Literature DB >> 22645830

Economic-based projections of future land use in the conterminous United States under alternative policy scenarios.

V C Radeloff1, E Nelson, A J Plantinga, D J Lewis, D Helmers, J J Lawler, J C Withey, F Beaudry, S Martinuzzi, V Butsic, E Lonsdorf, D White, S Polasky.   

Abstract

Land-use change significantly contributes to biodiversity loss, invasive species spread, changes in biogeochemical cycles, and the loss of ecosystem services. Planning for a sustainable future requires a thorough understanding of expected land use at the fine spatial scales relevant for modeling many ecological processes and at dimensions appropriate for regional or national-level policy making. Our goal was to construct and parameterize an econometric model of land-use change to project future land use to the year 2051 at a fine spatial scale across the conterminous United States under several alternative land-use policy scenarios. We parameterized the econometric model of land-use change with the National Resource Inventory (NRI) 1992 and 1997 land-use data for 844 000 sample points. Land-use transitions were estimated for five land-use classes (cropland, pasture, range, forest, and urban). We predicted land-use change under four scenarios: business-as-usual, afforestation, removal of agricultural subsidies, and increased urban rents. Our results for the business-as-usual scenario showed widespread changes in land use, affecting 36% of the land area of the conterminous United States, with large increases in urban land (79%) and forest (7%), and declines in cropland (-16%) and pasture (-13%). Areas with particularly high rates of land-use change included the larger Chicago area, parts of the Pacific Northwest, and the Central Valley of California. However, while land-use change was substantial, differences in results among the four scenarios were relatively minor. The only scenario that was markedly different was the afforestation scenario, which resulted in an increase of forest area that was twice as high as the business-as-usual scenario. Land-use policies can affect trends, but only so much. The basic economic and demographic factors shaping land-use changes in the United States are powerful, and even fairly dramatic policy changes, showed only moderate deviations from the business-as-usual scenario. Given the magnitude of predicted land-use change, any attempts to identify a sustainable future or to predict the effects of climate change will have to take likely land-use changes into account. Econometric models that can simulate land-use change for broad areas with fine resolution are necessary to predict trends in ecosystem service provision and biodiversity persistence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22645830     DOI: 10.1890/11-0306.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  11 in total

1.  Projected land-use change impacts on ecosystem services in the United States.

Authors:  Joshua J Lawler; David J Lewis; Erik Nelson; Andrew J Plantinga; Stephen Polasky; John C Withey; David P Helmers; Sebastián Martinuzzi; Derric Pennington; Volker C Radeloff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Climate change surpasses land-use change in the contracting range boundary of a winter-adapted mammal.

Authors:  Sean M Sultaire; Jonathan N Pauli; Karl J Martin; Michael W Meyer; Michael Notaro; Benjamin Zuckerberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Wilderness areas in a changing landscape: changes in land use, land cover, and climate.

Authors:  Jocelyn L Aycrigg; T Ryan Mccarley; R Travis Belote; Sebastian Martinuzzi
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 6.105

4.  Projected Impacts of Climate, Urbanization, Water Management, and Wetland Restoration on Waterbird Habitat in California's Central Valley.

Authors:  Elliott L Matchett; Joseph P Fleskes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Mediterranean California's water use future under multiple scenarios of developed and agricultural land use change.

Authors:  Tamara S Wilson; Benjamin M Sleeter; D Richard Cameron
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Modeling land use change and forest carbon stock changes in temperate forests in the United States.

Authors:  Lucia A Fitts; Matthew B Russell; Grant M Domke; Joseph K Knight
Journal:  Carbon Balance Manag       Date:  2021-07-03

7.  Agriculture and forest land use change in the continental United States: Are there tipping points?

Authors:  Angelo C Gurgel; John Reilly; Elodie Blanc
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-06-24

8.  Current and future land use around a nationwide protected area network.

Authors:  Christopher M Hamilton; Sebastian Martinuzzi; Andrew J Plantinga; Volker C Radeloff; David J Lewis; Wayne E Thogmartin; Patricia J Heglund; Anna M Pidgeon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Monitoring Network Confirms Land Use Change is a Substantial Component of the Forest Carbon Sink in the eastern United States.

Authors:  C W Woodall; B F Walters; J W Coulston; A W D'Amato; G M Domke; M B Russell; P A Sowers
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The southern megalopolis: using the past to predict the future of urban sprawl in the Southeast U.S.

Authors:  Adam J Terando; Jennifer Costanza; Curtis Belyea; Robert R Dunn; Alexa McKerrow; Jaime A Collazo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.