Literature DB >> 22642466

Use of multiparametric MR with neurovascular bundle evaluation to optimize the oncological and functional management of patients considered for nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.

Valeria Panebianco1, Stefano Salciccia, Susanna Cattarino, Francesco Minisola, Alessandro Gentilucci, Andrea Alfarone, Gian Piero Ricciuti, Andrea Marcantonio, Danilo Lisi, Vincenzo Gentile, Roberto Passariello, Alessandro Sciarra.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To obtain the best results with radical prostatectomy, either from an oncological or a functional point of view, a correct selection of cases and planning of surgery are crucial. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) promises to make it a successful imaging tool for improving many aspects of prostate cancer management. AIM: The aim of this study is to evaluate whether a modern multiparametric MRI can help either to better select prostate cancer cases for a nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy or to improve the functional evaluation related to neurovascular bundles preservation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The effect of preoperative MRI on neurovascular bundle management was examined for the frequency and the appropriateness of changes of the surgical plane on the basis of MRI indications.
METHODS: In a prospective study, 125 consecutive patients with biopsy proven prostate cancer who were scheduled to undergo bilateral nerve-sparing surgery. All patients included into the study were submitted to a preoperative multiparametric MRI. On the basis of MRI evaluation, patients were divided into two groups. Patients in group A were then submitted to a bilateral nerve-sparing (NS) radical prostatectomy (RP), whereas patients in group B were submitted to unilateral NS or non-NS RP.
RESULTS: In group A, the confirmation from the MRI study to perform a bilateral NS procedure was appropriate in 70 of 73 cases (95.9%), whereas in group B, the surgical plan was appropriate in 28 of 32 cases (87.5%). On the contrary, MRI findings suggested a change in the initial surgical plan (group B) for 32 of 105 cases (30.5%). Of these 32 cases in group B, MRI suggested to perform a unilateral NS procedure in 21 of 32 cases (65.6%) and a non-NS procedure in 11 of 32 cases (34.4%).
CONCLUSIONS: Multiparametric MRI analysis can significantly improve the standard selection and management of prostate carcinoma cases considered for an NS RP.
© 2012 International Society for Sexual Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22642466     DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02794.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Med        ISSN: 1743-6095            Impact factor:   3.802


  8 in total

1.  Quantitative study of prostate cancer using three dimensional fiber tractography.

Authors:  Sandeep Hedgire; Alexey Tonyushkin; Aoife Kilcoyne; Jason A Efstathiou; Peter F Hahn; Mukesh Harisinghani
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-04-28

2.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for pre-treatment local staging of prostate cancer: A Cancer Care Ontario clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Jennifer Salerno; Antonio Finelli; Chris Morash; Scott C Morgan; Nicholas Power; Nichola Schieda; Masoom A Haider
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Role of MRI in planning radical prostatectomy: what is the added value?

Authors:  Jose Marenco; Clement Orczyk; Tom Collins; Caroline Moore; Mark Emberton
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  The role of MRI in prostate cancer: current and future directions.

Authors:  Maria Clara Fernandes; Onur Yildirim; Sungmin Woo; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 2.533

Review 5.  Novel methods for mapping the cavernous nerves during radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Nathaniel M Fried; Arthur L Burnett
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Clinical utility of MRI in the decision-making process before radical prostatectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mieszko Kozikowski; Wojciech Malewski; Wojciech Michalak; Jakub Dobruch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Current Opinion on the Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Staging Prostate Cancer: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Jamie Michael; Kevin Neuzil; Ersan Altun; Marc A Bjurlin
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.989

8.  Effect of androgen deprivation and radiation therapy on MRI fiber tractography in prostate cancer: can we assess treatment response on imaging?

Authors:  Sandeep Hedgire; Aoife Kilcoyne; Alexey Tonyushkin; Yun Mao; Jennifer W Uyeda; Debra A Gervais; Mukesh G Harisinghani
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 3.039

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.