Literature DB >> 22651950

Assessing the quality of pain care in ambulatory patients with advanced stage cancer.

Saul N Weingart1, Angela Cleary, Sherri O Stuver, Maureen Lynch, Douglas Brandoff, Kristen G Schaefer, Junya Zhu, Donna L Berry, Susan Block, Jane C Weeks.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Pain is common among patients with advanced cancer despite the dissemination of clinical pain care guidelines.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the quality of pain care among patients with advanced disease.
METHODS: We reviewed the records of 85 adult ambulatory patients with advanced breast, lung, and gastrointestinal cancer treated in 2004-2006. Patients' screening pain intensity scores were at least 7 of 10. Nurse reviewers completed medical record reviews of care rendered at the index visit and over the subsequent 30 days based on the 2004 National Comprehensive Cancer Network pain guideline. An expert panel then rated the quality of the evaluation, treatment, and overall pain care. We used a multivariable model to analyze guideline compliance and resolution of severe pain.
RESULTS: Among advanced cancer patients with severe pain, clinicians adjusted pain medications only half the time and made few timely referrals for pain-related consultations. By 30 days after the index visit, 34% of patients continued to report severe pain. The expert panel judged the overall quality of pain care as "fair" or "poor" in about two-thirds of cases because more timely and effective intervention could have reduced the severity and duration of pain. Resolution of severe pain was associated with adjustment of pain medications at the index visit (adjusted odds ratio 3.8, 95% CI 1.3-10.6).
CONCLUSION: There is room for improvement in the pain care of patients with advanced cancer. Additional research is needed to understand the reasons for poor performance.
Copyright © 2012 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22651950     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.06.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  4 in total

Review 1.  Psychosocial interventions for managing pain in older adults: outcomes and clinical implications.

Authors:  F J Keefe; L Porter; T Somers; R Shelby; A V Wren
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  Screening for Pain in the Ambulatory Cancer Setting: Is 0-10 Enough?

Authors:  Virginia T LeBaron; Traci M Blonquist; Fangxin Hong; Barbara Halpenny; Donna L Berry
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  The impact of pain control on physical and psychiatric functions of cancer patients: a nation-wide survey in Taiwan.

Authors:  Kun-Ming Rau; Jen-Shi Chen; Hung-Bo Wu; Sheng-Fung Lin; Ming-Kuen Lai; Jyh-Ming Chow; Ming-Lih Huang; Cyuan-Jheng Wang; Cheng-Jeng Tai; Wen-Li Hwang; Yin-Che Lu; Chung-Huang Chan; Ruey Kuen Hsieh
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Patient satisfaction with pain relief following major abdominal surgery is influenced by good communication, pain relief and empathic caring: a qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Womba Musumadi Mubita; Cliff Richardson; Michelle Briggs
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2019-06-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.