Literature DB >> 22646758

Comparison of two IGRT correction strategies in postoperative head-and-neck IMRT patients.

Eva M Stoiber, Michael Schwarz, Peter E Huber, Jürgen Debus, Rolf Bendl, Kristina Giske.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2012        PMID： 22646758     DOI： 10.3109/0284186X.2012.691210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN： 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  Estimation of adequate setup margins and threshold for position errors requiring immediate attention in head and neck cancer radiotherapy based on 2D image guidance.

Authors:  Mika Kapanen; Marko Laaksomaa; Tapio Tulijoki; Seppo Peltola; Tuija Wigren; Simo Hyödynmaa; Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 3.481

2.  The frequency of re-planning and its variability dependent on the modification of the re-planning criteria and IGRT correction strategy in head and neck IMRT.

Authors:  Markus Stoll; Kristina Giske; Jürgen Debus; Rolf Bendl; Eva Maria Stoiber
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.481

3.  Analyzing human decisions in IGRT of head-and-neck cancer patients to teach image registration algorithms what experts know.

Authors:  Eva Maria Stoiber; Nina Bougatf; Hendrik Teske; Christian Bierstedt; Dieter Oetzel; Jürgen Debus; Rolf Bendl; Kristina Giske
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Analysis of which local set-up errors can be covered by a 5-mm margin for cone beam CT-guided radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Renming Zhong; Ying Song; Yuying Yan; Xuetao Wang; Shuai Li; Jidan Zhou; Xiaoyu Li; Sen Bai
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.039
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.