PURPOSE: The main purpose of this study was to investigate whether judo could be practised after joint replacement. METHODS: Two hundred and twelve questionnaires were sent to Judokas licensed at the French Judo Federation, over the age of 60, with at least a black belt 6th Dan. Out of 83 responses, 38 individuals, mean age 72.8 ± 7.9 years old, had at least one implant. The survey identified 36 total hip arthroplasties (THA) in 27 patients, 10 total knee arthroplasties (TKA) in 8 patients and 3 total shoulder arthroplasties (TSA) in 3 patients. The main evaluation criterion was the return to judo after joint replacement. Secondary criteria were the level of judo after surgery, rate of surgical revision at the final follow-up and the level of patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Twenty-nine out of 38 patients who underwent joint replacement returned to judo practice (76.3 %) a mean 4.1 ± 2.9 months after surgery. On the other hand, all patients stopped competitive judo. The surgeon recommended 65.8 % of these patients to stop practising judo. There were 2 surgical revisions in the THA group (5.5 %) for loosening at 6 and 9 years of follow-up. No dislocations or fractures were reported at the final follow-up. Thirty-two patients (84.2 %) were satisfied with their implant. CONCLUSION: The practice of judo does not seem to be limited by joint replacement. A clinical and radiological study should be performed to confirm these results.
PURPOSE: The main purpose of this study was to investigate whether judo could be practised after joint replacement. METHODS: Two hundred and twelve questionnaires were sent to Judokas licensed at the French Judo Federation, over the age of 60, with at least a black belt 6th Dan. Out of 83 responses, 38 individuals, mean age 72.8 ± 7.9 years old, had at least one implant. The survey identified 36 total hip arthroplasties (THA) in 27 patients, 10 total knee arthroplasties (TKA) in 8 patients and 3 total shoulder arthroplasties (TSA) in 3 patients. The main evaluation criterion was the return to judo after joint replacement. Secondary criteria were the level of judo after surgery, rate of surgical revision at the final follow-up and the level of patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Twenty-nine out of 38 patients who underwent joint replacement returned to judo practice (76.3 %) a mean 4.1 ± 2.9 months after surgery. On the other hand, all patients stopped competitive judo. The surgeon recommended 65.8 % of these patients to stop practising judo. There were 2 surgical revisions in the THA group (5.5 %) for loosening at 6 and 9 years of follow-up. No dislocations or fractures were reported at the final follow-up. Thirty-two patients (84.2 %) were satisfied with their implant. CONCLUSION: The practice of judo does not seem to be limited by joint replacement. A clinical and radiological study should be performed to confirm these results.
Authors: Jennifer M Weiss; Philip C Noble; Michael A Conditt; Harold W Kohl; Seth Roberts; Karon F Cook; Michael J Gordon; Kenneth B Mathis Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Carol Ewing Garber; Bryan Blissmer; Michael R Deschenes; Barry A Franklin; Michael J Lamonte; I-Min Lee; David C Nieman; David P Swain Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Joseph N Liu; Michael E Steinhaus; Grant H Garcia; Brenda Chang; Kara Fields; David M Dines; Russell F Warren; Lawrence V Gulotta Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2017-04-13 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: David Lester; Colby Barber; Christopher B Sowers; John W Cyrus; Alexander R Vap; Gregory J Golladay; Nirav K Patel Journal: Bone Jt Open Date: 2022-03
Authors: Suzanne Witjes; Vincent Gouttebarge; P Paul F M Kuijer; Rutger C I van Geenen; Rudolf W Poolman; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs Journal: Sports Med Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Alexander Hoorntje; Kim Y Janssen; Stefan B T Bolder; Koen L M Koenraadt; Joost G Daams; Leendert Blankevoort; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs; P Paul F M Kuijer Journal: Sports Med Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 11.136