Literature DB >> 22648447

Implementation of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: establishment of a learning curve and short-term outcomes.

Susana Mustafa1, Amnon Amit, Shlomo Filmar, Michael Deutsch, Itamar Netzer, Joseph Itskovitz-Eldor, Lior Lowenstein.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the learning curve of senior urogynecologic surgeons performing laparoscopic sacral colpopexy (LSCP) and to assess outcomes and complications of LSCP.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 47 consecutive women who underwent LSCP for pelvic organ prolapse repair between March 2009 and December 2010 at one tertiary medical center. Preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative, and demographic data were retrieved from patients' electronic charts. Pelvic organ support was assessed objectively using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification scale (POP-Q). Anatomic failure was determined as POP-Q stage ≥ II.
RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 58 years (range 35-73 years). Seven (15 %) who opted to retain their uterus underwent sacrohysteropexies. The median POP-Q was III (II-IV). Of the 47 operations, 96 % (45) were completed by laparoscopy. The duration of surgery decreased as experience of the surgical team increased, from a mean of 196 ± 62 min for the first 15 cases to 162 ± 30 min for the subsequent 30. Four patients (9 %) presented with recurrence of prolapse; three (7 %) had de novo stress urinary incontinence; two sustained a cystotomy during adhesiolysis, and one had a port-site hernia.
CONCLUSIONS: LSCP is a safe and effective treatment for pelvic organ prolapse, with very few complications. Following the first 15 cases of one surgical team, operative time decreased considerably.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22648447     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-012-2391-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  11 in total

Review 1.  Robotic Sacrocolpopexy-Is It the Treatment of Choice for Advanced Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse?

Authors:  Janine L Oliver; Ja-Hong Kim
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Single site robotic-assisted apical lateral suspension (SS R-ALS) for advanced pelvic organ prolapse: first case reported.

Authors:  Andrea Giannini; Eleonora Russo; Paolo Mannella; Tommaso Simoncini
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-12-17

3.  A new affordable and easy-to-make pelvic model for training in complex urogynecological laparoscopic procedures.

Authors:  Tamara Serdinšek; Branka Žegura Andrić; Igor But
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  The challenge of implementing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Jan Deprest; Ladislav Krofta; Frank Van der Aa; Alfredo L Milani; Jan Den Boon; Filip Claerhout; Jan-Paul Roovers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Analysis of the learning process for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: identification of challenging steps.

Authors:  Filip Claerhout; Jasper Verguts; Erika Werbrouck; Joan Veldman; Paul Lewi; Jan Deprest
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Perioperative complications of robotic sacrocolpopexy for post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse.

Authors:  Mallika Anand; Joshua L Woelk; Amy L Weaver; Emanuel C Trabuco; Christopher J Klingele; John B Gebhart
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Robotic-assisted apical lateral suspension for advanced pelvic organ prolapse: surgical technique and perioperative outcomes.

Authors:  Tommaso Simoncini; Eleonora Russo; Paolo Mannella; Andrea Giannini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Introduction of laparoscopic sacral colpopexy to a fellowship training program.

Authors:  Kelly Kantartzis; Gary Sutkin; Dan Winger; Li Wang; Jonathan Shepherd
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy using barbed sutures for mesh fixation and peritoneal closure: A safe option to reduce operational times.

Authors:  Panagiotis Kallidonis; Abdulrahman Al-Aown; Marinos Vasilas; Iason Kyriazis; Vasilis Panagopoulos; Fotini Fligou; Anastasios Athanasopoulos; Bagheri Fariborz; Evangelos Liatsikos; Mehmet Özsoy
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

10.  Laparoscopic uterovaginal prolapse surgery in the elderly: feasibility and outcomes.

Authors:  Samuel W King; Helen Jefferis; Simon Jackson; Alexander G Marfin; Natalia Price
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2017-04-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.