| Literature DB >> 22643131 |
Benjaporn Panichareon1, Kazuhiro Nakayama, Sadahiko Iwamoto, Wanpen Thurakitwannakarn, Wasana Sukhumsirichart.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A genome-wide association study (GWAS) combined with brain imaging as a quantitative trait analysis revealed that the SNPs near CTXN3-SLC12A2 region were related to forebrain development and stress response which involved in schizophrenia. In the present study, the SNPs in this region were analyzed for association with schizophrenia in a Thai population.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22643131 PMCID: PMC3433332 DOI: 10.1186/1744-9081-8-27
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Behav Brain Funct ISSN: 1744-9081 Impact factor: 3.759
Results of the association analyses
| rs7711139 | | A/A | A/G | G/G | | a | 0.139 | 1.29(0.96–1.74) | |
| | intronic | Patients | 17 | 45 | 52 | 0.34 | d | 0.528 | 1.23(0.84–1.95) |
| | | Controls | 13 | 74 | 85 | 0.29 | r | 0.047 | |
| rs248707 | | C/C | C/T | T/T | | a | 0.594 | 1.24(0.88–1.74) | |
| | 3′UTR | Patients | 7 | 40 | 67 | 0.24 | d | 0.325 | 1.27(0.80–2.00) |
| | | Controls | 8 | 53 | 111 | 0.20 | r | 0.580 | |
| rs1421746 | Intergenic | | C/C | C/T | T/T | | a | 0.025 | 0.61(0.46–0.81) |
| | | Patients | 37 | 49 | 26 | 0.45 | d | 0.038 | 0.58(0.39–0.86) |
| | | Controls | 38 | 71 | 64 | 0.57 | r | 0.015 | |
| rs698172 | Intergenic | | C/C | C/T | T/T | | a | 0.012 | 0.61(0.46–0.82) |
| | | Patients | 49 | 41 | 21 | 0.38 | d | 0.003* | 0.58(0.38–0.87) |
| | | Controls | 47 | 81 | 45 | 0.49 | r | 0.167 | |
| rs698171 | Intergenic | | G/G | G/T | T/T | | a | 0.028 | 1.56(1.13–2.16) |
| | | Patients | 57 | 44 | 11 | 0.29 | d | 0.10 | 1.58(1.01–2.48) |
| | | Controls | 105 | 63 | 5 | 0.21 | r | 0.01 | |
| rs245201 | Intergenic | | A/A | A/G | G/G | | a | 0.083 | 0.81(0.60–1.08) |
| | | Patients | 51 | 41 | 22 | 0.37 | d | 0.052 | 0.77(0.51–1.15) |
| | | Controls | 56 | 82 | 30 | 0.42 | r | 0.759 | |
| rs245178 | Intergenic | | A/A | A/G | G/G | | a | 0.021 | 0.62(0.46–0.83) |
| | | Patients | 54 | 43 | 15 | 0.33 | d | 0.006* | 0.57(0.38–0.86) |
| Controls | 55 | 83 | 34 | 0.44 | r | 0.165 | |||
1MAF: Minor allele frequency.
2P values for the additive model (a), dominant model (d), and recessive model (r) are shown. Asterisks indicate tests that were significant at 5% level after the Bonferroni correction for multiple SNP testing.
3Allelic OR (upper) indicates odds ratio and 95% confidence interval of minor alleles. Generalized OR (lower) indicates odds ratio and 95% confidence interval of genotypes [14].
Figure 1 Linkage disequilibrium status of the - region in Thai individuals. r values calculated from genotype data of 47 Thai are indicated. The haplotype blocks were defined by using the default setting of the Haploview software.
Figure 2 Pairwise LD status of the 7 SNPs in 115 patients and 173 controls. Upper and lower triangles indicate D’ and r, respectively. LD status of each pair of SNPs is color-coded by its strength (see the explanatory notes in the figure).
Haplotype analysis
| Haplotype1 | T | A | 0.09(0.02) | 0.10(0.02) |
| Haplotype2 | T | G | 0.29(0.03) | 0.39(0.03) |
| Haplotyep3 | C | A | 0.58(0.03) | 0.46(0.03) |
| Haplotype4 | C | G | 0.04(0.01) | 0.04(0.01) |
| | | | ||
| Overall | 0.04 | | | |
| Haplotype 2 versus Haplotype 3 | 0.005 | 0.58(0.43–0.79) |
*P values in χ2 test are shown.
For each haplotype, relative frequencies and the standard deviation (in parentheses) are shown.