| Literature DB >> 22654642 |
E D Wannaz1, J H Rodriguez, T Wolfsberger, H A Carreras, M L Pignata, A Fangmeier, J Franzaring.
Abstract
A pollution gradient was observed in tree foliage sampled in the vicinity of a large aluminium production facility in Patagonia (Argentina). Leaves of Eucalyptus rostrata, and Populus hybridus and different needle ages of Pinus spec. were collected and concentrations of aluminium (Al) and sulphur (S) as well as physiological parameters (chlorophyll and lipid oxidation products) were analyzed. Al and S concentrations indicate a steep pollution gradient in the study showing a relationship with the physiological parameters in particular membrane lipid oxidation products. The present study confirms that aluminium smelting results in high Al and sulphur deposition in the study area, and therefore further studies should be carried out taking into account potentially adverse effects of these compounds on human and ecosystem health.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22654642 PMCID: PMC3354667 DOI: 10.1100/2012/865927
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Mean, standard deviation, minimum, and maximum values of aluminium, sulphur, chlorophyll a+b concentration, Chl-b/Chl-a, Ph-a/Chl-a, HPCD, and MDA measured in foliage of different tree species in Puerto Madryn, Argentina.
| Species | Descriptive statistics | Aluminium ( | Sulphur (mg g−1 DW) | Chl-a+b (mg g−1 DW) | Chl-b/Chl-a | Phe-a/Chl-a | HPCD ( | MDA (nmol g−1 DW) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Mean | 220.2 | 3.706 | 2.19 | 0.33 | 1.44 | 51.8 | 290 |
| SD | 84.48 | 2.717 | 0.88 | 0.09 | 0.17 | 28.4 | 95.2 | |
| Min | 89.49 | 1.290 | 0.89 | 0.13 | 1.04 | 20.5 | 141 | |
| Max | 467.0 | 9.343 | 4.65 | 0.48 | 1.76 | 124 | 468 | |
|
| ||||||||
|
| Mean | 772.6 | 1.508 | 2.07 | 0.42 | 1.35 | 109 | 224 |
| SD | 239.6 | 0.380 | 0.76 | 0.27 | 0.21 | 33.2 | 89.1 | |
| Min | 181.3 | 1.153 | 0.73 | 0.04 | 1.05 | 55.9 | 120 | |
| Max | 1354.3 | 2.788 | 4.34 | 1.52 | 1.95 | 186 | 446 | |
|
| ||||||||
|
| Mean | 1025 | 1.887 | 1.43 | 0.46 | 2.09 | 147 | 256 |
| SD | 208.1 | 0.514 | 0.50 | 0.13 | 0.59 | 52.3 | 97.7 | |
| Min | 704.4 | 1.241 | 0.76 | 0.31 | 1.41 | 57.9 | 163 | |
| Max | 1378 | 3.046 | 2.88 | 0.75 | 3.29 | 244 | 547 | |
|
| ||||||||
|
| Mean | 638.3 | 1.555 | 1.31 | 0.44 | 1.47 | 141 | 279 |
| SD | 271.9 | 0.356 | 0.65 | 0.13 | 0.24 | 52.1 | 60.8 | |
| Min | 284.2 | 0.985 | 0.53 | 0.23 | 0.82 | 27.6 | 174 | |
| Max | 1442 | 2.450 | 2.90 | 0.70 | 2.03 | 285 | 449 | |
Figure 1Aluminium concentration (μg g−1 DW) in the study area determined in leaves of E. rostrata (a) and P. hybridus (b) and needles of Pinus spec. 2008/2009 (c) and 2009/2010 (d).
Figure 2Aluminium pollution gradient in the study area expressed as Al concentration in Pinus spec. one-year-old needles (dashed lines) and E. rostrata (full lines) in relation to the distance from the emission source.
Figure 3Sulphur concentration (mg g−1) in the study area determined in leaves of E. rostrata (a) and P. hybridus (b) and needles of Pinus spec. 2008/2009 (c) and 2009/2010 (d).