Here, we present a simple modular extendable vector system for introducing the T7 RNA polymerase and tetracycline repressor genes into Trypanosoma brucei. This novel system exploits developments in our understanding of gene expression and genome organization to produce a streamlined plasmid optimized for high levels of expression of the introduced transgenes. We demonstrate the utility of this novel system in bloodstream and procyclic forms of Trypanosoma brucei, including the genome strain TREU927/4. We validate these cell lines using a variety of inducible experiments that recapture previously published lethal and non-lethal phenotypes. We further demonstrate the utility of the single marker (SmOx) TREU927/4 cell line for in vivo experiments in the tsetse fly and provide a set of plasmids that enable both whole-fly and salivary gland-specific inducible expression of transgenes.
Here, we present a simple modular extendable vector system for introducing the T7 RNA polymerase and tetracycline repressor genes into Trypanosoma brucei. This novel system exploits developments in our understanding of gene expression and genome organization to produce a streamlined plasmid optimized for high levels of expression of the introduced transgenes. We demonstrate the utility of this novel system in bloodstream and procyclic forms of Trypanosoma brucei, including the genome strain TREU927/4. We validate these cell lines using a variety of inducible experiments that recapture previously published lethal and non-lethal phenotypes. We further demonstrate the utility of the single marker (SmOx) TREU927/4 cell line for in vivo experiments in the tsetse fly and provide a set of plasmids that enable both whole-fly and salivary gland-specific inducible expression of transgenes.
The trypanosomatids are a group of unicellular eukaryotes, several of which cause
globally important parasitic diseases of humans and livestock. In sub-Saharan
Africa, one species of trypanosomatid, Trypanosoma brucei, causes
human African trypanosomiasis and the cattle disease nagana, which together impose a
huge burden on human health and welfare. In addition to its importance as the
etiological agent of a neglected disease of the developing world, T.
brucei is also a model organism for studying a large variety of
biological processes, including antigenic variation [1], the eukaryotic cilium and flagellum [2], glycosylphosphatidylinositol
anchors [3] and RNA editing [4]. As such, the trypanosomatids are
the focus of much attention from disparate academic communities and have provided a
wealth of insight into many fundamental aspects of biology.The ability to perform experiments on trypanosomatids was revolutionized by the
introduction of cell lines that stably expressed both the T7 RNA polymerase and the
tetracycline repressor protein (29 : 13, S16 and 13 : 90 cell lines) [5]. These cell lines have provided a
platform for the trypanosome research community for over 10 years, facilitating
advancement of our understanding of the disease and many aspects fundamental to
eukaryotic biology. Additional cell lines expressing the T7 RNA polymerase, the
tetracycline repressor or both have also been generated [6-8]. These have opened up further avenues of interrogation and
experimentation within the tsetse fly [8].There is a need to be able to easily extend the range of trypanosomes in which one
can do inducible experimentation. For example, there are currently no inducible cell
lines for performing experiments in the human-infective Trypanosoma brucei
gambiense or Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense. Moreover,
there is also no inducible version of the genome strain TREU927/4 [9].The ability to use novel cell lines and perform inducible experimentation in
disparate strains and novel field isolates will be critical to future trypanosomatid
research in a post-genomic era. To pre-empt this emerging need, we analysed and
exploited the available genome information to develop a single marker modular vector
system for introducing the T7 polymerase and tetracycline repressor genes into any
trypanosomatid species. We demonstrate that this system works for the genome strain
TREU927/4 and Lister 427 (bloodstream and procyclic) T. brucei
parasites. We also show that TREU927/4-derived cells can be used equally well for
in vitro- and in vivo-inducible experiments in
tsetse flies.
