Literature DB >> 22645817

Geologic processes influence the effects of mining on aquatic ecosystems.

Travis S Schmidt1, William H Clements, Richard B Wanty, Philip L Verplanck, Stanley E Church, Carma A San Juan, David L Fey, Barnaby W Rockwell, Ed H DeWitt, Terry L Klein.   

Abstract

Geologic processes strongly influence water and sediment quality in aquatic ecosystems but rarely are geologic principles incorporated into routine biomonitoring studies. We test if elevated concentrations of metals in water and sediment are restricted to streams downstream of mines or areas that may discharge mine wastes. We surveyed 198 catchments classified as "historically mined" or "unmined," and based on mineral-deposit criteria, to determine whether water and sediment quality were influenced by naturally occurring mineralized rock, by historical mining, or by a combination of both. By accounting for different geologic sources of metals to the environment, we were able to distinguish aquatic ecosystems limited by metals derived from natural processes from those due to mining. Elevated concentrations of metals in water and sediment were not restricted to mined catchments; depauperate aquatic communities were found in unmined catchments. The type and intensity of hydrothermal alteration and the mineral deposit type were important determinants of water and sediment quality as well as the aquatic community in both mined and unmined catchments. This study distinguished the effects of different rock types and geologic sources of metals on ecosystems by incorporating basic geologic processes into reference and baseline site selection, resulting in a refined assessment. Our results indicate that biomonitoring studies should account for natural sources of metals in some geologic environments as contributors to the effect of mines on aquatic ecosystems, recognizing that in mining-impacted drainages there may have been high pre-mining background metal concentrations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22645817     DOI: 10.1890/11-0806.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  4 in total

1.  Does a sum of toxic units exceeding 1 imply adverse impacts on macroinvertebrate assemblages? A field study in a northern Japanese river receiving treated mine discharge.

Authors:  Yuichi Iwasaki; Megumi Fujisawa; Tagiru Ogino; Hiroyuki Mano; Naohide Shinohara; Shigeki Masunaga; Masashi Kamo
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  The Use of Field and Mesocosm Experiments to Quantify Effects of Physical and Chemical Stressors in Mining-Contaminated Streams.

Authors:  Pete Cadmus; William H Clements; Jacob L Williamson; James F Ranville; Joseph S Meyer; María Jesús Gutiérrez Ginés
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Bioaccumulation and Toxicity of Cadmium, Copper, Nickel, and Zinc and Their Mixtures to Aquatic Insect Communities.

Authors:  Christopher A Mebane; Travis S Schmidt; Janet L Miller; Laurie S Balistrieri
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.742

4.  Hydrotransport-Oriented Zn, Cu, and Pb Behavior Assessment and Source Identification in the River Network of a Historically Mined Area in the Hokuroku Basin, Northeast Japan.

Authors:  Qingqing Lu; Zhengfu Bian; Noriyoshi Tsuchiya
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.