Literature DB >> 22653923

Allosteric conversation in the androgen receptor ligand-binding domain surfaces.

Solène Grosdidier1, Laia R Carbó, Víctor Buzón, Greg Brooke, Phuong Nguyen, John D Baxter, Charlotte Bevan, Paul Webb, Eva Estébanez-Perpiñá, Juan Fernández-Recio.   

Abstract

Androgen receptor (AR) is a major therapeutic target that plays pivotal roles in prostate cancer (PCa) and androgen insensitivity syndromes. We previously proposed that compounds recruited to ligand-binding domain (LBD) surfaces could regulate AR activity in hormone-refractory PCa and discovered several surface modulators of AR function. Surprisingly, the most effective compounds bound preferentially to a surface of unknown function [binding function 3 (BF-3)] instead of the coactivator-binding site [activation function 2 (AF-2)]. Different BF-3 mutations have been identified in PCa or androgen insensitivity syndrome patients, and they can strongly affect AR activity. Further, comparison of AR x-ray structures with and without bound ligands at BF-3 and AF-2 showed structural coupling between both pockets. Here, we combine experimental evidence and molecular dynamic simulations to investigate whether BF-3 mutations affect AR LBD function and dynamics possibly via allosteric conversation between surface sites. Our data indicate that AF-2 conformation is indeed closely coupled to BF-3 and provide mechanistic proof of their structural interconnection. BF-3 mutations may function as allosteric elicitors, probably shifting the AR LBD conformational ensemble toward conformations that alter AF-2 propensity to reorganize into subpockets that accommodate N-terminal domain and coactivator peptides. The induced conformation may result in either increased or decreased AR activity. Activating BF-3 mutations also favor the formation of another pocket (BF-4) in the vicinity of AF-2 and BF-3, which we also previously identified as a hot spot for a small compound. We discuss the possibility that BF-3 may be a protein-docking site that binds to the N-terminal domain and corepressors. AR surface sites are attractive pharmacological targets to develop allosteric modulators that might be alternative lead compounds for drug design.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22653923      PMCID: PMC5416996          DOI: 10.1210/me.2011-1281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Endocrinol        ISSN: 0888-8809


  70 in total

1.  Structural evidence for ligand specificity in the binding domain of the human androgen receptor. Implications for pathogenic gene mutations.

Authors:  P M Matias; P Donner; R Coelho; M Thomaz; C Peixoto; S Macedo; N Otto; S Joschko; P Scholz; A Wegg; S Bäsler; M Schäfer; U Egner; M A Carrondo
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-08-25       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Functional analysis of 44 mutant androgen receptors from human prostate cancer.

Authors:  Xu-Bao Shi; Ai-Hong Ma; Liang Xia; Hsing-Jien Kung; Ralph W de Vere White
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Characterization of the two coactivator-interacting surfaces of the androgen receptor and their relative role in transcriptional control.

Authors:  Valerie Christiaens; Charlotte L Bevan; Leen Callewaert; Anna Haelens; Guy Verrijdt; Wilfried Rombauts; Frank Claessens
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-10-04       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  An interpretation of positional displacement of the helix12 in nuclear receptors: preexistent swing-up motion triggered by ligand binding.

Authors:  Chiduru Watanabe; Hirofumi Watanabe; Shigenori Tanaka
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2010-06-16

5.  Androgen receptor mutations causing human androgen insensitivity syndromes show a key role of residue M807 in Helix 8-Helix 10 interactions and in receptor ligand-binding domain stability.

Authors:  Y C Ong; P R Kolatkar; E L Yong
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.025

6.  A 629RKLKK633 motif in the hinge region controls the androgen receptor at multiple levels.

Authors:  Tamzin M Tanner; Sarah Denayer; Bart Geverts; Nora Van Tilborgh; Stefanie Kerkhofs; Christine Helsen; Lien Spans; Vanessa Dubois; Adriaan B Houtsmuller; Frank Claessens; Annemie Haelens
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 9.261

7.  A signature motif in transcriptional co-activators mediates binding to nuclear receptors.

Authors:  D M Heery; E Kalkhoven; S Hoare; M G Parker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-06-12       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Androgen receptor abnormalities in castration-recurrent prostate cancer.

Authors:  Lucas P Nacusi; Donald J Tindall
Journal:  Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2009-09-01

Review 9.  Molecular basis of androgen insensitivity.

Authors:  A O Brinkmann
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2001-06-20       Impact factor: 4.102

10.  FXXLF and WXXLF sequences mediate the NH2-terminal interaction with the ligand binding domain of the androgen receptor.

Authors:  B He; J A Kemppainen; E M Wilson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-07-28       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Androgen receptor gene rearrangements: new perspectives on prostate cancer progression.

Authors:  Lucas J Brand; Scott M Dehm
Journal:  Curr Drug Targets       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.465

2.  Targeting Binding Function-3 of the Androgen Receptor Blocks Its Co-Chaperone Interactions, Nuclear Translocation, and Activation.

Authors:  Nada Lallous; Eric Leblanc; Ravi S N Munuganti; Mohamed D H Hassona; Nader Al Nakouzi; Shannon Awrey; Helene Morin; Mani Roshan-Moniri; Kriti Singh; Sam Lawn; Takeshi Yamazaki; Hans H Adomat; Christophe Andre; Mads Daugaard; Robert N Young; Emma S Tomlinson Guns; Paul S Rennie; Artem Cherkasov
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 6.261

3.  Structural Dynamics of Agonist and Antagonist Binding to the Androgen Receptor.

Authors:  Ettayapuram Ramaprasad Azhagiya Singam; Phum Tachachartvanich; Michele A La Merrill; Martyn T Smith; Kathleen A Durkin
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  Coregulator control of androgen receptor action by a novel nuclear receptor-binding motif.

Authors:  Katja Jehle; Laura Cato; Antje Neeb; Claudia Muhle-Goll; Nicole Jung; Emmanuel W Smith; Victor Buzon; Laia R Carbó; Eva Estébanez-Perpiñá; Katja Schmitz; Ljiljana Fruk; Burkhard Luy; Yu Chen; Marc B Cox; Stefan Bräse; Myles Brown; Andrew C B Cato
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  Evolving landscape and novel treatments in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Paul J Toren; Martin E Gleave
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 3.285

6.  Molecular Dynamics Simulations Revealed the Regulation of Ligands to the Interactions between Androgen Receptor and Its Coactivator.

Authors:  Na Liu; Wenfang Zhou; Yue Guo; Junmei Wang; Weitao Fu; Huiyong Sun; Dan Li; Mojie Duan; Tingjun Hou
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 7.  Androgen receptor: structure, role in prostate cancer and drug discovery.

Authors:  M H Eileen Tan; Jun Li; H Eric Xu; Karsten Melcher; Eu-leong Yong
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 8.  Androgen Receptor Dependence.

Authors:  Aashi P Chaturvedi; Scott M Dehm
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 2.622

9.  Similarities and Distinctions in Actions of Surface-Directed and Classic Androgen Receptor Antagonists.

Authors:  Ji Ho Suh; Arundhati Chattopadhyay; Douglas H Sieglaff; Cheryl Storer Samaniego; Marc B Cox; Paul Webb
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Targeting alternative sites on the androgen receptor to treat castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nada Lallous; Kush Dalal; Artem Cherkasov; Paul S Rennie
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.