Material and methods
Plasmid construction
The Single Marker Oxford (SmOx) plasmid was constructed de novo
using a combination of the Paraflagellar rod protein 2 (PFR2) intergenic
sequences amplified from TREU927/4 genomic DNA, synthetic codon-optimized genes
(MrGene, Invitrogen) and the necessary bacterial origin of replication and
ampicillin-resistance gene from pDex-577 [7]. PFR2 intergenic sequences were selected as
they are short and contain well-characterized trans-splicing and polyadenylation
sites [10]. Codon optimization
was performed as it has been previously reported that translational selection
may impact on protein expression in trypanosomatids [11]. Codon selection for the transgenes was made
based on a bioinformatic analysis of all available trypanosomatid genomes, so
that the transgenes would use codons that are frequently used in all
trypanosomatids. The plasmid was sequenced to 3X coverage using the
EZ-Tn5TM KAN-2 Insertion kit (Epicentre Technologies Co.). The
vector sequence is provided as electronic supplementary material, file S1. For
transfection into T. brucei cells, the vector was linearized by
restriction digest with HindIII, which excises the bacterial
component of the plasmid so that only the desired transgenes and necessary
intergenic regions are integrated into the genome. For transfection, 10
μg of the SmOx plasmid was linearized with HindIII and
transfected into each of TREU927/4, Lister 427 procyclic and Lister 427
bloodstream forms to create SmOxP927, SmOxP427 and SmOxB427, respectively. To
calculate the mean doubling time for each cell line, cells were sub-cultured
every 24 h for 5 days to the same cell density (1 × 106 or 1
× 105 cells ml−1 for procyclic and
bloodstream form, respectively). The mean and standard deviation were computed
treating each 24 h period as replicates.
Codon optimization
All genome data were retrieved from TriTrypDB.org [12]. Codon usage statistics were computed using a
method previously described [13]. In brief, the Carbone codon adaptation index (cCAI) score [13] is an optimized codon
adaptation index score that uses the genes that display the strongest codon bias
to compute a codon usage matrix and then re-scores every other gene according to
this matrix; iterations of this process lead to identification of the most
commonly used codons in any genome [13]. Given that codon usage is intrinsically liked to gene mRNA
levels in all organisms, we chose to optimize the T7 RNA polymerase and
tetracycline repressor for expression in trypanosomatids using a consensus of
optimal codons computed from the available trypanosomatid genomes. Genes were
re-encoded to use the codons that occur most frequently in trypanosomatids and
synthesized (MrGene, Invitrogen).
Inducible transgene expression
For each cell line, 10 μg pDex777-GFP plasmid (the sequence is provided as
electronic supplementary material, file S2) was linearized with
NotI restriction endonuclease and transfected into
SmOxP427, SmOxP927, 29 : 13 [5],
SmOx2B427 and S16 [5] cells.
Cells were subsequently selected with 1 µg ml−1
puromycin and 5 µg ml−1 phleomycin (Sigma-Aldrich).
After selection, cell lines were removed from puromycin and phleomycin for 48 h
with sub-culturing of cells to either 1 × 106 or 1 ×
105 every 24 h for procyclic and bloodstream-form cells,
respectively. At 48 h, GFP expression was induced by the addition of 1 µg
ml−1 doxycycline (Sigma-Aldrich) to the culture medium.
For flow cytometry analysis, four independent clones of each cell line were
selected at random following the transfection of the pDex-777 plasmid. As above
cell lines were sub-cultured every 24 h to the same cell density (1 ×
106 or 1 × 105 cells ml−1)
for 48 h before induction. Green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression was
induced by the addition of 1 µg ml−1 doxycycline to
culture medium. Twenty-four hours post-induction, cells were fixed by the
addition of paraformaldehyde directly to the culture medium and incubating for
10 min. The final concentration of paraformaldehyde was 1 per cent. Cells were
then washed and resuspended in PBS. Data were acquired with a FACSCalibur flow
cytometer (BD Biosciences).
Inducible transgene expression in tsetse flies
For assaying inducible transgene expression in the tsetse fly, procyclic form
trypanosomes of a single clone of each of TREU927/4, SmOxP927, SmOxP927
containing the pDex-777 plasmid and SmOxP927 cells containing the pDex-577
[7] plasmid were fed to
individual groups of tsetse (Glossina sp.) via a silicone
membrane, as previously described [14]. Flies were maintained at 25°C, 70 per cent relative
humidity and fed on sterile horse blood supplemented with 2.5 per cent wt/vol
BSA [15] and 1 mM dATP [16]. Thirty days post-infection
flies were starved for 2 days and then fed on horse serum containing
tetracycline (25 μg ml−1) for 20 min. Two days later,
the midgut, proventriculus and salivary glands were dissected separately into
PBS and inspected by fluorescence microscopy for the presence of GFP fluorescent
trypanosome cells.
