Literature DB >> 22643289

Phylogenetic analysis of Primula section Primula reveals rampant non-monophyly among morphologically distinct species.

Alexander N Schmidt-Lebuhn1, Jurriaan M de Vos, Barbara Keller, Elena Conti.   

Abstract

The type section of Primula (Primulaceae), here considered to include seven species, is phylogenetically quite isolated in its genus. Although its species are popular ornamentals, traditional medicinal plants and model organisms for the study of heterostyly, the section has not yet been studied from a phylogenetic or evolutionary perspective. Using phylogenetic analysis of nuclear ITS and plastid data from all species and subspecies, we find that widespread Primula elatior is genetically heterogeneous and non-monophyletic to most if not all of the other ingroup taxa. The Genealogical Sorting Index (GSI) indicates that the assumption of all currently accepted species being independent lineages is consistent with the data. It is possible that P. elatior in its current circumscription may represents the disjointed remnant of an ancestral species from which the other recognized species diverged. However, based on available data, the alternative possibility of introgression explaining the non-monophyly of this species cannot be excluded. Species trees show P. elatior and P. veris as sister species. Primula vulgaris and P. juliae are closely related, while, in contrast to previous assumptions, P. renifolia does not appear to be a close relative of P. megaseifolia. With the section's isolation from the rest of the genus and very short internal branches, our dataset also presents a case study of the confounding effects of different branch length priors on the Bayesian estimation of resulting branch length estimates. Experimental runs using different priors confirm the problem of resulting estimates varying by orders of magnitude, while topology and relative branch lengths seem unaffected.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22643289     DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.05.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol        ISSN: 1055-7903            Impact factor:   4.286


  7 in total

1.  The Complete Chloroplast Genomes of Primula obconica Provide Insight That Neither Species nor Natural Section Represent Monophyletic Taxa in Primula (Primulaceae).

Authors:  Qiang Li
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.141

2.  Decrease of sexual organ reciprocity between heterostylous primrose species, with possible functional and evolutionary implications.

Authors:  Barbara Keller; Jurriaan M de Vos; Elena Conti
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Phylogeny and biogeography of Primula sect. Armerina: implications for plant evolution under climate change and the uplift of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau.

Authors:  Guangpeng Ren; Elena Conti; Nicolas Salamin
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-08-16       Impact factor: 3.260

4.  The draft genome of Primula veris yields insights into the molecular basis of heterostyly.

Authors:  Michael D Nowak; Giancarlo Russo; Ralph Schlapbach; Cuong Nguyen Huu; Michael Lenhard; Elena Conti
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 13.583

5.  Both morph- and species-dependent asymmetries affect reproductive barriers between heterostylous species.

Authors:  Barbara Keller; Jurriaan M de Vos; Alexander N Schmidt-Lebuhn; James D Thomson; Elena Conti
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Incongruence between nuclear and chloroplast DNA phylogenies in pedicularis section Cyathophora (Orobanchaceae).

Authors:  Wen-Bin Yu; Pan-Hui Huang; De-Zhu Li; Hong Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Dealing with discordant genetic signal caused by hybridisation, incomplete lineage sorting and paucity of primary nucleotide homologies: a case study of closely related members of the genus Picris subsection Hieracioides (Compositae).

Authors:  Marek Slovák; Jaromír Kučera; Eliška Záveská; Peter Vd'ačný
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.