Literature DB >> 22642986

Comparing variational Bayes with Markov chain Monte Carlo for Bayesian computation in neuroimaging.

F S Nathoo1, M L Lesperance, A B Lawson, C B Dean.   

Abstract

In this article, we consider methods for Bayesian computation within the context of brain imaging studies. In such studies, the complexity of the resulting data often necessitates the use of sophisticated statistical models; however, the large size of these data can pose significant challenges for model fitting. We focus specifically on the neuroelectromagnetic inverse problem in electroencephalography, which involves estimating the neural activity within the brain from electrode-level data measured across the scalp. The relationship between the observed scalp-level data and the unobserved neural activity can be represented through an underdetermined dynamic linear model, and we discuss Bayesian computation for such models, where parameters represent the unknown neural sources of interest. We review the inverse problem and discuss variational approximations for fitting hierarchical models in this context. While variational methods have been widely adopted for model fitting in neuroimaging, they have received very little attention in the statistical literature, where Markov chain Monte Carlo is often used. We derive variational approximations for fitting two models: a simple distributed source model and a more complex spatiotemporal mixture model. We compare the approximations to Markov chain Monte Carlo using both synthetic data as well as through the analysis of a real electroencephalography dataset examining the evoked response related to face perception. The computational advantages of the variational method are demonstrated and the accuracy associated with the resulting approximations are clarified.

Keywords:  Metropolis–Hastings algorithm; electroencephalography; neuroelectromagnetic inverse problem; variational Bayes

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22642986     DOI: 10.1177/0962280212448973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  3 in total

1.  Bayesian Computation for Log-Gaussian Cox Processes: A Comparative Analysis of Methods.

Authors:  Ming Teng; Farouk S Nathoo; Timothy D Johnson
Journal:  J Stat Comput Simul       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 1.424

Review 2.  Brain investigation and brain conceptualization.

Authors:  Alberto Redolfi; Paolo Bosco; David Manset; Giovanni B Frisoni
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2013 Jul-Sep

3.  Time series analysis of fMRI data: Spatial modelling and Bayesian computation.

Authors:  Ming Teng; Timothy D Johnson; Farouk S Nathoo
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 2.373

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.