| Literature DB >> 22645430 |
Innocenzo Muzzalupo1, Barbara Macchione, Cristina Bucci, Francesca Stefanizzi, Enzo Perri, Adriana Chiappetta, Antonio Tagarelli, Giovanni Sindona.
Abstract
The quality of olive oil is influenced by genetic and environmental factors and by the maturation state of drupes, but it is equally affected by technological treatments of the process. This work investigates the possible correlation between olive LOX gene transcript accumulation, evaluated in fruits collected at different stages of maturation, and chemical biomarkers of its activity. During olive fruit ripening, the same genotype harvested from two different farms shows a positive linear trend between LOX relative transcript accumulation and the content of volatile compounds present in the olive oil aroma. Interestingly, a negative linear trend was observed between LOX relative transcript accumulation and the content of volatile compounds present in the olive pastes obtained from olive fruits with and without malaxation. The changes in the olive LOX transcript accumulation reveal its environmental regulation and suggest differential physiological functions for the LOXs.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22645430 PMCID: PMC3353494 DOI: 10.1100/2012/532179
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Figure 1Scheme of the lipoxygenase metabolic pathway.
Figure 2Map of areas where samples were collected. The samples come from two different growing places of the Calabria region (Italy).
Figure 3Transcript accumulation of LOX gene in “Coratina” cv fruits harvested at three stages of ripening (170 days after flowering DAF = green mature; 200 DAF = black with <50% purple flesh; 230 DAF = black with >50% purple flesh) and in two different cultivation areas (Rende and Mirto-Crosia). To “Coratina” samples collected on the 170 DAF stage, (↓) was assigned the value of 1.0 and it was used as calibrators. Data are expressed as mean values ± standard deviation of three independent experiments. Duncan test has been used to assess significance (P = 0.05). Values followed by different letters in the same line are significantly different.
Content of five volatile biomarkers: (2-(E)-hexenal, hexanal, 1-hexanol, (E)-2-hexen-1-ol, and (Z)-3-hexen-1-yl acetate) analyzed in the olive pastes obtained from “Coratina” cv. Samples were performed with and without malaxation (OP1, t = 0 min; OP2, t = 30 min). The drupes were collected at three developmental stage of ripening (170 days after flowering DAF = green mature; 200 DAF = black with <50% purple flesh; 230 DAF = black with >50% purple flesh) and in two different cultivation areas (Rende and Mirto-Crosia). Data on volatile biomarkers contents from olive paste are expressed in mg/kg. Data are expressed as mean values ± standard deviation of three independent experiments. Duncan test has been used to assess significance (P = 0.05). Values followed by different letters in the same line are significantly different. n.d.: not detected.
| Volatile compounds (mg kg−1) | Mirto-Crosia | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| hexanal | 1.89 ± 0.39a | 2.50 ± 0.72a | 2.32 ± 0.60a | 2.04 ± 0.61a | 0.93 ± 0.22b | 1.42 ± 0.31b |
| (E)-2-hexenal | 17.39 ± 1.55a | 12.68 ± 1.17b | 10.42 ± 0.82c | 14.26 ± 1.04d | 8.61 ± 0.76e | 7.17 ± 0.81e |
| (E)-2-hexen-1-ol | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. |
| 1-hexanol | 0.92 ± 0.09a | 0.93 ± 0.08a | 0.99 ± 0.10a | 1.03 ± 0.10a | 0.45 ± 0.05b | 0.53 ± 0.05b |
| ( | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. |
|
| ||||||
| Rende | ||||||
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| ||||||
| hexanal | 0.25 ± 0.08a | 0.21 ± 0.07a | 0.41 ± 0.07a | 0.28 ± 0.07a | 0.66 ± 0.18b | 0.61 ± 0.17b |
| (E)-2-hexenal | 19.91 ± 1.18a | 15.01 ± 1.02b | 14.53 ± 0.92b | 16.95 ± 0.98b | 11.67 ± 1.17c | 10.48 ± 1.04c |
| (E)-2-hexen-1-ol | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. |
| 1-hexanol | n.d. | 0.91 ± 0.09a | 0.91 ± 0.09a | 0.92 ± 0.09a | 0.98 ± 0.10a | 0.98 ± 0.10a |
| ( | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. |
Virgin olive oil quality indices from “Coratina” cv after malaxation (t = 30 min). The yield in oil (in % on dry matter), the content of volatile biomarkers (in mg kg−1 oil), the main fatty acids (in %), and the total phenols (in mg kg−1 in caffeic acid) are reported. The drupes were collected at three developmental stage of ripening (170 days after flowering DAF = green mature; 200 DAF = black with <50% purple flesh; 230 DAF = black with >50% purple flesh) and in two different cultivation areas (Rende and Mirto-Crosia). Data are expressed as mean values ± standard deviation of three independent experiments. Duncan test has been used to assess significance (P = 0.05). Values followed by different letters in the same line are significantly different. n.d.: not detected.
