| Literature DB >> 22654648 |
Somya A Nassar1, Amira H Mohamed, Hamdy Soufy, Soad M Nasr, K M Mahran.
Abstract
The present experiment was conducted to study the effect of ethanolic extract of Egyptian propolis given alone or in combination with inactivated Pasteurella multocida vaccine on rabbits challenged with a virulent strain of Pasteurella multocida. Fifty-six New-Zealand rabbits, 6-8 weeks old and non-vaccinated against pasteurellosis, were randomly divided into eight equal groups. The first group was kept as a control for the experiment. The other groups received different treatments with propolis extract, inactivated vaccine, or both. The experiment continued for seven weeks during which clinical signs, body weight, and mortality rate were monitored, and blood samples were collected weekly for evaluating the leukogram, serum biochemistry, and immune response in all groups of animals. At the end of the seventh week, the animals were subjected to challenge with a virulent strain of Pasteurella multocida. Two weeks later, tissue specimens were collected from different organs for histopathological examination. Results showed that rabbits of the groups treated with both propolis and the vaccine by different routes appeared healthy after challenge. It has been concluded that alcoholic extract of propolis administrated in combination with inactivated Pasteurella multocida vaccine has no adverse effects on the general health conditions and enhances immune response in rabbits.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22654648 PMCID: PMC3354672 DOI: 10.1100/2012/901516
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Total leukocytes count (×103/μL) in different experimental groups of rabbits received propolis and vaccine treatments for six weeks (mean ± SE).
| Groups Period (week) | Control | Propolis orally | Propolis orally then vaccine S/C | Vaccine S/C then propolis orally | Propolis orally + vaccine S/C | Vaccine S/C only | Propolis + vaccine S/C | Propolis S/C |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.85bd
| 7.98d
| 8.93bd
| 9.60bc
| 8.24cd
| 9.68b
| 12.50a
| 9.82b
|
| 2 | 8.42bc
| 9.10bc
| 7.82c
| 8.31bc
|
9.80ab
| 11.06a
| 8.22bc
| 8.14bc
|
| 3 | 8.89b
| 11.60a
| 12.43a
| 12.95a
| 11.50a
| 8.96b
| 12.78a
| 9.28b
|
| 4 | 10.32c
| 11.12bc
| 13.66a
| 13.18ab
| 10.35c
| 12.28a-c
| 13.37a
| 12.44a-c
|
| 5 | 8.57e
| 12.56b
| 14.18a
| 12.12bc
| 10.44d
| 11.18cd
| 12.78b
| 11.36cd
|
| 6 | 9.90c
| 12.36b
| 16.54a
| 12.84b
| 12.40b
| 8.65c
| 12.86b
| 10.34c
|
Means followed by different superscripts (a, b, c, d, e) within the same row are significantly different at P < 0.05.
SE: standard error.
Figure 1Heterophil (a), lymphocyte (b) counts, and serum globulins (c) in different experimental groups of rabbits received propolis and vaccine treatments for six weeks.
Serum total proteins (g/dL) in different experimental groups of rabbits received propolis and vaccine treatments for six weeks (mean ± SE).
| Groups Period (week) | Control | Propolis orally | Propolis orally then vaccine S/C | Vaccine S/C then propolis orally | Propolis orally + vaccine S/C | Vaccine S/C only | Propolis + vaccine S/C | Propolis S/C |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7.23b-c
| 6.95bc
| 6.23c
| 6.91bc
| 7.02bc
| 7.52b
| 8.51a
| 8.77a
|
| 2 | 6.32c
| 7.04bc
| 7.43bc
| 7.40bc
| 7.35bc
| 6.97c
| 9.45a
| 7.98b
|
| 3 | 5.34d
| 5.19cd
| 7.32a-c
| 7.16bc
| 6.57cd
| 8.11a
| 8.88a
| 7.79ab
|
| 4 | 4.99d
| 7.11bc
| 6.15c
| 6.72c
| 7.66b
| 6.32c
| 9.20a
| 8.19b
|
| 5 | 4.95d
| 7.96bc
| 7.13bc
| 7.02bc
| 8.93a
| 8.64ab
| 9.35a
| 8.40b
|
| 6 | 5.15c
| 8.21a
| 5.23c
| 6.27bc
| 6.21bc
| 8.59a
| 8.52a
| 7.49b
|
Means followed by different superscripts (a, b, c, d, e) within the same row are significantly different at P < 0.05.
SE: standard error.
Figure 2Serum glucose (a), total cholesterol (b), and triglycerides (c) in different experimental groups of rabbits received propolis and vaccine treatments for six weeks.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA) in different experimental groups of rabbits received propolis and vaccine treatments from the second till the seven week (mean ± SE).
| Groups Period (week) | Control | Propolis orally | Propolis orally then vaccine S/C | Vaccine S/C then propolis orally | Propolis orally + vaccine S/C | Vaccine S/C only | Propolis + vaccine S/C | Propolis S/C |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 0.136 | 0.124 | 0.504 | 0.502 | 0.518 | 0.531 | 0.522 | 0.144 |
| 3 | 0.131 | 0.118 | 0.412 | 0.532 | 0.464 | 0.493 | 0.441 | 0.126 |
| 4 | 0.149 | 0.201 | 0.350 | 0.371 | 0.494 | 0.285 | 0.421 | 0.152 |
| 5 | 0.154 | 0.144 | 0.344 | 0.516 | 0.483 | 0.353 | 0.455 | 0.154 |
| 6 | 0.151 | 0.127 | 0.361 | 0.409 | 0.561 | 0.402 | 0.533 | 0.149 |
| 7 | 0.135 | 0.150 | 0.403 | 0.463 | 0.408 | 0.471 | 0.414 | 0.138 |
|
| ||||||||
|
| 0.290 | |||||||
Lymphocyte proliferation assay (BrdU) in different experimental groups of rabbits received propolis and vaccine treatments for six weeks (mean ± SE).
| Groups Period (week) | Control | Vaccine S/C only | Propolis + vaccine S/C | Propolis S/C |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.09b
| 0.19a
| 0.14ab
| 0.10b
|
| 2 | 0.10b
| 0.21a
| 0.23a
| 0.10b
|
| 4 | 0.06c
| 0.26a
| 0.26a
| 0.14b
|
Means followed by different superscripts (a, b, c, d, e) within the same row are significantly different at P < 0.05.
SE: standard error.