Johnni Hansen1, Christina F Lassen. 1. Institute of Cancer Epidemiology, Danish Cancer Society, Strandboulevarden 49, Copenhagen DK2100, Denmark. johnni@cancer.dk
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Growing but limited evidence suggests that night shift work is associated with breast cancer. The authors conducted a nationwide case-control study nested within a cohort of 18,551 female military employees born in 1929-1968 to investigate the risk for breast cancer after night shift work and to explore the role of leisure time sun exposure and diurnal preference. METHODS: The authors documented 218 cases of breast cancer (1990-2003) and selected 899 age-matched controls from the cohort by incidence density sampling. Information on shift work, sun exposure habits, diurnal preference and other potential confounders was obtained from a structured questionnaire. ORs were estimated by multivariate conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: Overall, the authors observed an adjusted OR of 1.4 (95% CI 0.9 to 2.1) among women with ever compared with never night shifts. The RR for breast cancer tended to increase with increasing number of years of night shift work (p=0.03) and with cumulative number of shifts (p=0.02),with a neutral risk for fewer than three night shifts per week. The OR for the group with the highest tertile of cumulative exposure was 2.3 (95% CI 1.2 to 4.6). The most pronounced effect of night shift work on breast cancer risk was observed in women with morning chronotype preference and intense night shifts (OR=3.9, 95% CI 1.6 to 9.5). Night shift workers tended to sunbathe more frequently than day workers. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that frequent night shift work increases the risk for breast cancer and suggest a higher risk with longer duration of intense night shifts. Women with morning preference who worked on night shifts tended to have a higher risk than those with evening preference.
OBJECTIVES: Growing but limited evidence suggests that night shift work is associated with breast cancer. The authors conducted a nationwide case-control study nested within a cohort of 18,551 female military employees born in 1929-1968 to investigate the risk for breast cancer after night shift work and to explore the role of leisure time sun exposure and diurnal preference. METHODS: The authors documented 218 cases of breast cancer (1990-2003) and selected 899 age-matched controls from the cohort by incidence density sampling. Information on shift work, sun exposure habits, diurnal preference and other potential confounders was obtained from a structured questionnaire. ORs were estimated by multivariate conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: Overall, the authors observed an adjusted OR of 1.4 (95% CI 0.9 to 2.1) among women with ever compared with never night shifts. The RR for breast cancer tended to increase with increasing number of years of night shift work (p=0.03) and with cumulative number of shifts (p=0.02),with a neutral risk for fewer than three night shifts per week. The OR for the group with the highest tertile of cumulative exposure was 2.3 (95% CI 1.2 to 4.6). The most pronounced effect of night shift work on breast cancer risk was observed in women with morning chronotype preference and intense night shifts (OR=3.9, 95% CI 1.6 to 9.5). Night shift workers tended to sunbathe more frequently than day workers. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that frequent night shift work increases the risk for breast cancer and suggest a higher risk with longer duration of intense night shifts. Women with morning preference who worked on night shifts tended to have a higher risk than those with evening preference.
Authors: Irina G Popovich; Mark A Zabezhinski; Andrei V Panchenko; Tatiana S Piskunova; Anna V Semenchenko; Maragriata L Tyndyk; Maria N Yurova; Vladimir N Anisimov Journal: Cell Cycle Date: 2013-05-06 Impact factor: 4.534
Authors: Cody Ramin; Elizabeth E Devore; Weike Wang; Jeffrey Pierre-Paul; Lani R Wegrzyn; Eva S Schernhammer Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2014-09-26 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Barbra A Dickerman; Sarah C Markt; Markku Koskenvuo; Christer Hublin; Eero Pukkala; Lorelei A Mucci; Jaakko Kaprio Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2016-10-12 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Anne Grundy; Michelle Cotterchio; Victoria A Kirsh; Victoria Nadalin; Nancy Lightfoot; Nancy Kreiger Journal: Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Chunla He; Sonia Taj Anand; Mark H Ebell; John E Vena; Sara Wagner Robb Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2014-09-27 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Richard G Stevens; George C Brainard; David E Blask; Steven W Lockley; Mario E Motta Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2013-12-24 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Ruth M Lunn; David E Blask; Andrew N Coogan; Mariana G Figueiro; Michael R Gorman; Janet E Hall; Johnni Hansen; Randy J Nelson; Satchidananda Panda; Michael H Smolensky; Richard G Stevens; Fred W Turek; Roel Vermeulen; Tania Carreón; Claire C Caruso; Christina C Lawson; Kristina A Thayer; Michael J Twery; Andrew D Ewens; Sanford C Garner; Pamela J Schwingl; Windy A Boyd Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2017-07-27 Impact factor: 7.963