Inducible RNA interference
Inducible RNA interference in the SmOx cell lines was tested using the PFR2 RNAi
vector [17]. For each cell
line, 10 μg of PFR2 RNAi plasmid DNA was linearized with
NotI restriction endonuclease and transfected into
SmOxP427, SmOxP927 and SmOxB427 cells. Cells were then selected with 1 µg
ml−1 puromycin and 5 µg ml−1
phleomycin. Following selection, cell lines were removed from any puromycin and
phleomycin for 48 h. Cells were then sub-cultured every 24 h to the same cell
density (1 × 106 or 1 × 105 cells
ml−1 for procyclic and bloodstream form, respectively).
After 48 h, RNAi was induced by the addition of 1 µg
ml−1 doxycycline to the culture medium. Cell density and
cell size measurements were performed using CASY model TT cell-counter
(Innovatis). For western blot analysis, protein samples were collected every 24
h during the 96 h induction. Transmission electron microscopy analysis was
performed on cells that had been induced for 72 h. At 96 h post-induction, cells
were spun down, washed in fresh medium and recovered in medium without
doxycycline for 24 h to determine if cells could be de-induced. For western blot
analysis of protein levels 5 × 106 cells from each time point
for each cell line were loaded onto a 10 per cent sodium dodecyl sulphatepolyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) gel. Following transfer, PFR2
protein was detected using the anti-PFR2 antibody L8C4 [18] at a 1 : 1000 dilution. Rabbit anti-mouse IgG
(whole molecule)-peroxidise-conjugated antibody (Sigma-Aldrich) at 1 : 20 000
dilution was used for ECL detection using standard protocols.
Results
A modular single marker vector (SmOx) for generation of trypanosome cell
lines expressing T7 RNA polymerase and the tetracycline repressor
protein
A simple modular plasmid was designed to integrate into the tubulin gene locus
replacing the first β-tubulin gene. This locus has been repeatedly used
by trypanosome researchers as a reliable genomic location to generate
read-through transcription and is the same location used in previous inducible
strains [5]. We designed the
vector so that, upon linearization, the bacterial component of the plasmid is
excised and only the desired coding sequences and intergenic sequences are
integrated into the genome (figure
1). The plasmid is designed to exploit the fact that trypanosomes
employ polycistronic transcription for transcription of protein-coding genes,
and hence there are no promoter sequences included in the plasmid. The plasmid
was also designed to integrate cleanly into the trypanosome genome. The strategy
employed was to replace the first β-tubulin gene (from start codon to
stop codon) in the tubulin gene array on chromosome 1. No gene truncations or
partial gene fragments were created in this integration (figure 1). A previously validated nuclear
localization sequence from the trypanosome LA protein [19] was added to the N-terminus of both the T7
RNA polymerase and the Tet repressor gene to facilitate nuclear targeting of the
expressed transgenes. To enhance translational efficiency and enable the
broadest possible use for the transgenes in trypanosomatids, codon optimization
of the transgenes was performed based on an analysis of codon usage frequency in
all trypanosomatid genomes (table
1).
Figure 1.
Cartoon of the genome before and after integration of the SmOx
plasmid. β is the β-tubulin gene. α is the
α-tubulin gene. T7 RNAP is the T7 RNA polymerase.
PurR is the puromycin-resistance gene.
TetR is the tetracycline repressor gene.
AmpR is the ampicillin-resistance gene encoded on the
bacterial part of the plasmid. Grey inset contains cartoon of
plasmid prior to restriction digest with HindIII.
Restriction sites indicated by red bars.
Table 1
Table of codon usage in available trypanosomatid genomes. For each
amino acid, codons are presented in descending order according to
their mean codon usage score across all trypanosomatid genomes. The
most commonly occurring codon for each amino acid is given a score
of 1. The score for each subsequent codon represents the frequency
of occurrence relative to the most common codon (e.g. a score of 0.5
indicates that this codon is used 50% less frequently than
the most frequently used codon for this amino acid).
