AIM: The purpose of the present study was to analyze the association between isokinetic strength and field-based muscular fitness tests in youth. METHODS: One hundred twenty-six adolescents (14.4±1.7 y) participated in the study. Upper and lower body isokinetic strength were measured at preset angular velocities of 90 º/s and 60 º/s, respectively. Muscular fitness was also assessed by means of field-based tests: handgrip strength, bent and extended arm hang tests, standing long jump, squat jump, countermovement jump and Abalakov jump. Height, weight and skinfold thickness were used to estimate body composition. RESULTS: All field-based tests were significantly associated with isokinetic peak torque and power (P<0.001 in all cases). Handgrip strength and standing long jump showed the highest associations with the isokinetic parameters (0.61≤r≤0.87; 0.39≤R2≤0.76). Weight-bearing field tests increased on average 20 % their association (R2) with isokinetic parameters when standardized by individual's body weight (test score × weight), while the average increase was 16 % when standardized by fat-free mass (test score × fat-free mass). CONCLUSION: Handgrip strength and standing long jump tests seem to be the most valid field-based muscular fitness tests when compared to isokinetic strength. These tests can be useful to assess muscular fitness in young people when laboratory methods are not feasible.
AIM: The purpose of the present study was to analyze the association between isokinetic strength and field-based muscular fitness tests in youth. METHODS: One hundred twenty-six adolescents (14.4±1.7 y) participated in the study. Upper and lower body isokinetic strength were measured at preset angular velocities of 90 º/s and 60 º/s, respectively. Muscular fitness was also assessed by means of field-based tests: handgrip strength, bent and extended arm hang tests, standing long jump, squat jump, countermovement jump and Abalakov jump. Height, weight and skinfold thickness were used to estimate body composition. RESULTS: All field-based tests were significantly associated with isokinetic peak torque and power (P<0.001 in all cases). Handgrip strength and standing long jump showed the highest associations with the isokinetic parameters (0.61≤r≤0.87; 0.39≤R2≤0.76). Weight-bearing field tests increased on average 20 % their association (R2) with isokinetic parameters when standardized by individual's body weight (test score × weight), while the average increase was 16 % when standardized by fat-free mass (test score × fat-free mass). CONCLUSION: Handgrip strength and standing long jump tests seem to be the most valid field-based muscular fitness tests when compared to isokinetic strength. These tests can be useful to assess muscular fitness in young people when laboratory methods are not feasible.
Authors: Francisco B Ortega; Cristina Cadenas-Sánchez; Guillermo Sánchez-Delgado; José Mora-González; Borja Martínez-Téllez; Enrique G Artero; Jose Castro-Piñero; Idoia Labayen; Palma Chillón; Marie Löf; Jonatan R Ruiz Journal: Sports Med Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Viktor H Ahlqvist; Margareta Persson; Francisco B Ortega; Per Tynelius; Cecilia Magnusson; Daniel Berglind Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-07-04 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Kelly Samara Silva; Jaqueline Aragoni da Silva; Valter Cordeiro Barbosa Filho; Priscila Cristina Dos Santos; Pablo Magno da Silveira; Marcus V V Lopes; Jo Salmon Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2020-07-31 Impact factor: 1.817