Literature DB >> 22652232

A common language in neoadjuvant breast cancer clinical trials: proposals for standard definitions and endpoints.

Debora Fumagalli1, Philippe L Bedard, Zeina Nahleh, Stefan Michiels, Christos Sotiriou, Sherene Loi, Joseph A Sparano, Matthew Ellis, Nola Hylton, Jo Anne Zujewski, Clifford Hudis, Laura Esserman, Martine Piccart.   

Abstract

The neoadjuvant setting provides a unique opportunity to study the effect of systemic treatments on breast cancer biology and to identify clinically useful prognostic and predictive biomarkers. Discrepancies and inconsistencies in the use of definitions and endpoint assessments in this setting confound the analysis and interpretation of results across clinical trials and hinder research progress. This Review represents a joint effort of the Breast International Group and the National Cancer Institute-sponsored North American Breast Cancer Group to provide clinicians and researchers with a series of standardised definitions and endpoints that could be implemented in future neoadjuvant clinical trials. Definitions of the setting of interest and of survival endpoints are recommended, together with proposals for standard assessment of the response to treatment, use of functional and molecular imaging endpoints, and characterisation and selection of the population to treat. We expect that implementation of these recommendations will improve the conduct, reporting, and effectiveness of clinical trials and fully exploit the clinical and scientific potential of the neoadjuvant setting in breast cancer.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22652232     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70378-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  23 in total

1.  Pathological assessment of resection specimens after neoadjuvant therapy for metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  M T Tetzlaff; J L Messina; J E Stein; X Xu; R N Amaria; C U Blank; B A van de Wiel; P M Ferguson; R V Rawson; M I Ross; A J Spillane; J E Gershenwald; R P M Saw; A C J van Akkooi; W J van Houdt; T C Mitchell; A M Menzies; G V Long; J A Wargo; M A Davies; V G Prieto; J M Taube; R A Scolyer
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  One-Year Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Orsolya Rusz; András Vörös; Zoltán Varga; Gyöngyi Kelemen; Gabriella Uhercsák; Alíz Nikolényi; Katalin Ormándi; Zsolt Simonka; Zsuzsanna Kahán
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 3.201

3.  Progesterone Receptors, Pathological Complete Response and Early Outcome for Locally Advanced Breast Cancer - a Single Centre Study. (PPLB - 01).

Authors:  Sanjit Agrawal; Lalit Banswal; Animesh Saha; Indu Arun; Soumitra Shankar Datta; Sanjoy Chatterjee; Rosina Ahmed
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-04-23

Review 4.  Current approaches for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Roisin M Connolly; Vered Stearns
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 4.432

5.  Hepatic resection for breast cancer liver metastases: Impact of intrinsic subtypes.

Authors:  Yun Shin Chun; Takashi Mizuno; Jordan M Cloyd; Min Jin Ha; Kiyohiko Omichi; Ching-Wei D Tzeng; Thomas A Aloia; Naoto T Ueno; Henry M Kuerer; Carlos H Barcenas; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-03-28       Impact factor: 4.424

6.  Maastricht Delphi consensus on event definitions for classification of recurrence in breast cancer research.

Authors:  Martine Moossdorff; Lori M van Roozendaal; Luc J A Strobbe; Stefan Aebi; David A Cameron; J Michael Dixon; Armando E Giuliano; Bruce G Haffty; Brigid E Hickey; Clifford A Hudis; V Suzanne Klimberg; Bogda Koczwara; Thorsten Kühn; Marc E Lippman; Anthony Lucci; Martine Piccart; Benjamin D Smith; Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Kimberly J Van Zee; Jan B Vermorken; Giuseppe Viale; Adri C Voogd; Irene L Wapnir; Julia R White; Marjolein L Smidt
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  A Phase II Randomized Study of Neoadjuvant Letrozole Plus Alpelisib for Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Breast Cancer (NEO-ORB).

Authors:  Ingrid A Mayer; Aleix Prat; Daniel Egle; Sibel Blau; J Alejandro Pérez Fidalgo; Michael Gnant; Peter A Fasching; Marco Colleoni; Antonio C Wolff; Eric P Winer; Christian F Singer; Sara Hurvitz; Laura García Estévez; Peter A van Dam; Sherko Kümmel; Christoph Mundhenke; Frankie Holmes; Naveen Babbar; Laure Charbonnier; Ivan Diaz-Padilla; Florian D Vogl; Dalila Sellami; Carlos L Arteaga
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Neoadjuvant therapy with doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide followed by weekly paclitaxel in early breast cancer: a retrospective analysis of 200 consecutive patients treated in a single center with a median follow-up of 9.5 years.

Authors:  Lisi M Dredze; Michael Friger; Samuel Ariad; Michael Koretz; Bertha Delgado; Ruthy Shaco-Levy; Margarita Tokar; Michael Bayme; Ravit Agassi; Maia Rosenthal; Victor Dyomin; Olga Belochitski; Shai Libson; Tamar Mizrahi; David B Geffen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Breast cancer subtyping by immunohistochemistry and histological grade outperforms breast cancer intrinsic subtypes in predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy response.

Authors:  E H Lips; L Mulder; J J de Ronde; I A M Mandjes; B B Koolen; L F A Wessels; S Rodenhuis; J Wesseling
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Which breast cancer decisions remain non-compliant with guidelines despite the use of computerised decision support?

Authors:  B Séroussi; C Laouénan; J Gligorov; S Uzan; F Mentré; J Bouaud
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.