Literature DB >> 22651702

Electrocardiographic criteria of true left bundle branch block: a simple sign to predict a better clinical and instrumental response to CRT.

Giosuè Mascioli1, Luigi Padeletti, Biagio Sassone, Massimo Zecchin, Elena Lucca, Stefania Sacchi, Giulio Boggian, Anna Ludovica Tondo, Chiara Belvito, Nikoloz Bakhtadze, Alessio Borrelli, Gianfranco Sinagra.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has proved to be very effective in improving morbidity and mortality in patients affected with severe congestive heart failure. Its efficacy has been shown to be greater in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB). The aim of our study was to verify if newly proposed criteria for true LBBB identify patients with a better clinical and instrumental response to CRT.
METHODS: Between May 2007 and April 2011, 111 patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35% and LBBB morphology received a CRT device and were divided into two groups according to QRS morphology. Group 1 (61 patients) consisted of patients with "true" LBBB morphology; group 2 (50 patients) consisted of patients with "false" LBBB. The primary endpoint was the utility of criteria for true LBBB to predict a composite endpoint of all-cause mortality and hospital admission with heart failure. The secondary endpoint was the utility of the same criteria to predict an absolute increase in LVEF ≥ 10%.
RESULTS: "False" LBBB morphology and a dose of bisoprolol <5 mg at last follow-up were the only parameters related to clinical outcome in multivariate analysis (respectively: hazard ratio [HR] 3.98, confidence interval [CI] 95% 1.51-10.48; HR 0.15, CI 95% 0.05-0.43). "True" LBBB morphology was the only variable significantly related to a greater increase in LVEF (HR 4.57, CI 95% 1.36-8.28).
CONCLUSION: True LBBB morphology is related to a higher event-free survival rate in CRT patients and better echocardiographic response. ©2012, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22651702     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2012.03427.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  23 in total

Review 1.  Re-evaluating the electro-vectorcardiographic criteria for left bundle branch block.

Authors:  Andrés Ricardo Pérez-Riera; Raimundo Barbosa-Barros; Rodrigo Daminello-Raimundo; Luiz Carlos de Abreu; Marcos Célio de Almeida; Jani Rankinen; Fabio Baeub Soler; Kjell Nikus
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  Comparison of four LBBB definitions for predicting mortality in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Marek Jastrzębski; Piotr Kukla; Roksana Kisiel; Kamil Fijorek; Paweł Moskal; Danuta Czarnecka
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Validation of an automatic diagnosis of strict left bundle branch block criteria using 12-lead electrocardiograms.

Authors:  Xiaojuan Xia; Anne-Christine Ruwald; Martin H Ruwald; Nene Ugoeke; Barbara Szepietowska; Valentina Kutyifa; Mehmet K Aktas; Poul Erik B Thomsen; Wojciech Zareba; Arthur J Moss; Jean-Philippe Couderc
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 1.468

4.  Localization of myocardial scar in patients with cardiomyopathy and left bundle branch block using electrocardiographic Selvester QRS scoring.

Authors:  Björn Wieslander; Katherine C Wu; Zak Loring; Linus G Andersson; Terry F Frank; Gary Gerstenblith; Gordon F Tomaselli; Robert G Weiss; Galen S Wagner; Martin Ugander; David G Strauss
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 1.438

5.  Regression of fragmented QRS complex: a marker of electrical reverse remodeling in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Xin-wei Yang; Wei Hua; Jing Wang; Zhi-min Liu; Li-gang Ding; Ke-ping Chen; Shu Zhang
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 6.  Left bundle branch block and the evolving role of QRS morphology in selection of patients for cardiac resynchronization.

Authors:  Kelley P Anderson
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony by cardiac magnetic resonance is greater in patients with strict vs nonstrict electrocardiogram criteria for left bundle-branch block.

Authors:  Linus G Andersson; Katherine C Wu; Björn Wieslander; Zak Loring; Terry F Frank; Charles Maynard; Gary Gerstenblith; Gordon F Tomaselli; Robert G Weiss; Galen S Wagner; Martin Ugander; David G Strauss
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 4.749

8.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy response in heart failure patients with different subtypes of true left bundle branch block.

Authors:  Javier García-Seara; Diego Iglesias Alvarez; Belen Alvarez Alvarez; Francisco Gude Sampedro; Jose L Martínez Sande; Moisés Rodríguez-Mañero; Bahij Kreidieh; Xesus Alberte Fernández-López; Laila González Melchor; José Ramón González Juanatey
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 1.900

9.  Comparison of the relation between left ventricular anatomy and QRS duration in patients with cardiomyopathy with versus without left bundle branch block.

Authors:  Dulciana D Chan; Katherine C Wu; Zak Loring; Loriano Galeotti; Gary Gerstenblith; Gordon Tomaselli; Robert G Weiss; Galen S Wagner; David G Strauss
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 10.  Strategies to improve cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Kevin Vernooy; Caroline J M van Deursen; Marc Strik; Frits W Prinzen
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 32.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.