, however the results presented support the expansion of this research. Ultimately, we describe how progress in the discovery of genetic risk factors for LVH may benefit from a tiered approach that integrates evidence from new and existing data including a novel cellular model of LVH.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at http://www.frontiersin.org/Applied_Genetic_Epidemiology/10.3389/fgene.2012.00092/abstract
  49 in total

Review 1.  Translational potential of human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells for myocardial repair: insights from experimental models.

Authors:  Chi-Wing Kong; Fadi G Akar; Ronald A Li
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 5.249

2.  Distribution and intensity of constraint in mammalian genomic sequence.

Authors:  Gregory M Cooper; Eric A Stone; George Asimenos; Eric D Green; Serafim Batzoglou; Arend Sidow
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-06-17       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Genetic and environmental influences on echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in black twins.

Authors:  G A Harshfield; C E Grim; C Hwang; D D Savage; S J Anderson
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 2.689

4.  Optimum designs for next-generation sequencing to discover rare variants for common complex disease.

Authors:  Gang Shi; D C Rao
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 2.135

5.  Patient-specific induced pluripotent stem-cell models for long-QT syndrome.

Authors:  Alessandra Moretti; Milena Bellin; Andrea Welling; Christian Billy Jung; Jason T Lam; Lorenz Bott-Flügel; Tatjana Dorn; Alexander Goedel; Christian Höhnke; Franz Hofmann; Melchior Seyfarth; Daniel Sinnecker; Albert Schömig; Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  A gene atlas of the mouse and human protein-encoding transcriptomes.

Authors:  Andrew I Su; Tim Wiltshire; Serge Batalov; Hilmar Lapp; Keith A Ching; David Block; Jie Zhang; Richard Soden; Mimi Hayakawa; Gabriel Kreiman; Michael P Cooke; John R Walker; John B Hogenesch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-04-09       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Human non-synonymous SNPs: server and survey.

Authors:  Vasily Ramensky; Peer Bork; Shamil Sunyaev
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data.

Authors:  Kai Wang; Mingyao Li; Hakon Hakonarson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Exome sequencing identifies MLL2 mutations as a cause of Kabuki syndrome.

Authors:  Sarah B Ng; Abigail W Bigham; Kati J Buckingham; Mark C Hannibal; Margaret J McMillin; Heidi I Gildersleeve; Anita E Beck; Holly K Tabor; Gregory M Cooper; Heather C Mefford; Choli Lee; Emily H Turner; Joshua D Smith; Mark J Rieder; Koh-Ichiro Yoshiura; Naomichi Matsumoto; Tohru Ohta; Norio Niikawa; Deborah A Nickerson; Michael J Bamshad; Jay Shendure
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Standardization of M-mode echocardiographic left ventricular anatomic measurements.

Authors:  R B Devereux; E M Lutas; P N Casale; P Kligfield; R R Eisenberg; I W Hammond; D H Miller; G Reis; M H Alderman; J H Laragh
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  11 in total

1.  Differential interactions of missing in metastasis and insulin receptor tyrosine kinase substrate with RAB proteins in the endocytosis of CXCR4.

Authors:  Lushen Li; Shaneen S Baxter; Peng Zhao; Ning Gu; Xi Zhan
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Salt-inducible kinase 1 maintains HDAC7 stability to promote pathologic cardiac remodeling.

Authors:  Austin Hsu; Qiming Duan; Sarah McMahon; Yu Huang; Sarah Ab Wood; Nathanael S Gray; Biao Wang; Benoit G Bruneau; Saptarsi M Haldar
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 3.  Molecular Approaches in HFpEF: MicroRNAs and iPSC-Derived Cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Alison J Kriegel; Melanie Gartz; Muhammad Z Afzal; Willem J de Lange; J Carter Ralphe; Jennifer L Strande
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells From Hypertensive Patient-Derived Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells to Advance Hypertension Pharmacogenomics.

Authors:  Nikolett M Biel; Katherine E Santostefano; Bayli B DiVita; Nihal El Rouby; Santiago D Carrasquilla; Chelsey Simmons; Mahito Nakanishi; Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoff; Julie A Johnson; Naohiro Terada
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 6.940

5.  A methodology to identify and prioritize gene candidates for human disease.

Authors:  Jesus Sainz
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 6.  G-protein Coupled Receptor Signaling in Pluripotent Stem Cell-derived Cardiovascular Cells: Implications for Disease Modeling.

Authors:  Nazanin F Dolatshad; Nicola Hellen; Richard J Jabbour; Sian E Harding; Gabor Földes
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2015-12-09

7.  A combined linkage, microarray and exome analysis suggests MAP3K11 as a candidate gene for left ventricular hypertrophy.

Authors:  Claudia Tamar Silva; Irina V Zorkoltseva; Maartje N Niemeijer; Marten E van den Berg; Najaf Amin; Ayşe Demirkan; Elisa van Leeuwen; Adriana I Iglesias; Laura B Piñeros-Hernández; Carlos M Restrepo; Jan A Kors; Anatoly V Kirichenko; Rob Willemsen; Ben A Oostra; Bruno H Stricker; André G Uitterlinden; Tatiana I Axenovich; Cornelia M van Duijn; Aaron Isaacs
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 3.063

8.  The Histone Demethylase JMJD2A Modulates the Induction of Hypertrophy Markers in iPSC-Derived Cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Wendy Rosales; Fernando Lizcano
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 4.599

9.  Whole-Exome Sequencing and hiPSC Cardiomyocyte Models Identify MYRIP, TRAPPC11, and SLC27A6 of Potential Importance to Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in an African Ancestry Population.

Authors:  Marguerite R Irvin; Praful Aggarwal; Steven A Claas; Lisa de Las Fuentes; Anh N Do; C Charles Gu; Andrea Matter; Benjamin S Olson; Amit Patki; Karen Schwander; Joshua D Smith; Vinodh Srinivasasainagendra; Hemant K Tiwari; Amy J Turner; Deborah A Nickerson; Dabeeru C Rao; Ulrich Broeckel; Donna K Arnett
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 4.599

10.  Clinical correlates and heritability of cardiac mechanics: The HyperGEN study.

Authors:  Sadiya S Khan; Kwang-Youn A Kim; Jie Peng; Frank G Aguilar; Senthil Selvaraj; Eva E Martinez; Abigail S Baldridge; Jin Sha; Marguerite R Irvin; Ulrich Broeckel; Donna K Arnett; Laura J Rasmussen-Torvik; Sanjiv J Shah
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 4.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.