| Mirto-Crosia | Rende | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Yield in oil (% dry matter) | 42.7 ± 1.9a | 47.8 ± 2.3b | 50.3 ± 2.8b | 41.2 ± 2.2a | 46.2 ± 2.8b | 50.0 ± 2.2b | |
|
| |||||||
| hexanal | 1.66 ± 0.52a | 2.56 ± 0.75ab | 1.52 ± 0.49a | 0.51 ± 0.11c | 0.46 ± 0.09c | 0.79 ± 0.19c | |
| (E)-2-hexenal | 20.2 ± 1.6a | 25.8 ± 2.6ab | 18.5 ± 1.8ac | 38.8 ± 2.2d | 45.2 ± 3.0e | 24.4 ± 2.4ab | |
| Volatile compounds (mg kg−1) | (E)-2-hexen-1-ol | 1.58 ± 0.58a | n.d. | 1.45 ± 0.52a | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. |
| 1-hexanol | 0.96 ± 0.09a | 0.93 ± 0.09a | 0.88 ± 0.08a | n.d. | 0.92 ± 0.09a | 0.91 ± 0.09a | |
| ( | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | |
|
| |||||||
| Palmitic ac. (C16 : 0) | 10.89 ± 0.89a | 10.52 ± 0.99a | 10.04 ± 0.78a | 12.3 ± 1.0ab | 10.94 ± 0.99a | 10.73 ± 0.96a | |
| Palmitoleic ac. (C16 : 1) | 0.75 ± 0.07a | 0.70 ± 0.05a | 0.68 ± 0.05a | 0.72 ± 0.06a | 0.65 ± 0.05a | 0.62 ± 0.05a | |
| Fatty acids (%) | Stearic ac. (C18 : 0) | 2.01 ± 0.12a | 1.96 ± 0.11a | 1.77 ± 0.11a | 2.66 ± 0.12a | 2.02 ± 0.12a | 1.80 ± 0.11a |
| Oleic ac. (C18 : 1) | 78.5 ± 1.5a | 79.1 ± 1.6a | 79.6 ± 1.7a | 76.67 ± 0.43a | 78.6 ± 1.6a | 78.8 ± 1.7a | |
| Linoleic ac. (C18 : 2) | 6.05 ± 0.35a | 6.36 ± 0.38a | 6.68 ± 0.41a | 6.38 ± 0.39a | 6.60 ± 0.39a | 6.97 ± 0.42a | |
|
| 0.92 ± 0.11a | 0.81 ± 0.09a | 0.72 ± 0.09a | 0.94 ± 0.09a | 0.84 ± 0.09a | 0.75 ± 0.09a | |
|
| |||||||
| Total phenols (mg kg−1 in caffeic acid) | 450 ± 63a | 315 ± 35b | 157 ± 22c | 510 ± 72a | 327 ± 42b | 182 ± 33c | |