amino acid
codon
Trypanosoma vivax
Trypanosoma brucei
gambiense
Trypanosoma brucei
Trypanosoma congolense
Trypanosoma cruzi
Leishmania mexicana
Leishmania major
Leishmania infantum
Leishmania braziliensis
A
GCG
1.00
0.91
0.81
0.99
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
GCC
0.76
0.79
0.72
0.91
0.76
0.83
0.79
0.83
0.84
GCA
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.77
0.47
0.45
0.46
0.59
GCT
0.71
0.93
0.78
0.90
0.60
0.42
0.40
0.41
0.51
C
TGC
1.00
0.96
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
TGT
0.75
1.00
0.90
0.90
0.79
0.30
0.29
0.27
0.37
D
GAC
1.00
0.79
0.86
0.94
0.91
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
GAT
0.82
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.43
0.42
0.43
0.48
E
GAG
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
GAA
0.67
0.83
0.91
0.70
0.69
0.24
0.24
0.24
0.28
F
TTC
0.69
0.72
0.75
0.73
0.42
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
TTT
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.57
0.55
0.55
0.66
G
GGC
1.00
0.64
0.73
0.91
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
GGT
0.85
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.84
0.39
0.37
0.35
0.47
GGG
0.70
0.65
0.65
0.81
0.77
0.39
0.36
0.34
0.41
GGA
0.62
0.68
0.76
0.77
0.74
0.21
0.19
0.19
0.26
H
CAC
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
CAT
0.66
0.86
0.84
0.71
0.90
0.33
0.32
0.33
0.36
I
ATC
0.65
0.60
0.61
0.66
0.54
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
ATT
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.46
0.44
0.45
0.57
ATA
0.49
0.54
0.60
0.53
0.33
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.19
K
AAG
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
AAA
0.63
0.78
0.94
0.74
0.74
0.21
0.20
0.21
0.25
L
CTG
1.00
0.80
0.86
1.00
100
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
CTC
0.72
0.69
0.71
0.78
0.54
0.68
0.65
0.67
0.70
CTT
0.90
1.00
1.00
0.97
0.88
0.30
0.29
0.30
0.36
TTG
0.78
0.88
0.90
0.87
0.88
0.30
0.29
0.29
0.33
CTA
0.33
0.35
0.45
0.34
0.20
0.13
0.12
0.13
0.17
TTA
0.28
0.45
0.49
0.41
0.30
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.07
M
ATG
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
N
AAC
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.95
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
AAT
0.75
0.94
0.89
0.90
1.00
0.27
0.26
0.26
0.35
P
CCG
0.89
0.84
0.80
0.97
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
CCA
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.91
0.44
0.40
0.41
0.58
CCC
0.72
0.84
0.77
0.90
0.69
0.50
0.48
0.48
0.57
CCT
0.74
0.83
0.77
0.82
0.67
0.36
0.33
0.35
0.45
Q
CAG
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
CAA
0.64
0.82
0.88
0.67
0.66
0.24
0.23
0.23
0.28
R
CGC
1.00
0.90
0.93
1.00
0.92
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
CGT
0.76
1.00
1.00
0.90
1.00
0.34
0.33
0.32
0.40
CGG
0.56
0.77
0.79
0.79
0.79
0.45
0.43
0.43
0.44
AGG
0.60
0.64
0.69
0.75
0.63
0.19
0.18
0.17
0.22
CGA
0.47
0.57
0.61
0.56
0.61
0.25
0.23
0.23
0.29
AGA
0.41
0.43
0.52
0.50
0.41
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.12
S
AGC
1.00
0.88
0.98
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
TCG
0.72
0.80
0.77
0.78
0.91
0.83
0.84
0.83
0.80
TCC
0.66
0.86
0.81
0.85
0.98
0.68
0.65
0.64
0.67
TCT
0.69
0.90
0.84
0.76
0.94
0.41
0.39
0.40
0.47
AGT
0.77
1.00
1.00
0.88
0.88
0.31
0.28
0.29
0.39
TCA
0.67
0.93
0.93
0.82
0.85
0.32
0.29
0.29
0.40
T
ACG
0.92
0.86
0.76
0.95
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
ACA
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.78
0.43
0.42
0.41
0.57
ACC
0.62
0.72
0.65
0.80
0.57
0.74
0.72
0.70
0.82
ACT
0.63
0.78
0.66
0.73
0.50
0.29
0.28
0.28
0.42
V
GTG
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
GTT
0.65
0.82
0.82
0.69
0.52
0.24
0.23
0.23
0.27
GTC
0.40
0.41
0.42
0.41
0.35
0.52
0.50
0.54
0.51
GTA
0.32
0.44
0.48
0.36
0.23
0.15
0.14
0.15
0.20
W
TGG
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Y
TAC
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
TAT
0.66
0.83
0.82
0.72
0.62
0.21
0.20
0.20
0.25
STOP
TGA
1.00
1.00
0.96
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
TAG
0.73
0.73
0.66
0.69
0.24
0.80
0.85
0.82
0.84
TAA
0.64
0.94
1.00
0.91
0.37
0.46
0.46
0.45
0.54
Table of codon usage in available trypanosomatid genomes. For each
amino acid, codons are presented in descending order according to
their mean codon usage score across all trypanosomatid genomes. The
most commonly occurring codon for each amino acid is given a score
of 1. The score for each subsequent codon represents the frequency
of occurrence relative to the most common codon (e.g. a score of 0.5
indicates that this codon is used 50% less frequently than
the most frequently used codon for this amino acid).Cartoon of the genome before and after integration of the SmOx
plasmid. β is the β-tubulin gene. α is the
α-tubulin gene. T7 RNAP is the T7 RNA polymerase.
