PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the bowel habit and laxative use in advanced cancer patients with constipation in palliative care unit. METHODS: It was a cross-sectional study using a self-designed questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 225 patients were analysed. Among all patients, 92.0 % (207 patients) had any intervention for relief of constipation, including laxatives, suppositories, enemas, digital evacuation and Chinese herbal medicine, and 65.3 % (147 patients) were on laxatives prescribed by our doctors. The severity of constipation as assessed by the constipation visual analogue scale (CVAS) (0-7, 7 = most severe) was reported as no constipation (0-1) in 19.6 % of patients, constipation (2-4) in 50.7 % and severe constipation (5-7) in 29.8 %. More patients with severe constipation, as compared with patients with constipation and no constipation, reported inadequate pushing force (83.6 vs. 47.4 vs. 6.8 %), sense of incomplete defecation (40.3 vs. 14.9 vs. 6.8 %) and difficult defecation (58.2 vs. 26.3 vs. 0 %), all p < 0.001, but there was no difference in stool types as assessed by Bristol Stool Scale (p = 0.303). Patients not on opioids, as compared with patients on strong opioids, had similar CVAS scores and description of constipation but had least laxatives prescribed (60.2 vs. 78.9 %, p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Evaluation of constipation should not rely on stool form or consistency alone, and patient's description of constipation is worth consideration. Constipation is also a problem in patients not on opioids and more attention is required. A revisit to existing guidelines is needed.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the bowel habit and laxative use in advanced cancerpatients with constipation in palliative care unit. METHODS: It was a cross-sectional study using a self-designed questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 225 patients were analysed. Among all patients, 92.0 % (207 patients) had any intervention for relief of constipation, including laxatives, suppositories, enemas, digital evacuation and Chinese herbal medicine, and 65.3 % (147 patients) were on laxatives prescribed by our doctors. The severity of constipation as assessed by the constipation visual analogue scale (CVAS) (0-7, 7 = most severe) was reported as no constipation (0-1) in 19.6 % of patients, constipation (2-4) in 50.7 % and severe constipation (5-7) in 29.8 %. More patients with severe constipation, as compared with patients with constipation and no constipation, reported inadequate pushing force (83.6 vs. 47.4 vs. 6.8 %), sense of incomplete defecation (40.3 vs. 14.9 vs. 6.8 %) and difficult defecation (58.2 vs. 26.3 vs. 0 %), all p < 0.001, but there was no difference in stool types as assessed by Bristol Stool Scale (p = 0.303). Patients not on opioids, as compared with patients on strong opioids, had similar CVAS scores and description of constipation but had least laxatives prescribed (60.2 vs. 78.9 %, p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Evaluation of constipation should not rely on stool form or consistency alone, and patient's description of constipation is worth consideration. Constipation is also a problem in patients not on opioids and more attention is required. A revisit to existing guidelines is needed.
Authors: Richard J Saad; Satish S C Rao; Kenneth L Koch; Braden Kuo; Henry P Parkman; Richard W McCallum; Michael D Sitrin; Gregory E Wilding; Jack R Semler; William D Chey Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2009-11-03 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: P J Larkin; N P Sykes; C Centeno; J E Ellershaw; F Elsner; B Eugene; J R G Gootjes; M Nabal; A Noguera; C Ripamonti; F Zucco; W W A Zuurmond Journal: Palliat Med Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 4.762
Authors: Chung-Wah Cheng; Annie O L Kwok; Zhao-Xiang Bian; Doris M W Tse Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Date: 2012-06-24 Impact factor: 2.629
Authors: Chung-Wah Cheng; Hoi-Fung Mok; Cora W S Yau; Jasmine T M Chan; Yu-Chen Kang; Pui-Yan Lam; Linda L D Zhong; Chen Zhao; Bacon F L Ng; Annie O L Kwok; Doris M W Tse; Zhao-Xiang Bian Journal: Chin Med Date: 2022-03-02 Impact factor: 5.455