Literature DB >> 22644560

The utility of FDG-PET/CT as an effective tool for detecting recurrent colorectal cancer regardless of serum CEA levels.

Yasemin Sanli1, Serkan Kuyumcu, Zeynep Gozde Ozkan, Leyla Kilic, Emre Balik, Cuneyt Turkmen, Duygu Has, Goknur Isik, Oktar Asoglu, Yersu Kapran, Isik Adalet.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Tumor recurrence of colorectal cancers (CRC) is generally followed up by analyses of the serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels. However, recent evidence suggests that tumor recurrence can also be visualized by 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) in patients with normal CEA levels. We retrospectively evaluated the diagnostic performance of FDG-PET/CT in patients with suspected recurrence of CRC by comparing PET/CT performance in patients with normal CEA levels with PET/CT performance in patients with elevated CEA levels.
METHODS: A total of 235 patients with CRC who had been treated with surgery and/or chemotherapy/radiotherapy underwent PET/CT for the detection of tumor recurrence. The patients [96 females and 139 males; age (mean ± SD) 59.9 ± 12.6 years; range 18-85] were divided into 2 groups based on whether their CEA levels were normal (<5 ng/ml) (Group 1, n = 118) or elevated (>5 ng/ml) (Group 2, n = 117). All of the patients had suspected recurrence based on raised CEA levels, clinical symptoms, and/or tumor detection using other imaging modalities.
RESULTS: Of the 235 patients, 172 (73.1 %) had disease recurrence confirmed by a pathological examination (either biopsy or surgical exploration) or clinical follow-up studies. The FDG-PET/CT study yielded a true positive in detecting recurrence in 169 (71.9 %) patients, a true negative in 53 (22.5 %) patients, a false negative in 3 (1.2 %) patients and a false positive in 10 (4.2 %) patients. CRC recurrence was detected in 64.4 % (76/118) and 88 % (103/117) patients in Group 1 and Group 2 with FDG-PET/CT, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of the FDG-PET/CT study for establishing recurrence were 100, 84, 89.4, 100 and 93.2 %, respectively, for Group 1; by contrast, these parameters were 97.1, 84.6, 98, 78.5 and 95.7 %, respectively, for Group 2. The number of patients with hepatic and extra-hepatic metastases, such as lung and abdominal lymph node metastasis, detected with FDG-PET/CT was significantly different in Group 1 than in Group 2; however, the number of patients with local recurrence and peritoneal implants detected with FDG-PET/CT was not different between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: FDG-PET/CT can accurately detect tumor recurrence in patients with suspected recurrent CRC, even for patients with normal CEA levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22644560     DOI: 10.1007/s12149-012-0609-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Nucl Med        ISSN: 0914-7187            Impact factor:   2.668


  16 in total

Review 1.  Use of FDG-PET or PET/CT to detect recurrent colorectal cancer in patients with elevated CEA: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu-Yu Lu; Jin-Hua Chen; Chun-Ru Chien; William Tzu-Liang Chen; Shih-Chuan Tsai; Wan-Yu Lin; Chia-Hung Kao
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Indeterminate pulmonary nodules in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Eun-Joo Jung; Su-Ran Kim; Chun-Geun Ryu; Jin Hee Paik; Jeong Geun Yi; Dae-Yong Hwang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Evaluation of recurrent disease in the re-staging of colorectal cancer by 18F-FDG PET/CT: Use of CEA and CA 19-9 in patient selection.

Authors:  Agostino Chiaravalloti; Alessandro Fiorentini; Erika Palombo; Davide Rinino; Annamaria Lacanfora; Roberta Danieli; Carmen Di Russo; Daniele Di Biagio; Ettore Squillaci; Orazio Schillaci
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Clinical Usefulness of Serum CYFRA 21-1 in Patients with Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Jai Hyuen Lee
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-08-06

Review 5.  Circulating Tumor DNA, Imaging, and Carcinoembryonic Antigen: Comparison of Surveillance Strategies Among Patients Who Underwent Resection of Colorectal Cancer-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zaiba Shafik Dawood; Laura Alaimo; Henrique A Lima; Zorays Moazzam; Chanza Shaikh; Ahmed Sayed Ahmed; Muhammad Musaab Munir; Yutaka Endo; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-10-11       Impact factor: 4.339

6.  The potential role of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the further investigation of colorectal cancer patients with nonspecific findings on standard investigations.

Authors:  Rachel Wong; Jeanne Tie; Margaret Lee; Joshua Cohen; Yuxuan Wang; Lu Li; Stephen Ma; Michael Christie; Suzanne Kosmider; Cristian Tomasetti; Nickolas Papadopoulos; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Peter Gibbs
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 7.  Variants and Pitfalls in PET/CT Imaging of Gastrointestinal Cancers.

Authors:  Vetri Sudar Jayaprakasam; Viktoriya Paroder; Heiko Schöder
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 4.802

8.  The preoperative SUVmax for (18)F-FDG uptake predicts survival in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Debing Shi; Guoxiang Cai; Junjie Peng; Dawei Li; Xinxiang Li; Ye Xu; Sanjun Cai
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 9.  Blood CEA levels for detecting recurrent colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Brian D Nicholson; Bethany Shinkins; Indika Pathiraja; Nia W Roberts; Tim J James; Susan Mallett; Rafael Perera; John N Primrose; David Mant
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-12-10

10.  Diagnostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT as first choice in the detection of recurrent colorectal cancer due to rising CEA.

Authors:  Michael Gade; Magdalena Kubik; Rune V Fisker; Ole Thorlacius-Ussing; Lars J Petersen
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.