Literature DB >> 22647421

Value of contrast-enhanced sonographic micro flow imaging for prostate cancer detection with t-PSA level of 4-10 ng/mL.

Yi-Fen Guo1, Feng-Hua Li, Shao-Wei Xie, Jian-Guo Xia, Hua Fang, Hong-Li Li.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficiency of contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic micro flow imaging (MFI) with conventional transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) in detecting prostate cancer with serum total prostate-specific antigen (t-PSA) of 4.0-10.0 ng/mL. To evaluate the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic MFI in detecting prostate cancer with t-PSA in diagnostic gray zone.
METHODS: 47 patients with t-PSA 4.0-10.0 ng/mL underwent gray scale, power Doppler TRUS and MFI examinations before ultrasound guided biopsies. Biopsies were performed at twelve sites in the base, the mid-gland and the apex of the prostate in each patient, when there was no abnormal ultrasound finding. When an abnormality was present at MFI, the biopsy specimen from the corresponding site was directed toward the abnormal finding. With histological results of prostate biopsy as reference standards, we assessed the cancer detection of these three methods.
RESULTS: 564 specimens were collected in this study, in which 101 were prostate cancer confirmed histologically. 152 of 564 specimens were demonstrated abnormal on MFI images, in which 71 were malignant and 81 were benign confirmed histologically. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for MFI in detecting prostate caner were 70.3%, 82.5%, 80.3%, 46.7% and 92.7%, respectively. The sensitivity and NPV for MFI were significantly better than gray scale (38.6%, 86.9%) and power Doppler (32.7%, 86.0%) (P<0.001) TRUS.
CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic MFI could significantly improve the detection rate of prostate cancer with t-PSA in diagnostic gray zone (4-10 ng/mL) than conventional ultrasound.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22647421     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  2 in total

Review 1.  Prostate cancer research in China.

Authors:  Shan-Cheng Ren; Rui Chen; Ying-Hao Sun
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 2.  Ultrasonography in prostate cancer: current roles and potential applications in radiorecurrent disease.

Authors:  James S Rosoff; Sandip M Prasad; Stephen J Savage
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 4.226

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.