| Literature DB >> 22646698 |
P Gergely1, B Nuesslein-Hildesheim, D Guerini, V Brinkmann, M Traebert, C Bruns, S Pan, N S Gray, K Hinterding, N G Cooke, A Groenewegen, A Vitaliti, T Sing, O Luttringer, J Yang, A Gardin, N Wang, W J Crumb, M Saltzman, M Rosenberg, E Wallström.
Abstract
BACKGROUND ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22646698 PMCID: PMC3485666 DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.02061.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Pharmacol ISSN: 0007-1188 Impact factor: 8.739
Figure 1Chemical structure of BAF312.
Functional activity of BAF312 on human S1P receptors in the GTPγ[35S] binding assay
| Receptor subtype | EC50 (nM) ± SD | % |
|---|---|---|
| S1P1 | 0.39 ± 0.07 | 91 ± 6 |
| S1P2 | >10 000 | – |
| S1P3 | >1 000 | – |
| S1P4 | 750 ± 487 | 90 ± 9 |
| S1P5 | 0.98 ± 0.43 | 112 ± 20 |
EC50 values (nM; mean ± SD) and percentage of maximum stimulation (%Emax) induced by BAF312 on human S1P1, S1P2, S1P3, S1P4 and S1P5 receptors.
Figure 2Internalization of human S1P1 receptors by S1P and BAF312. (A) Schematic representation of the internalization assay. The extent of surface expression of myc-tagged S1P1 receptors before and after incubation of the cells with compounds is determined by flow cytometry (FCM) using an anti-myc-epitope antibody. A reduction in fluorescence indicates disappearance of the receptor from the surface of the cell. (B) Representative experiment showing internalization of myc-tagged human S1P1 receptors in CHO cells mediated by 1 µM S1P or 1 µM BAF312 after a 1 h incubation, and after a 1 h incubation and a 3 h wash.
Figure 3BAF312 suppresses ongoing disease symptoms in rat EAE. (A) EAE was induced and clinical disease was evaluated, the treatment period is indicated by the arrow (days 11–34 after immunization). Vehicle treatment group (n= 12, one moribund on day 20) and three treatment groups dosed with BAF312 (0.03, n= 7, one moribund on day 15, 0.3, n= 9, and 3 mg·kg−1, n= 9) are shown. BAF312 dose-dependently reduced clinical disease scores of established disease. (B) AUC of the disease scores during the treatment period (days 12–34); statistical significance in Dunn's multiple comparison test of BAF312 dosing groups versus vehicle-treated group. **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001.
Figure 4BAF312 activates human atrial myocytes via S1P1. Effects of BAF312 and for comparison S1P on GIRK current recorded from acutely isolated human atrial myocytes. Symbols are mean ± SEM (n= 4). Values were normalized to the current increase evoked by 20 µM carbachol.
Figure 5Mean changes in ALC after multiple daily doses of BAF312 in healthy subjects. Mean peripheral ALC trajectories are shown over the run-in (day −1), treatment phase (days 1–28) and during the follow-up period (until day 49) in subjects receiving placebo, 0.3, 1, 2.5, 10 and 20 mg·day−1 BAF312. End of study (EOS) is day 42 for cohorts 0.3, 1 and 2.5 mg, and day 49 for cohorts 10 and 20 mg. The normal range of ALC is indicated by dotted lines.
Figure 6Effect of BAF312 on different leukocyte subsets after multiple daily doses of 10 mg BAF312 in healthy subjects. Fold decreases in the absolute peripheral counts are shown for different leukocyte subsets including (A) CD14+ monocytes, CD19+ B cells, CD3+, CD4+, CD8+ T cells as well as (B) naïve T cells, central memory T cells (TCM) and peripheral effector memory T cells (TPEM) of both CD4+ and CD8+ cells in individual subjects treated with 10 mg BAF312 for 28 days. Baseline values were divided by end of treatment (day 28) values. Grey bars represent median values. The effect of BAF312 estimated by the difference in fold decreases in ALC was more pronounced on CD4+ T cells than on CD8+ T cells (*P= 0.0003). The difference in fold decreases between TCM and TPEM was significant for both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (**P < 0.0004). The difference between naïve T and TCM cells was marginally significant (***P= 0.04) for CD4+ T cells and not significant (P= 0.22) for CD8+ cells.
Figure 7Mean changes in ventricular heart rate after multiple daily doses of BAF312 in healthy subjects. Mean supine heart rate during day −1, day 1 (first dosing day) and day 2 is shown in subjects receiving placebo, 0.3, 1, 2.5, 10 and 20 mg·day−1 BAF312.
Main pharmacokinetic parameters after multiple dose administration of BAF312 to healthy subjects under fasted conditions over 28 days
| Pharmacokinetic parameter | Cohort 1 | Cohort 2 | Cohort 3 | Cohort 4 | Cohort 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.3 mg·day−1 | 1 mg·day−1 | 2.5 mg·day−1 | 10 mg·day−1 | 20 mg·day−1 | |
| Day 1 | |||||
| | |||||
| | 3.00 (3.00–6.00) | 4.50 (2.00–8.00) | 3.00 (3.00–6.00) | 3.00 (2.00–6.00) | 4.00 (3.00–8.00) |
| | 2.13 [13] | 8.01 [6] | 17.4 [88] | 84.1 [11] | 162 [20] |
| AUC0–24 h (h*ng·mL−1) | 36.2 [10] | 136 [8] | 293 [85] | 1370 [11] | 2740 [14] |
| Day 28 | |||||
| | |||||
| | 3.50 (3.00–12.00) | 3.00 (2.00–8.00) | 4.00 (3.00–8.00) | 3.00 (2.00–6.00) | 3.00 (3.00–4.00) |
| | 5.31 [16] | 14.9 [10] | 38.3 [37] | 147 [24] | 359 [17] |
| AUCτ (h*ng·mL−1) | 97.9 [19] | 282 [16] | 692 [45] | 2580 [24] | 6370 [23] |
| | 4.08 [19] | 11.7 [16] | 28.8 [45] | 107 [24] | 265 [23] |
| | 2.83 [27] | 7.74 [20] | 15.2 [120] | 70.6 [29] | 166 (88.0) |
| Effective | 36.2 [19] | 25.2 [12] | 36.3 [47] | 21.9 [19] | 28.8 [23] |
| Racc | 2.71 [19] | 2.07 [12] | 2.72 [47] | 1.88 [19] | 2.28 [23] |
Abbreviations and definitions for pharmacokinetic parameters: Tmax,ss: the time to reach maximum (peak) concentration following drug administration at steady state; Cmax,ss: the maximum (peak) observed steady-state drug concentration in the plasma during multiple dosing; AUCτ: area under curve during a dosing interval (τ) at steady state; Cavg,ss: the mean observed steady-state drug concentration in the plasma during multiple dosing; Cmin,ss: minimum (trough) observed steady-state drug concentration in the plasma during multiple dosing; T1/2: elimination half-life associated with the terminal slope (λz) of a semilogarithmic concentration-time curve; Racc: accumulation ratio.
Median (min-max).
Geometric mean [%CV geo mean].
Arithmetic mean (SD).
Effective elimination half-life based on drug accumulation at steady-state (Boxenbaum and Battle, 1995).