PurR is the puromycin-resistance gene.
TetR is the tetracycline repressor gene.
AmpR is the ampicillin-resistance gene encoded on the
bacterial part of the plasmid. Grey inset contains cartoon of
plasmid prior to restriction digest with HindIII.
Restriction sites indicated by red bars.
T7 polymerase and Tet repressor transgenes are expressed
To determine whether the introduced transgenes resulted in the production of
expressed protein, we analysed the expression of the T7 polymerase and Tet
repressor by western blot (figure
2a). This analysis showed that both the transgenes
were expressed. Moreover, the Tet repressor gene was expressed to higher levels
than in previous cell lines, presumably through the combined effects of codon
optimization and the use of different UTR sequences (figure 2a). T7 RNA polymerase
expression appears lower in SmOxP427 cells than in SmOxP927 or 29 : 13. In
contrast to this, T7 RNA polymerase expression in SmOxB427 was substantially
higher than in S16. While some variation across strains was observed, no
variation within strains could be detected by western blot analysis of multiple
independent clones (data not shown). The average doubling time of the novel SmOx
cell lines did not differ from their parental cell lines (figure 2b,c).
Also, there was no detectable difference in cell volume or cell morphology (data
not shown).
Figure 2.
Expression and growth analysis of SmOx cell lines.
(a) Western blots showing the expression of T7
RNA polymerase and tetracycline repressor proteins in all SmOx cell
lines. For comparison, 29 : 13 and S16 cells are also shown.
(b) Growth rate of SmOx procyclic-form cell
lines compared with their parental cell lines. (c)
Growth rate of the SmOx bloodstream form cell line compared with its
parental cell line. In all cases, PF is procyclic form and BF is
bloodstream form. Error bars indicate the spread of the data.
Loading controls for western blots are provided as the electronic
supplementary material, file S3.
Expression and growth analysis of SmOx cell lines.
(a) Western blots showing the expression of T7
RNA polymerase and tetracycline repressor proteins in all SmOx cell
lines. For comparison, 29 : 13 and S16 cells are also shown.
(b) Growth rate of SmOx procyclic-form cell
lines compared with their parental cell lines. (c)
Growth rate of the SmOx bloodstream form cell line compared with its
parental cell line. In all cases, PF is procyclic form and BF is
bloodstream form. Error bars indicate the spread of the data.
Loading controls for western blots are provided as the electronic
supplementary material, file S3.
