Literature DB >> 22641438

Photoelastic evaluation of the effect of composite formulation on polymerization shrinkage stress.

Karla Mychellyne Costa Oliveira1, Simonides Consani, Luciano Souza Gonçalves, William Cunha Brandt, Renzo Alberto Ccahuana-Vásquez.   

Abstract

We compared polymerization stress in two commercial composites and three experimental composites made using camphorquinone (CQ) and/or phenylpropanedione (PPD) as photoinitiators. The internal surfaces of photoelastic resin discs with cylindrical cavities were roughened and treated with adhesive. Composites were divided into five groups: two commercial composites (Filtek Silorane and Filtek Z250) and three experimental composites with CQ/amine, CQ/PPD/amine, and PPD/amine. Composites were photopolymerized inside cavities, and subjected to photoelastic analysis immediately and at 24 hours and 7 days later using a plane polariscope. Stress created by Silorane (3.08 ± 0.09 MPa) was similar to that of Z250 (3.19 ± 0.13 MPa) immediately after photopolymerization (p > 0.05). After 24 hours and 7 days, Z250 (3.53 ± 0.15 and 3.69 ± 0.10 MPa, respectively) showed higher stress than Silorane (3.19 ± 0.10 and 3.16 ± 0.10 MPa, respectively). Qualitative analysis immediately after photopolymerization showed composite/CQ promoted higher stress than PPD, but stress levels at other evaluated times were statistically similar, varying between 3.45 ± 0.11 MPa and 3.92 ± 0.13 MPa. At 24 hours and 7 days, Silorane created the lowest stress. All photoinitiators created comparable tensions during polymerization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22641438     DOI: 10.1590/s1806-83242012000300004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz Oral Res        ISSN: 1806-8324


  5 in total

Review 1.  Polymerization shrinkage assessment of dental resin composites: a literature review.

Authors:  Dalia Kaisarly; Moataz El Gezawi
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  Evaluation of bond strength of silorane and methacrylate based restorative systems to dentin using different cavity models.

Authors:  Stephano Zerlottini Isaac; Ana Claudia Pietrobom Bergamin; Cecília Pedroso Turssi; Flávia Lucisano Botelho do Amaral; Roberta Tarkany Basting; Fabiana Mantovani Gomes França
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.698

Review 3.  Analytical methods for the measurement of polymerization kinetics and stresses of dental resin-based composites: A review.

Authors:  Mehrsima Ghavami-Lahiji; Tabassom Hooshmand
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug

4.  The Influence of Low-Molecular-Weight Monomers (TEGDMA, HDDMA, HEMA) on the Properties of Selected Matrices and Composites Based on Bis-GMA and UDMA.

Authors:  Agata Szczesio-Wlodarczyk; Aleksander Polikowski; Michał Krasowski; Magdalena Fronczek; Jerzy Sokolowski; Kinga Bociong
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 5.  Photoelasticity for Stress Concentration Analysis in Dentistry and Medicine.

Authors:  Miriam Marín-Miranda; Ana María Wintergerst; Yoshamin Abnoba Moreno-Vargas; María Lilia Adriana Juárez-López; Cesar Tavera-Ruiz
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 3.748

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.