Literature DB >> 22648147

Amplitude effects of medio-lateral mechanical and visual perturbations on gait.

Kevin Terry1, Emily H Sinitski, Jonathan B Dingwell, Jason M Wilken.   

Abstract

Falls during walking are a major contributor to accidental deaths and injuries that can result in debilitating hospitalization costs, lost productivity, and diminished quality of life. To reduce these losses, we must develop a more profound understanding of the characteristic responses to perturbations similar to those encountered in daily life. This study addresses this issue by building on our earlier studies that examined mechanical and visual perturbations in the same environment by applying the same continuous pseudo-random perturbations at multiple (3 mechanical, 5 visual) amplitudes. Walking variability during mechanical perturbations increased significantly with amplitude for all subjects and differences as measured by variabilities of step width, COM position, and COM velocity. These parameters were the only ones sensitive to the presence of visual perturbations, but none of them changed significantly with perturbation amplitude. Additionally, visual perturbation effects were far less consistent across participants, with several who were essentially unaffected by visual perturbations at any level. The homogeneity of the mechanical perturbation effects demonstrates that human responses to mechanical perturbations are similar because they are driven by kinetics that require similar corrections that must be made in order to maintain balance. Conversely, responses to visual perturbations are driven by the perceived need to make corrections and this perception is not accurate enough to produce amplitude-related corrections, even for a single participant, nor is this perception consistent across individuals. This latter finding is likely to be relevant to future visual perturbation studies and the diagnosis and rehabilitation of gait and balance disorders.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22648147      PMCID: PMC9152765          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.789


  14 in total

1.  A mathematical model of the stability control of human thorax and pelvis movements during walking.

Authors:  Q Wu; R Swain
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.763

2.  Walking variability during continuous pseudo-random oscillations of the support surface and visual field.

Authors:  Patricia M McAndrew; Jonathan B Dingwell; Jason M Wilken
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Does walking in a virtual environment induce unstable gait? An examination of vertical ground reaction forces.

Authors:  John H Hollman; Robert H Brey; Tami J Bang; Kenton R Kaufman
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-10-23       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  Dynamic stability of human walking in visually and mechanically destabilizing environments.

Authors:  Patricia M McAndrew; Jason M Wilken; Jonathan B Dingwell
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  A six degrees-of-freedom marker set for gait analysis: repeatability and comparison with a modified Helen Hayes set.

Authors:  Thomas D Collins; Salim N Ghoussayni; David J Ewins; Jenny A Kent
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 2.840

6.  Intralimb dynamics simplify reactive control strategies during locomotion.

Authors:  J J Eng; D A Winter; A E Patla
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Using a virtual reality system to study balance and walking in a virtual outdoor environment: a pilot study.

Authors:  Lars Nyberg; Lillemor Lundin-Olsson; Björn Sondell; Anders Backman; Kenneth Holmlund; Staffan Eriksson; Michael Stenvall; Erik Rosendahl; Marcus Maxhall; Gustaf Bucht
Journal:  Cyberpsychol Behav       Date:  2006-08

8.  Kinematic variability and local dynamic stability of upper body motions when walking at different speeds.

Authors:  Jonathan B Dingwell; Laura C Marin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Strategies of healthy adults walking on a laterally oscillating treadmill.

Authors:  Rachel A Brady; Brian T Peters; Jacob J Bloomberg
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 2.840

10.  Direction-dependent control of balance during walking and standing.

Authors:  Shawn M O'Connor; Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  8 in total

1.  Dynamic stability of superior vs. inferior body segments in individuals with transtibial amputation walking in destabilizing environments.

Authors:  Rainer Beurskens; Jason M Wilken; Jonathan B Dingwell
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Margins of stability in young adults with traumatic transtibial amputation walking in destabilizing environments.

Authors:  Eduardo J Beltran; Jonathan B Dingwell; Jason M Wilken
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Dynamic stability of individuals with transtibial amputation walking in destabilizing environments.

Authors:  Rainer Beurskens; Jason M Wilken; Jonathan B Dingwell
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Do kinematic metrics of walking balance adapt to perturbed optical flow?

Authors:  Jessica D Thompson; Jason R Franz
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2017-04-02       Impact factor: 2.161

5.  Patterns of whole-body muscle activations following vertical perturbations during standing and walking.

Authors:  Desiderio Cano Porras; Jesse V Jacobs; Rivka Inzelberg; Yotam Bahat; Gabriel Zeilig; Meir Plotnik
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 4.262

6.  Reliability and Minimum Detectable Change of Temporal-Spatial, Kinematic, and Dynamic Stability Measures during Perturbed Gait.

Authors:  Christopher A Rábago; Jonathan B Dingwell; Jason M Wilken
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The effects of unexpected mechanical perturbations during treadmill walking on spatiotemporal gait parameters, and the dynamic stability measures by which to quantify postural response.

Authors:  Forough Madehkhaksar; Jochen Klenk; Kim Sczuka; Katharina Gordt; Itshak Melzer; Michael Schwenk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Visual oscillation effects on dynamic balance control in people with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Lara Riem; Scott A Beardsley; Ahmed Z Obeidat; Brian D Schmit
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 5.208

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.