Cell lines function in inducible transgene tests
Having determined that the SmOx cell lines expressed the desired transgenes and
demonstrated no observable growth defects, a subsequent test was designed to
determine whether the newly created cell lines were capable of
tetracycline-inducible regulation of gene expression. The pDex-777 plasmid
(electronic supplementary material, file S2) was used. This plasmid integrates
into the mini chromosomes and encodes a GFP gene under the control of a T7 RNA
polymerase promoter. Three tetracycline operators are positioned between the T7
promoter and the GFP-coding sequence, allowing tetracycline-dependent control of
transgene expression. Four independent clones for each of the three SmOx cell
lines were induced for 24 h, and GFP expression was analysed by flow cytometry
(figure 3). This revealed
that for procyclic-form SmOxP427 (figure
3a) and SmOxP927-(figure 3b), inducible GFP
expression was comparable with that observed in 29 : 13 (figure 3c). For both SmOxP427 and
SmOxP927, non-induced cells were less fluorescent compared with parental no
vector control than the equivalent 29 : 13 cells. This suggests that the
non-induced state in the SmOx cells is more transcriptionally silent than in 29
: 13. However, SmOxP427 (figure
3a) and SmOxP927 (figure 3b) demonstrated more
variability between clones in expression level obtained, with the mean
expression in SmOx927 being higher than in 29 : 13 and the mean expression in
SmOxP427 being lower than in 29 : 13 cells. Similarly, SmOxB427 cells exhibited
more variability between clones, though expression in all clones was higher than
that observed for S16 cells (figure
3d,e). No difference could be
detected between the parental and non-induced bloodstream or procyclic-form SmOx
cell lines, demonstrating that the non-induced cells have no detectable
expression of GFP.
Figure 3.
Comparison of inducible transgene expression between cell lines. In
each case, four independent clones of pDex-777-containing cell lines
were induced for 24 h. Flow cytometry measurements using identical
settings were performed on induced (green lines) and non-induced
(black lines) parental non-transfected clones (grey lines).
(a) SmOxP427. (b) SmOxP927.
(c) 29 : 13. (d) SmOxB427.
(e) S16.
Comparison of inducible transgene expression between cell lines. In
each case, four independent clones of pDex-777-containing cell lines
were induced for 24 h. Flow cytometry measurements using identical
settings were performed on induced (green lines) and non-induced
(black lines) parental non-transfected clones (grey lines).
(a) SmOxP427. (b) SmOxP927.
(c) 29 : 13. (d) SmOxB427.
(e) S16.
Cell lines function in RNA interference tests
To determine whether RNA interference using established RNAi tools [20] was also possible, we
evaluated the ability of the SmOxP427, SmOxP927 and SmOxB427 to recapitulate a
previously characterized RNAi phenotype [17]. We selected the PFR2 gene [17] for this purpose as there is
a defined and readily observable phenotype in procyclic-form cells and it is
lethal in bloodstream-form cells. The same PFR2 RNAi plasmid was used as
described previously [17] and
transfected into each of SmOxP427, SmOxP927 and SmOxB427. In all cases, the
observed phenotypes were as expected. In both the procyclic-form SmOx cell
lines, there was a reduction in PFR2 protein levels observed by western blot
(figure 4a).
At 72 h post-induction, SmOxP427 and SmOxP927 cells were analysed by
transmission electron microscopy for the presence of the PFR structure. The
number of axonemal cross-sections which had no observable PFR structure
associated with the axoneme was recorded (figure 4b). In agreement with
previous experiments using 29 : 13 cells, there was a dramatic loss of the PFR
structure upon induction of RNAi against PFR2, and induction of PFR2 RNAi in the
bloodstream form was lethal within 24 h (data not shown).
Figure 4.
Analysis of RNAi phenotypes by a variety of methods.
(a) Western blot analysis of the Paraflagellar
rod protein 2 (PFR2) protein levels following induction of PFR2 RNAi
in SmOx P427 and SmOx P927 cell lines. wt is the parental strain not
containing the integrated SmOx plasmid. No Dox is the non-induced
control. Asterisk (*) indicates cells that, following 96 h of
induction of RNAi, were pelleted, washed and resuspended in fresh
medium in the absence of doxycycline and allowed to recover for 24
h. (b) Electron microscopy analysis of cross
sections of axonemes. Individual axonemes were scored for the
presence or the absence of a recognizable PFR structure. Loading
controls for western blots are provided as electronic supplementary
material, file S3.
Analysis of RNAi phenotypes by a variety of methods.
(a) Western blot analysis of the Paraflagellar
rod protein 2 (PFR2) protein levels following induction of PFR2 RNAi
in SmOx P427 and SmOx P927 cell lines. wt is the parental strain not
containing the integrated SmOx plasmid. No Dox is the non-induced
control. Asterisk (*) indicates cells that, following 96 h of
induction of RNAi, were pelleted, washed and resuspended in fresh
medium in the absence of doxycycline and allowed to recover for 24
h. (b) Electron microscopy analysis of cross
sections of axonemes. Individual axonemes were scored for the
presence or the absence of a recognizable PFR structure. Loading
controls for western blots are provided as electronic supplementary
material, file S3.
