Anna S Lok1, Huy Trinh2, Giampiero Carosi3, Ulus S Akarca4, Adrian Gadano5, François Habersetzer6, William Sievert7, David Wong8, Meghan Lovegren9, David Cohen9, Cyril Llamoso9. 1. Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Electronic address: aslok@umich.edu. 2. Pacific Health Foundation, San Jose, California. 3. Institute of Infectious and Tropical Disease, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy. 4. Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey. 5. Sección Hepatología, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires-Argentina, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina. 6. Service d'Hépato-gastroentérologie, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, INSERM Unité 748, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France. 7. Department of Medicine, Monash University, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Australia. 8. Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 9. Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Wallingford, Connecticut.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS:Entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) are potent antiviral agents that might have additive or synergistic antiviral activity in treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). We compared the efficacy and safety of ETV monotherapy with those of a combination of ETV and TDF. METHODS: We performed a randomized, open-label, multicenter, superiority study of 379 nucleos(t)ide-naïve patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive (n = 264) or HBeAg-negative (n = 115) CHB. Subjects were given ETV 0.5 mg (n = 182) or a combination of ETV 0.5 mg and TDF 300 mg (n = 197) for 100 weeks. RESULTS: At week 96, comparable proportions of patients in each study arm achieved the primary end point of a level of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA <50 IU/mL (83.2% vs 76.4%; P = .088). Among HBeAg-positive patients, a greater proportion given combination therapy achieved levels of HBV DNA <50 IU/mL than those given ETV alone (80.4% vs 69.8%; P = .046). However, this difference was observed only in patients with baseline levels of HBV DNA ≥ 10(8) IU/mL (79% vs 62%) and not in those with baseline levels of HBV DNA <10(8) IU/mL (83% in both arms). Rates of HBeAg loss and HBeAg seroconversion were comparable between groups, whereas the rate of alanine aminotransferase normalization was greater in the ETV monotherapy group. No HBV variants associated with ETV or TDF resistance were detected. Safety profiles were consistent with previous reports of ETV or TDF monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The antiviral efficacy of ETV monotherapy is comparable to that of ETV plus TDF in a mixed population of nucleos(t)ide-naïve patients with CHB (70% HBeAg positive). The combination therapy could provide an incremental benefit to HBeAg-positive patients with baseline levels of HBV DNA ≥ 10(8) IU/mL.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND & AIMS:Entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) are potent antiviral agents that might have additive or synergistic antiviral activity in treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). We compared the efficacy and safety of ETV monotherapy with those of a combination of ETV and TDF. METHODS: We performed a randomized, open-label, multicenter, superiority study of 379 nucleos(t)ide-naïve patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive (n = 264) or HBeAg-negative (n = 115) CHB. Subjects were given ETV 0.5 mg (n = 182) or a combination of ETV 0.5 mg and TDF 300 mg (n = 197) for 100 weeks. RESULTS: At week 96, comparable proportions of patients in each study arm achieved the primary end point of a level of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA <50 IU/mL (83.2% vs 76.4%; P = .088). Among HBeAg-positive patients, a greater proportion given combination therapy achieved levels of HBV DNA <50 IU/mL than those given ETV alone (80.4% vs 69.8%; P = .046). However, this difference was observed only in patients with baseline levels of HBV DNA ≥ 10(8) IU/mL (79% vs 62%) and not in those with baseline levels of HBV DNA <10(8) IU/mL (83% in both arms). Rates of HBeAg loss and HBeAg seroconversion were comparable between groups, whereas the rate of alanine aminotransferase normalization was greater in the ETV monotherapy group. No HBV variants associated with ETV or TDF resistance were detected. Safety profiles were consistent with previous reports of ETV or TDF monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The antiviral efficacy of ETV monotherapy is comparable to that of ETV plus TDF in a mixed population of nucleos(t)ide-naïve patients with CHB (70% HBeAg positive). The combination therapy could provide an incremental benefit to HBeAg-positive patients with baseline levels of HBV DNA ≥ 10(8) IU/mL.
Authors: T Jake Liang; Timothy M Block; Brian J McMahon; Marc G Ghany; Stephan Urban; Ju-Tao Guo; Stephen Locarnini; Fabien Zoulim; Kyong-Mi Chang; Anna S Lok Journal: Hepatology Date: 2015-10-27 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Norah A Terrault; Anna S F Lok; Brian J McMahon; Kyong-Mi Chang; Jessica P Hwang; Maureen M Jonas; Robert S Brown; Natalie H Bzowej; John B Wong Journal: Hepatology Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Benjamin Yip; Kevin Chaung; Carrie R Wong; Huy N Trinh; Huy A Nguyen; Aijaz Ahmed; Ramsey Cheung; Mindie H Nguyen Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2012-09-26 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Fabien Zoulim; Jolanta Białkowska-Warzecha; Mircea Mihai Diculescu; Adrian Eugen Goldis; Renate Heyne; Tomasz Mach; Patrick Marcellin; Jörg Petersen; Krzysztof Simon; Soumaya Bendahmane; Isabelle Klauck; Wojciech Wasiak; Harry L A Janssen Journal: Hepatol Int Date: 2016-05-20 Impact factor: 6.047