Literature DB >> 22646273

Structured electronic template for histopathology reporting on colorectal carcinoma resections: five-year follow-up shows sustainable long-term quality improvement.

Bettina Casati1, Roger Bjugn.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: To improve quality, pathology organizations have published guidelines with key parameters for histopathology reporting on cancer resections. Checklists or structured templates improve upon the presence of key parameters in histopathology reports, but data are lacking on long-term sustainability of such reporting. From 2003 to 2006, the Cancer Registry of Norway and the Norwegian Society of Pathology collaborated on the development of a structured electronic template for histopathology reporting on colorectal carcinoma resections.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate use and long-term effect of this structured template in one of the first laboratories implementing the template for routine diagnostic work.
DESIGN: All histopathology reports (n =123) in the 1-year period prior to implementation were evaluated with respect to presence of key parameters. Likewise, all histopathology reports (n =1186) in the 5-year period after implementation were evaluated with respect to template use and presence of key parameters.
RESULTS: The electronic template had been used in 1089 (91.8%) of the 1186 cases. Template use was stable in the entire 5-year period, and had significantly improved upon the presence of data on 7 of 11 key parameters valid for both the pre-implementation and the post-implementation period. Eight hundred and twenty-two (75.5%) of the 1089 template reports contained information on all key parameters, compared to just 20 (16.3%) of the 123 free text reports in the 1-year pre-implementation period.
CONCLUSION: Electronic template reporting has a significant and sustainable long-term, positive effect upon the quality of histopathology reports.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22646273     DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2011-0370-OA

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  13 in total

Review 1.  Does standardised structured reporting contribute to quality in diagnostic pathology? The importance of evidence-based datasets.

Authors:  D W Ellis; J Srigley
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 2.  The ins and outs of molecular pathology reporting.

Authors:  Véronique Tack; Kelly Dufraing; Zandra C Deans; Han J van Krieken; Elisabeth M C Dequeker
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-03-26       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Implementation and use of electronic synoptic cancer reporting: an explorative case study of six Norwegian pathology laboratories.

Authors:  Bettina Casati; Hans Kristian Haugland; Gunn Marit J Barstad; Roger Bjugn
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 4.  Synoptic Reporting: Evidence-Based Review and Future Directions.

Authors:  Andrew A Renshaw; Mercy Mena-Allauca; Edwin W Gould; S Joseph Sirintrapun
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2018-12

5.  Identification of barriers and facilitators in nationwide implementation of standardized structured reporting in pathology: a mixed method study.

Authors:  J E M Swillens; C E Sluijter; L I H Overbeek; I D Nagtegaal; R P M G Hermens
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Factors affecting the implementation and use of electronic templates for histopathology cancer reporting.

Authors:  Bettina Casati; Hans Kristian Haugland; Gunn Marit J Barstad; Roger Bjugn
Journal:  Pathology       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.306

Review 7.  The effects of implementing synoptic pathology reporting in cancer diagnosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Caro E Sluijter; Luc R C W van Lonkhuijzen; Henk-Jan van Slooten; Iris D Nagtegaal; Lucy I H Overbeek
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 4.064

8.  Performance of a Web-based Method for Generating Synoptic Reports.

Authors:  Megan A Renshaw; Scott A Renshaw; Mercy Mena-Allauca; Patricia P Carrion; Xiaorong Mei; Arniris Narciandi; Edwin W Gould; Andrew A Renshaw
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2017-03-10

9.  Standardised reports with a template format are superior to free text reports: the case for rectal cancer reporting in clinical practice.

Authors:  P J Brown; H Rossington; J Taylor; D M J Lambregts; E Morris; N P West; P Quirke; D Tolan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Improving the creation and reporting of structured findings during digital pathology review.

Authors:  Ida Cervin; Jesper Molin; Claes Lundström
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2016-07-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.