Genome strain-derived SmOxP927 cells can be used for in vivo
studies in tsetse flies
Having demonstrated the functionality of SmOx cell lines under cell culture
conditions, we evaluated the newly generated SmOxP927 cell line for inducible
experimentation in tsetse flies. SmOxP927 cells were transfected with one or
other of two tetracycline-inducible plasmids pDex-577 [7] and pDex-777. These two plasmids are identical
in sequence except for the 3′UTR immediately downstream of the inducible
transgene. pDex-577 has an aldolase 3′UTR and pDex-777 has PFR2
3′UTR immediately downstream of the GFP-coding sequences. Procyclic forms
of each cloned SmOxP927 cell line were used to infect tsetse flies. Thirty days
post-feeding, GFP was induced by feeding half of the infected tsetse flies with
horse serum containing tetracycline and the other half was fed horse serum
without tetracycline as a non-induced control. Two days later 66 flies were
dissected, of which 48 had a midgut infection, 46 had an infected preventriculus
and 24 had a salivary gland infection. There were no observed differences in
infection rate between induced and non-induced cells. No GFP-positive T.
brucei cells were found in either parental or non-induced infected
flies. Interestingly, upon induction, the two plasmids used produced
dramatically different expression patterns within the fly (figure 5). For pDex-577, GFP fluorescent
trypanosomes were observed only in the salivary glands. Trypanosome cells
infecting the midgut and proventriculus had no detectable GFP fluorescence
(figure 5). In contrast,
induction of pDex-777 produced green fluorescent trypanosome cells in all three
compartments of infected flies (figure
5), including proventricular forms.
Figure 5.
Inducible transgene expression in SmOxP927 cells in different
compartments of the tsetse fly. Forty-eight hours-induced cells are
shown for both the pDex-577 and pDex-777 plasmid. All images taken
at the same magnification; scale bar indicates 50 μm.
Representative GFP fluorescence (GFP) and phase contrast (Phase)
images are shown for each infected compartment of the fly. The
midgut image for pDex-577 shows trypanosome cells that have spilled
out of the dissected midgut. The midgut image for pDex-777 shows a
midgut full of fluorescent trypanosome cells, in which it is
difficult to resolve individual cells. The proventriculus images for
both pDex-577 and pDex-777 show an infected proventriculus with
trypanosome cells. The salivary gland images for pDex-577 and
pDex-777 show an infected salivary gland.
Inducible transgene expression in SmOxP927 cells in different
compartments of the tsetse fly. Forty-eight hours-induced cells are
shown for both the pDex-577 and pDex-777 plasmid. All images taken
at the same magnification; scale bar indicates 50 μm.
Representative GFP fluorescence (GFP) and phase contrast (Phase)
images are shown for each infected compartment of the fly. The
midgut image for pDex-577 shows trypanosome cells that have spilled
out of the dissected midgut. The midgut image for pDex-777 shows a
midgut full of fluorescent trypanosome cells, in which it is
difficult to resolve individual cells. The proventriculus images for
both pDex-577 and pDex-777 show an infected proventriculus with
trypanosome cells. The salivary gland images for pDex-577 and
pDex-777 show an infected salivary gland.
Discussion
We present a novel single marker plasmid that integrates into a defined locus to
produce T. brucei cells expressing the T7 RNA polymerase and the
tetracycline repressor gene. This work presents advancement over existing
technologies in the light of recent genomic data. The design of the plasmid is
streamlined and modular, allowing future elaboration and modification. We
demonstrate the utility of this plasmid in two independent strains and life-cycle
stages of T. brucei. In all tests, the cell lines created perform
as well as or better than pre-existing laboratory strains. Under normal cell culture
conditions, these cell lines grow without any apparent growth defect, they have
normal morphology, they express high levels of the desired transgenes in both
procyclic- and bloodstream-form cells, and they exhibit both high inducibility and
tight repression of expression. In side-by-side tests under normal growth
conditions, they also grow faster than pre-existing inducible cell lines, allowing
for more rapid selection of transformed cells. Furthermore, requirement for only a
single selectable marker renders more selectable markers available for use.We show that these cell lines are capable of both inducible transgene expression and
inducible RNAi, and recapitulate both lethal and non-lethal phenotypes previously
published using other strains. We also provide further validation of the genome
strain-derived SmOxP927 cell line by demonstrating that this cell line can be used
for tetracycline-inducible experimentation in the tsetse fly as well as in routine
cell culture. This novel feature will enable more rapid transition from in
vitro to in vivo experimentation in the future. By
using two different plasmids, which differ only in the 3′UTR associated with
the reporter gene, we also provide an additional inducible expression resource
demonstrating that it is possible to perform compartment-specific-inducible gene
expression within the tsetse fly. This result indicates that careful selection of
3′UTR sequences may be important for in vivo experiments in
tsetse flies.In addition to the benefits of using a single-resistance marker and having both high
inducibility and low leakiness, this single marker vector system will also increase
the capability of the trypanosomatid research community by facilitating the use of
novel strains and field isolates of trypanosomatids for inducible experimentation.
This system will also enable continued used of pre-existing expression technologies
dependent on both T7 RNA polymerase and the tetracycline repressor, and will
therefore further the spread of these powerful technologies within the field. Future
developments of this modular system could exploit additional repressor proteins or
use the Cre-Lox recombinase that has been previously used successfully in
trypanosomatids [21] to enable the
recovery of selectable markers.
Authors: Lori Peacock; Vanessa Ferris; Reuben Sharma; Jack Sunter; Mick Bailey; Mark Carrington; Wendy Gibson Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-02-14 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Martin Aslett; Cristina Aurrecoechea; Matthew Berriman; John Brestelli; Brian P Brunk; Mark Carrington; Daniel P Depledge; Steve Fischer; Bindu Gajria; Xin Gao; Malcolm J Gardner; Alan Gingle; Greg Grant; Omar S Harb; Mark Heiges; Christiane Hertz-Fowler; Robin Houston; Frank Innamorato; John Iodice; Jessica C Kissinger; Eileen Kraemer; Wei Li; Flora J Logan; John A Miller; Siddhartha Mitra; Peter J Myler; Vishal Nayak; Cary Pennington; Isabelle Phan; Deborah F Pinney; Gowthaman Ramasamy; Matthew B Rogers; David S Roos; Chris Ross; Dhileep Sivam; Deborah F Smith; Ganesh Srinivasamoorthy; Christian J Stoeckert; Sandhya Subramanian; Ryan Thibodeau; Adrian Tivey; Charles Treatman; Giles Velarde; Haiming Wang Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2009-10-20 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Steven Kelly; Jenny Reed; Susanne Kramer; Louise Ellis; Helena Webb; Jack Sunter; Jeanne Salje; Nina Marinsek; Keith Gull; Bill Wickstead; Mark Carrington Journal: Mol Biochem Parasitol Date: 2007-03-27 Impact factor: 1.759
Authors: Danielle M N Moura; Christian R S Reis; Camila C Xavier; Tamara D da Costa Lima; Rodrigo P Lima; Mark Carrington; Osvaldo P de Melo Neto Journal: RNA Biol Date: 2015 Impact factor: 4.652
Authors: Beatrice Freya Lucy Edwards; Richard John Wheeler; Amy Rachel Barker; Flávia Fernandes Moreira-Leite; Keith Gull; Jack Daniel Sunter Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-07-20 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Paul J Guyett; Shuangluo Xia; David C Swinney; Michael P Pollastri; Kojo Mensa-Wilmot Journal: ACS Infect Dis Date: 2016-06-16 Impact factor: 5.084
Authors: Lenka Horváthová; Vojtěch Žárský; Tomáš Pánek; Romain Derelle; Jan Pyrih; Alžběta Motyčková; Veronika Klápšťová; Martina Vinopalová; Lenka Marková; Luboš Voleman; Vladimír Klimeš; Markéta Petrů; Zuzana Vaitová; Ivan Čepička; Klára Hryzáková; Karel Harant; Michael W Gray; Mohamed Chami; Ingrid Guilvout; Olivera Francetic; B Franz Lang; Čestmír Vlček; Anastasios D Tsaousis; Marek Eliáš; Pavel Doležal Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-05-19 Impact factor: 14.919